The authors present a polytomous item randomized response model to measure socially sensitive consumer behavior. It complements established methods in marketing to correct for social desirability bias a posteriori and traditional randomized response models to prevent social desirability bias a priori. The model allows for individual-level inferences at the construct level while protecting the privacy of respondents at the item level. In addition, it is possible to incorporate covariates in to various parts of the model. The proposed method is especially useful to study social issues in marketing. In the empirical application, the authors use a two-group experimental survey design and find that with the new procedure, participants report their sensitive desires more truthfully, with significant differences between socioeconomic groups. In addition, the method performs better than methods based on social desirability scales. Finally, the authors discuss truthfulness in data collection and confidentiality in data utilization.
AguinisHerman, and HenleChristine A., (2001), “Empirical Assessment of the Ethics of the Bogus Pipeline,”Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 352–75.
2.
AguinisHerman, PierceCharles A., and QuigleyBrian M., (1993), “Conditions Under Which a Bogus Pipeline Procedure Enhances the Validity of Self-Reported Cigarette Smoking: A Meta-Analytic Review,”Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(5), 352–73.
3.
AndersonJames C., and GerbingDavid W., (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,”Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–23.
4.
BaumeisterRoy F., CataneseKathleen R., and VohsKathleen D., (2001), “Is There a Gender Difference in Strength of Sex Drive? Theoretical Views, Conceptual Distinctions, and a Review of Relevant Evidence,”Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242–73.
5.
BaumeisterRoy F., and VohsKathleen D., (2004), “Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Social Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions,”Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 339–63.
6.
BeardenWilliam O., and NetemeyerRichard G., (1999), Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-Item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research, 2d ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
7.
BöckenholtUlf, and Van der HeijdenPeter G.M., (2007), “Item Randomized–Response Models for Measuring Noncompliance: Risk–Return Perceptions, Social Influences, and Self-Protective Responses,”Psychometrika, 72(June), 245–62.
8.
BrunerGordon C., and HenselPaul J., (1992), Marketing Scales Handbook: A Compilation of Multi-Item Measures.Chicago: American Marketing Association.
9.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., (1979), “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16(February), 64–73.
10.
ClarkStephen J., and DesharnaisRobert A., (1998), “Honest Answers to Embarrassing Questions: Detecting Cheating in the Randomized Response Model,”Psychological Methods, 3(June), 160–68.
11.
CroninBlaise, and DavenportElisabeth, (2001), “E-Rogenous Zones: Positioning Pornography in the Digital Economy,”The Information Society, 17(1), 33–46.
12.
De BoeckPaul, and WilsonMark, (2004), Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach.New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
De JongMartijn G., SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and FoxJeanPaul, (2007), “Relaxing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research Using a Hierarchical IRT Model,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34(August), 260–79.
14.
De JongMartijn G., SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., FoxJeanPaul, and BaumgartnerHans, (2008), “Using Item Response Theory to Measure Extreme Response Style in Marketing Research: A Global Investigation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45(February), 104–115.
15.
DerakshanNazanin, and EysenckMichael W., (2005), “When the Bogus-Pipeline Interferes with Self-Deceptive Strategies: Effects on State Anxiety in Repressors,”Cognition and Emotion, 19(1), 83–100.
16.
Evans-DeCiccoJennee A., and CowanGloria, (2001), “Attitudes Toward Pornography and the Characteristics Attributed to Pornography Actors,”Sex Roles, 44(5–6), 351–61.
17.
FischerRobert, J., (1993), “Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20(September), 303–315.
18.
FoxJames A., and TracyPaul E., (1986), Randomized Response: A Method for Sensitive Surveys.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
19.
FoxJean-Paul, (2005), “Randomized Item Response Theory Models,”Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(2), 189–212.
20.
FrankelLester, R., (1976), “Statistics and People: Statisticians Responsibility,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(353), 9–16.
21.
GoodsonPatricia, McCormickDeborah, and EvansAlexandra, (2001), “Searching for Sexually Explicit Materials on the Internet: An Exploratory Study of College Students’ Behavior and Attitudes,”Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30(2), 101–118.
22.
GreenbergBernard G., Abul-ElaAbdel-Latif A., SimmonsWalt R., and HorvitzDaniel G., (1969), “Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model: Theoretical Framework,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(326), 520–39.
23.
GrelloCatherine M., WelshDeborah P., and HarperMelinda S., (2006), “No Strings Attached: The Nature of Casual Sex in College Students,”Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 255–67.
