Six studies demonstrate that interrupting a consumption experience can make pleasant experiences more enjoyable and unpleasant experiences more irritating, even though consumers avoid breaks in pleasant experiences and choose breaks in unpleasant experiences. Across a variety of hedonic experiences (e.g., listening to noises or songs, sitting in a massage chair), the authors observe that breaks disrupt hedonic adaptation and, as a result, intensify the subsequent experience.
ArielyDan, and ZaubermanGal (2000), “On the Making of an Experience: The Effects of Breaking and Combining Experiences on Their Overall Evaluation,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(April), 219–32.
2.
ArielyDan, and ZaubermanGal (2003), “Differential Partitioning of Extended Experiences,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(July), 128–39.
3.
BrickmanPhilip, CoatesDan, and Janoff-BulmanRonnie (1978), “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(August), 917–27.
4.
CarrDeborah, HouseJames S., WortmanCamille, NeeseRandolph, and KesslerRonald C. (2001), “Psychological Adjustment to Sudden and Anticipated Spousal Loss Among Older Widowed Persons,”Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56(July), S237–48.
5.
EasterlinRichard A. (1995), “Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27(June), 35–47.
6.
FrederickShane, and LoewensteinGeorge (1999), “Hedonic Adaptation,” in Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, KahnemanDaniel, DienerEd, and SchwarzNorbert, eds. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 302–329.
7.
GilbertDaniel T., PinelElizabeth C., WilsonTimothy D., BlumbergStephen J., and WheatleyThalia P. (1998), “Immune Neglect: A Source of Durability Bias in Affective Forecasting,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(September), 617–38.
8.
KahnemanDaniel, FredricksonBarbara L., SchreiberCharles A., and RedelmeierDonald A. (1993), “When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End,”Psychological Science, 4(November), 401–405.
9.
KahnemanDaniel, and SnellJackie (1990), “Predicting Utility,” in Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn, RobinM. Hogarth, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 295–310.
10.
KennyDavid A., KashyDeborah A., and BolgerNiall (1998), “Data Analysis in Social Psychology,” in Handbook of Social Psychology, DanielT. Gilbert, FiskeSusan T., and LindzeyGardner, eds. New York: McGraw-Hill, 233–65.
11.
LinvillePatricia W., and FischerGregory W. (1991), “Preferences for Separating or Combining Events,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(January), 5–23.
12.
LoewensteinGeorge (1987), “Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption,”The Economic Journal, 97(September), 666–84.
13.
LoewensteinGeorge, and FrederickShane (1997), “Predicting Reactions to Environmental Change,” in Environment, Ethics, and Behavior: The Psychology of Environmental Valuation and Degradation, Max BazermanDavid, MessickM., TenbrunselAnn E., and Wade-BenzoniKimberly A., eds. San Francisco: The New Lexington Press/Jossey-Bass, 52–72.
14.
LoewensteinGeorge, and SchkadeDavid (1999), “Wouldn't It Be Nice? Predicting Future Feelings,” in Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, KahnemanDaniel, DienerEd, and SchwarzNorbert, eds. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 85–105.
15.
LyubomirskyS., SheldonK.M., and SchkadeD. (2005), “Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change,”Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–31.
16.
NovemskyNathan, and RatnerRebecca K. (2003), “The Time Course and Impact of Consumers’ Erroneous Beliefs About Hedonic Contrast Effects,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29(March), 507–516.
17.
OppenheimerDaniel M., MeyvisTom, and DavidenkoNicolas (2006), “Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power in Survey Studies and Experiments,” working paper, Department of Psychology, Princeton University.
18.
PhamMichel Tuan, CohenJoel B., PracejusJohn W., and HughesDavid G. (2001), “Affect Monitoring and the Primacy of Feelings in Judgment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28(September), 167–88.
19.
RiisJason, LoewensteinGeorge, BaronJonathan, JepsonChristopher, FagerlinAngela, and UbelPeter A. (2005), “Ignorance of Hedonic Adaptation to Hemodialysis: A Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(1), 3–9.
20.
SheldonK.M., and LyubomirskyS. (2006), “Achieving Sustainable Gains in Happiness: Change Your Actions, Not Your Circumstances,”Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(1), 55–86.
21.
SimmonsJoseph P., and NelsonLeif D. (2006), “Intuitive Confidence: Choosing Between Intuitive and Nonintuitive Alternatives,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(August), 409–428.
22.
SnellJackie, GibbsBrian J., and VareyCarol (1995), “Intuitive Hedonics: Consumer Beliefs About the Dynamics of Liking,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(1), 33–60.
23.
SuedfeldPeter, RamirezCarmenza, DeatonJohn, and Baker-BrownGloria (1982), “Reactions and Attributes of Prisoners in Solitary Confinement,”Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9(September), 303–340.
24.
TverskyAmos, and GriffinDale (1991), “Endowment and Contrast in Judgments of Well-Being,” in Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, StrackFritz, ArgyleMichael, and SchwarzNorbert, eds. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 101–118.
25.
WeinsteinNeil D. (1982), “Community Noise Problems: Evidence Against Adaptation,”Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2(2), 87–97.
26.
WilsonTimothy D., and GilbertDaniel T. (2003), “Affective Forecasting,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 35, MarkP. Zanna, ed. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press, 345–411.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
