Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The authors propose an empirical procedure to investigate the pricing behavior of manufacturers and retailers in the presence of state-dependent demand. Rather than assuming that firms are perfectly forward looking and therefore solving accordingly for dynamic equilibriums that would arise in the presence of state dependence, the authors systematically evaluate whether boundedly rational firms indeed look ahead when they set prices and, if so, to what extent. They illustrate the procedure using household-level scanner-panel data on breakfast cereals and replicate the substantive results using data on ketchup. The authors find that (1) omission of state dependence in demand biases inference of firm behavior (i.e., tacit collusion is erroneously inferred when firms are competitive); (2) observed retail prices are consistent with a pricing model in which both manufacturers and retailers are forward looking (i.e., they incorporate the effects of their current prices on their future profits), but firms have short time horizons when setting prices (i.e., they look ahead by only one period, suggesting that firms are boundedly rational in their dynamic pricing behavior); and (3) even a myopic pricing model of firms that accounts for state dependence in demand is a reasonable approximation of the observed prices in the market.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berry

Steve

, and Pakes

Ariel

(2000), “Estimation from the First-Order Conditions for Dynamic Controls,” working paper, Department of Economics, Yale University.

Besanko

David

, Gupta

Sachin

, and Jain

Dipak

(1998), “Logit Demand Estimation Under Competitive Pricing Behavior: An Equilibrium Framework,” Management Science, 44 (11), 1533–47.

Camerer

Colin F.

, Ho

Teck Hua

, and Chong

Juin-Kuan

(2004), “A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 (3), 861–98.

Chakravarti

Dipankar

, Mitchell

Andrew

, and Staelin

Richard

(1979), “Judgment-Based Marketing Decision Models: An Experimental Investigation of the Decision Calculus Approach,” Management Science, 25 (3), 251–62.

Erdem

Tulin

(1996), “A Dynamic Analysis of Market Structure Based on Panel Data,” Marketing Science, 15 (4), 359–78.

Fader

Peter S.

, and Hardie

Bruce G.S.

(1996), “Modeling Consumer Choice Among SKUs,” Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (November), 442–52.

Freimer

Marshall

, and Horsky

Dan

(2004), “Try It, You Will Like It: Does Consumer Learning Lead to Competitive Price Promotion?” working paper, Simon School of Business, University of Rochester.

Guadagni

Peter E.

, and Little

John D.C.

(1983), “A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data,” Marketing Science, 2 (2), 203–238.

Hausman

Jerry A.

, and McFadden

Daniel

(1984), “Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model,” Econometrica, 52 (5), 1219–40.

10.

Teck H.

, Camerer

Colin

, and Lim

Noah

(2006), “Modeling the Psychology of Consumer and Firm Behavior Using Behavioral Economics,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (August), 307–331.

11.

Teck H.

, and Chong

Juin-Kuan

(2003), “A Parsimonious Model of Stockkeeping-Unit Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (August), 351–65.

12.

Jeuland

Abel

(1979), “Brand Choice Inertia as One Aspect of the Notion of Brand Loyalty,” Management Science, 25 (July), 671–82.

13.

Kadiyali

Vrinda

(1996), “Entry, Its Deterrence, and Its Accommodation: A Study of the U.S. Photographic Film Industry,” The Rand Journal of Economics, 27 (3), 452–78.

14.

Kadiyali

Vrinda

, Sudhir

, and Rao

Vithala R.

(2001), “Structural Analysis of Competitive Behavior: New Empirical Industrial Organization Methods in Marketing,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18 (2), 161–86.

15.

Kahn

Barbara E.

, Kalwani

Manohar

, and Morrison

Donald

(1986), “Measuring Variety Seeking and Reinforcement Behaviors Using Panel Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (February), 89–100.

16.

Kamakura

Wagner A.

, and Russell

Gary J.

(1989), “A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (November), 379–90.

17.

Keane

Michael P.

(1997), “Modeling Heterogeneity and State Dependence in Consumer Choice Behavior,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15 (3), 310–27.

18.