24.
HennessyMichael, BleakleyAmy, FishbeinMartin, and JordanAmy, (2008), “Validating an Index of Adolescent Sexual Behavior Using Psychosocial Theory and Social Trait Correlates,”AIDS and Behavior, 12(2), 321–31.
25.
HillPeter C., DillCharles A., and DavenportErnest C., (1988), “A Reexamination of the Bogus Pipeline,”Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(3), 587–601.
26.
JonesEdward E., and SigallHarold, (1971), “The Bogus Pipeline: A New Paradigm for Measuring Affect and Attitude,”Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 349–64.
27.
KimmelAllan J., and Craig SmithN., (2001), “Deception in Marketing Research: Ethical, Methodological, and Disciplinary Implications,”Psychology & Marketing, 18(7), 663–89.
28.
LambCharles W., and StemDonald E., (1978), “An Empirical Validation of the Randomized Response Technique,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15(November), 616–21.
29.
Lensvelt-MuldersGerty J.L.M., HoxJoop J., Van der HeijdenPeter G.M., and MaasCora J.M., (2005), “Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research: 35 Years of Validation,”Sociological Methods and Research, 33(3), 319–48.
30.
LocanderWilliam, SudmanSeymour, and BradburnNorman, (1976), “An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat, and Response Distortion,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(June), 269–75.
31.
LordFrederic M., and NovickMelvin R., (1968), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32.
MestonCindy M., HeimanJulia R., TrapnellPaul D., and PaulhusDelroy L., (1998), “Socially Desirable Responding and Sexuality Self-Reports,”Journal of Sex Research, 35(2), 148–57.
33.
MickDavid, G., (1996), “Are Studies of Dark Side Variables Confounded by Socially Desirable Responding? The Case of Materialism,”Journal of Consumer Research, 23(September), 106–119.
34.
MickDavid, G., (2005), “Meaning and Mattering Through Transformative Consumer Research,” presidential address at the Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, San Antonio, TX, (September 28–30).
35.
PaulhusDelroy, L., (2002), “Socially Desirable Responding: The Evolution of a Construct,” in The Role of Constructs in Psychological and Educational Measurement, BraunH.I., JacksonD.N., and WileyD.E., eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 49–69.
36.
PeruginiMarco, and BagozziRichard, (2001), “The Role of Desires and Anticipated Emotions in Goal-Directed Behaviours: Broadening and Deepening the Theory of Planned Behaviour,”British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79–98.
37.
PeruginiMarco, and BagozziRichard, (2004), “The Distinction Between Desires and Intentions,”European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(1), 69–84.
38.
PodsakoffPhilip M., MacKenzieScott B., LeeJeong-Yeon, and PodsakoffNathan P., (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(October), 879–903.
39.
ReinmuthJames E., and GeurtsMichael D., (1975), “The Collection of Sensitive Information Using a Two-Stage, Randomized Response Model,”Journal of Marketing Research, 12(November), 402–407.
40.
RoeseNeal J., and JamiesonDavid W., (1993), “Twenty Years of Bogus Pipeline Research: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis,”Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 363–75.
41.
SamejimaFumiko, (1969), “Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores,”Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 17, 1–100.
42.
SchmittDavid, P., (2003), “Universal Sex Differences in the Desire for Sexual Variety: Tests from 52 Nations, 6 Continents, and 13 Islands,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 83–104.
43.
SmithD. Brent, and EllingsonJill E., (2002), “Substance Versus Style: A New Lookat Social Desirability in Motivating Contexts,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 211–19.
44.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., de JongMartijn G., and BaumgartnerHans, (2010), “Socially Desirable Response Tendencies in Survey Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(April), forthcoming.
45.
TourangeauRoger, RipsLance J., and RasinskiKenneth, (2000), The Psychology of Survey Response.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
TourangeauRoger, and SmithTom W., (1996), “Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2), 275–304.
47.
TracyPaul E., and FoxJames E., (1981), “The Validity of Randomized Response for Sensitive Measurements,”American Sociological Review, 46(April), 187–200.
48.
TraenBente, Eek-JensenLine M., and StigumHein, (2005), “Sex Customers in Norway 2002,”Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 8(September 26), 1–18.
49.
TreasJudith, and GiesenDeirdre, (2000), “Sexual Infidelity Among Married and Cohabiting Americans,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(1), 48–60.
50.
WarnerStanley, L., (1965), “Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(309), 63–69.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
