The authors demonstrate that antismoking advertisements are the most persuasive when the viewers’ regulatory focus, the message's regulatory focus, and the message frame function synergistically. In two experiments, 1000 adolescents saw either antismoking advertising about smoking's social consequences or control advertising in a television show. The authors find that for promotion-focused adolescents, a promotion-focused positively framed antismoking message is the most effective at persuading them not to smoke; for prevention-focused adolescents, a prevention-focused negatively framed antismoking message is the most effective. The enhanced ad effectiveness is mediated by message accessibility and diagnosticity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerJennifer L., and LeeAngela Y. (2001), “‘I’ Seek Pleasures and ‘We’ Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (June), 33–49.
2.
AakerJennifer L. (2006), “Understanding Regulatory Fit,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (February), 15–19.
3.
AhluwaliaRohini, Rao UnnavaH., and BurnkrantRobert E. (2001), “The Moderating Role of Commitment on the Spillover Effect of Marketing Communication,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (November), 458–70.
4.
BaronR.M., and KennyD.A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (8), 1173–82.
5.
BelkRussell W., BahnKenneth D., and MayerRobert N. (1982), “Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (1), 4–17.
ChernevAlexander (2004), “Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (December), 557–65.
8.
EdellJulie A., and BurkeMarian C. (1987), “The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (December), 421–33.
9.
EdwardsC.A., HarrisW.C., CookD.R., BedfordK.F., and ZuoY. (2004), “Out of the Smokescreen: Does an Antismoking Advertisement Affect Young Women's Perception of Smoking in Movies and Their Intention to Smoke?”Tobacco Control, 13 (3), 277–82.
10.
FarrellyM.C., NiederdeppeJ., and YarsevichJ. (2003), “Youth Tobacco Prevention Mass Media Campaigns: Past, Present, and Future Directions,”Tobacco Control, 12 (Supplement 1), 35–47.
11.
FeldmanJack M., and JohnG. LynchJr. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (August), 421–35.
12.
FishbeinMartin, and AjzenIcek (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
FlynnBrian, WordenJ.K., and Secker-WalkerR.H. (1992), “Prevention of Cigarette Smoking Through Mass Media Intervention and School Programs,”American Journal of Public Health, 82 (6), 827–34.
14.
FreitasAntonio L., LibermanNira, and Tory HigginsE. (2002), “Regulatory Fit and Resisting Temptation During Goal Pursuit,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (3), 291–98.
15.
HastingsG., and MacFadyenL. (2002), “The Limitations of Fear Messages,”Tobacco Control, 11 (11), 73–75.
16.
HerrPaul M., KardesFrank R., and KimJohn (1991), “Effects of Word of Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (3), 454–62.
17.
HigginsE. Tory (1987), “Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect,”Psychological Review, 94 (3), 319–40.
HornikRobert (2002), Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20.
IdsonLorraine Chen, LibermanNira, and Tory HigginsE. (2000), “Distinguishing Gains from Nonlosses and Losses from Non-gains: A Regulatory Focus Perspective on Hedonic Intensity,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36 (May), 252–74.
21.
JaniszewskiChris (1993), “Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (December), 376–92.
22.
KempfDeanna S., and SmithRobert E. (1998), “Consumer Processing of Product Trial and the Influence of Prior Advertising: A Structural Modeling Approach,”Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (August), 325–38.
23.
LabrooAparna A., and LeeAngela Y. (2006), “Between Two Brands: A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (August), 374–85.
24.
LeeAngela Y., and AakerJennifer L. (2004), “Bringing the Frame into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (2), 205–218.
25.
LeeAngela Y., and GardnerWendi L. (2000), “The Pleasures and Pains of Distinct Self-Construals: The Role of Interdependence in Regulatory Focus,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (6), 1122–34.
26.
LevinIrwin P., SchneiderSandra L., and GaethGary J. (1998), “All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76 (2), 149–88.
27.
LockwoodPenelope, JordanChristian H., and KundaZiva (2002), “Motivation by Positive or Negative Role Models: Regulatory Focus Determines Who Will Best Inspire Us,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (4), 854–64.
28.
LouroMaria J., PietersRik, and ZeelenbergMarcel (2005), “Negative Return on Positive Emotions: The Influence of Pride and Self-Regulatory Goals on Repurchase Decisions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (March), 833–40.
29.
MayJanet K., and KoesterArdis W. (1985), “Clothing Purchase Practices of Adolescents,”Home Economics Research Journal, 13 (3), 226–36.
30.
OlneyThomas J., HolbrookMorris B., and BatraRajeev (1991), “Consumer Responses to Advertising: The Effects of Ad Content, Emotions, and Attitude Toward the Ad on Viewing Time,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March), 440–53.
31.
PalmgreenPhilip, DonohewLewis, LorchElizabeth Pugzles, HoyleRick H., and StephensonMichael T. (2001), “Television Campaigns and Adolescent Marijuana Use: Tests of Sensation Seeking Targeting,”American Journal of Public Health, 91 (February), 292–96.
32.
PechmannCornelia, LevineLinda, LoughlinSandra, and LeslieFrances (2005), “Impulsive and Self-Conscious: Adolescents’ Vulnerability to Advertising and Promotion,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24 (Fall), 202–221.
33.
PechmannCornelia, and RatneshwarS. (1992), “Consumer Covariation Judgments: Theory or Data Driven?”Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (December), 373–86.
34.
PechmannCornelia, ZhaoGuangzhi, GoldbergMarvin E., and ReiblingEllen T. (2003), “What to Convey in Antismoking Advertisements for Adolescents: The Use of Protection Motivation Theory to Identify Effective Message Themes,”Journal of Marketing, 67 (April), 1–18.
35.
PhamMichel Tuan (1996), “Cue Representation and Selection Effects of Arousal in Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (March), 373–87.
36.
PhamMichel Tuan, and AvnetTamar (2004), “Ideals and Oughts and the Reliance on Affect Versus Substance in Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (March), 503–518.
37.
RothmanAlexander J., and SaloveyPeter (1997), “Shaping Perceptions to Motivate Healthy Behavior: The Role of Message Framing,”Psychological Bulletin, 121 (1), 3–19.
38.
SchneiderTamera R., SaloveyPeter, PallonenUnto, MundorfNorbert, SmithNelson F., and StewardWayne T. (2001), “Visual and Auditory Message Framing Effects on Tobacco Smoking,”Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31 (4), 667–82.
39.
SheppardBlair H., HartwickJon, and WarshawPaul R. (1988), “The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (December), 325–43.
40.
WangJing, and LeeAngela Y. (2006), “The Role of Regulatory Focus in Preference Construction,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (February), 28–38.
WilsonDawn K., WallstonKenneth A., and KingJoan E. (1990), “Effects of Contract Framing, Motivation to Quit, and Self-Efficacy on Smoking Reduction,”Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20 (7), 531–47.
44.
WongCarissa O., and McMurrayNancy E. (2002), “Framing Communication: Communicating the Antismoking Message Effectively to All Smokers,”Journal of Community Psychology, 30 (4), 433–47.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