Klemperer

Paul

(1987), “Markets with Consumer Switching Costs,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102 (2), 375–94.

19.

Kopalle

Praveen K.

, Mela

Carl F.

, and Marsh

Lawrence

(1999), “The Dynamic Effect of Discounting on Sales: Empirical Analysis and Normative Pricing Implications,” Marketing Science, 18 (3), 317–32.

20.

Lattin

James M.

, and McAlister

Leigh

(1985), “Using a Variety-Seeking Model to Identify Substitute and Complementary Relationships Among Competing Products,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (August), 330–39.

21.

Lee

Jack

, Sudhir

, and Steckel

Joel

(2002), “A Multiple Ideal Point Model: Capturing Multiple Preference Effects from Within an Ideal Point Framework,” Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (February), 73–86.

22.

McFadden

Daniel

(1980), “Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice,” in Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, C. Manski and D. McFadden, eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 198–272.

23.

McIntyre

Shelby H.

(1982), “An Experimental Study of the Impact of Judgment-Based Marketing Models,” Management Science, 28 (1), 17–33.

24.

Meyer

Robert J.

, and Wesley Hutchinson

(2001), Bumbling Geniuses: The Power of Everyday Reasoning in Multistage Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 37–62.

25.

Nevo

Aviv

(2001), “Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry,” Econometrica, 69 (2), 307–342.

26.

Newey

West K.

, and McFadden

Daniel

(1994), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4. New York: Elsevier.

27.

Roy

Abhik

, Hanssens

Dominique M.

, and Raju

Jagmohan S.

(1994), “Competitive Pricing by a Price Leader,” Management Science, 40 (7), 809–823.

28.

Roy

Rishin

, Chintagunta

Pradeep

, and Haldar

Sudeep

(1996), “A Framework for Analyzing Habits, ‘Hand-of-Past, ‘ and Heterogeneity in Dynamic Brand Choice,” Marketing Science, 15 (3), 280–99.

29.

Seetharaman

P.B.

(2004), “Modeling Multiple Sources of State Dependence in Random Utility Models: A Distributed Lag Approach,” Marketing Science, 23 (2), 263–71.

30.

Seetharaman

P.B.

, Ainslie

Andrew

, and Chintagunta

Pradeep K.

(1999), “Investigating Household State Dependence Effects Across Categories,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (November), 488–500.

31.

Seetharaman

P.B.

, and Che

Hai

(in press), “Price Competition in Markets with Consumer Variety Seeking,” Marketing Science, forthcoming.

32.

Sudhir

(2001a), “Competitive Pricing Behavior in the Auto Market: A Structural Analysis,” Marketing Science, 20 (1), 42–60.

33.

Sudhir

(2001b), “Structural Analysis of Manufacturer Pricing in the Presence of a Strategic Retailer,” Marketing Science, 20 (3), 244–64.

34.

Trivedi

Minakshi

, Bass

Frank M.

, and Rao

Ram C.

(1994), “A Model of Stochastic Variety-Seeking,” Marketing Science, 13 (3), 274–97.

35.

Villas-Boas

J. Miguel

(2004), “Consumer Learning, Brand Loyalty, and Competition,” Marketing Science, 23 (1), 134–45.

36.

Villas-Boas , and Winer

Russell S.

(1999), “Endogeneity in Brand Choice Models,” Management Science, 45 (10), 1324–38.

37.

Villas-Boas , and Zhao

Ying

(2005), “Retailer, Manufacturers, and Individual Consumers: Modeling the Supply Side in the Ketchup Marketplace,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (February), 83–95.

38.

Villas-Boas

Sofia B.

(2004), “Vertical Contracts Between Manufacturers and Retailers: An Empirical Analysis,” working paper, University of California at Berkeley.

39.

Walters

Rockney

(1991), “Assessing the Impact of Retail Price Promotions on Product Substitution, Complementary Purchase, and Interstore Sales Displacement,” Journal of Marketing, 55 (April), 17–28.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.28 MB

0.00 MB

Bounded Rationality in Pricing under State-Dependent Demand: Do Firms Look Ahead,and if So,How Far?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material