Restricted accessOtherFirst published online 2009-2
Commentaries and Rejoinder to “Trade-Off Aversion as an Explanation for the Attraction Effect: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study”: Integrating Neural and Decision Sciences: Convergence and Constraints
ChiuP.H., LohrenzT.M., and MontagueP.R. (2008), “Smokers’ Brains Compute, but Ignore, a Fictive Error Signal in a Sequential Investment Task,”Nature Neuroscience, 11(4), 514–20.
3.
ClitheroJ.A., TankersleyD., and HuettelS.A. (2008), “Foundation of Neuroeconomics: From Philosophy to Practice,”Public Library of Science: Biology, 6, forthcoming.
4.
DelgadoM.R., NystromL.E., FissellC., NollD.C., and FiezJ.A. (2000), “Tracking the Hemodynamic Responses to Reward and Punishment in the Striatum,”Journal of Neurophysiology, 84(6), 3072–3077.
5.
HarbaughW.T., MayrU., and BurghartD.R. (2007), “Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations,”Science, 316(5831), 1622–25.
6.
HedgcockWilliam, and RaoAkshay R. (2009), “Trade-Off Aversion as an Explanation for the Attraction Effect: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46(February), 1–13.
7.
HsuM., BhattM., AdolphsR., TranelD., and CamererC.F. (2005), “Neural Systems Responding to Degrees of Uncertainty in Human Decision-Making,”Science, 310(5754), 1680–83.
8.
HuberJoel, PayneJ.W., and PutoC. (1982), “Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 90–98.
9.
HuettelS.A., SongA.W., and McCarthyG. (2005), “Decisions Under Uncertainty: Probabilistic Context Influences Activity of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices,”Journal of Neuroscience, 25(13), 3304–3311.
10.
King-CasasB., TomlinD., AnenC., CamererC.F., QuartzS.R., and MontagueP.R. (2005), “Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange,”Science, 308(5718), 78–83.
11.
KnutsonB., TaylorJ., KaufmanM., PetersonR., and GloverG. (2005), “Distributed Neural Representation of Expected Value,”Journal of Neuroscience, 25(19), 4806–4812.
12.
KuhnenC.M., and KnutsonB. (2005), “The Neural Basis of Financial Risk Taking,”Neuron, 47(5), 763–70.
13.
LuceM.F. (1998), “Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 409–433.
14.
LuceM.F., BettmanJames R., and PayneJohn W. (2001), “Emotional Decisions: Tradeoff Difficulty and Coping in Consumer Choice,”Monographs of the Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–209.
15.
LuceR.D. (1977), “The Choice Axiom After Twenty Years,”Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 215–33.
16.
MasonM.F., NortonM.I., Van HornJ.D., WegnerD.M., GraftonS.T., and MacraeC.N. (2007), “Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought,”Science, 315(5810), 393–95.
17.
PoldrackR.A. (2006), “Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred from Neuroimaging Data?”Trends in Cognitive Science, 10(2), 59–63.
18.
RacineE., Bar-IlanO., and IllesJ. (2005), “fMRI in the Public Eye,”Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(2), 159–64.
19.
SchultzW., DayanP., and MontagueP.R. (1997), “A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward,”Science, 275(5306), 1593–99.
SimonsonI. (1989), “Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 158–74.
22.
TankersleyD., StoweC.J., and HuettelS.A. (2007), “Altruism Is Associated with an Increased Neural Response to Agency,”Nature Neuroscience, 10(2), 150–51.