From cooking kits to home improvement shows, consumers are increasingly seeking out products that are designed to help them be creative. In this research, the authors examine why consumers participate in creative activities and under what conditions these experiences are the most enjoyable. A qualitative study explores the diverse motivations for undertaking creative tasks and identifies the role of constraints in such endeavors. Then, the authors conduct two experimental studies to understand the importance of constraints (e.g., instructional guidance, target outcomes) in facilitating a balance between perceived competence and autonomy for consumers involved in a creative task. When consumers engage in creative activities with a sense of both autonomy and competence, they enjoy the experience more. The authors discuss implications for managers and provide opportunities for further research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaJoseph W., and Wesley HutchinsonJ. (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (March), 411–54.
2.
BaronReuben M., and KennyDavid A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173–82.
3.
BirdWilliam L. (2001), Paint-by-Number: The Craze That Swept the Nation.New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
4.
BurroughsJames E., and MickDavid Glen (2004), “Exploring Antecedents and Consequences of Consumer Creativity in a Problem-Solving Context,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (December), 402–411.
5.
ChiuChi-yue, HongYing-yi, and DweckCarol S. (1997), “Lay Dispositionism and Implicit Theories of Personality,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (1), 19–30.
6.
CorbinJuliet, and StraussAnselm (1990), “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria,”Qualitative Sociology, 13 (1), 3–21.
CsikszentmihalyiMihaly (2000), “The Costs and Benefits of Consuming,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (September), 267–72.
9.
DahlDarren W., and MoreauPage (2002), “The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking During New Product Ideation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (February), 47–60.
10.
DeCharmsRichard (1968), Personal Causation.New York: Academic Press.
11.
DeciEdward L., and RyanRichard M. (1985), Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior.New York: Plenum.
12.
FisherC.D. (1978), “The Effects of Personal Control, Competence, and Extrinsic Reward Systems on Intrinsic Motivation,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21 (3), 273–88.
13.
GlaserBarney G., and StraussAnselm (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
14.
GoldenbergJacob, MazurskyDavid, and SolomonSorin (1999), “Toward Identifying the Inventive Templates of New Products: A Channeled Ideation Approach,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (May), 200–210.
15.
GuestGreg, BunceArwen, and JohnsonLaura (2006), “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability,”Field Methods, 18 (1), 59–82.
HolbrookMorris, ChestnutRobert, OlivaTerrence, and GreenleafEric (1984), “Play as a Consumption Experience: The Role of Emotions, Performance, and Personality in the Enjoyment of Games,”Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (September), 728–40.
19.
HolbrookMorris, and HirschmanElizabeth (1982), “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 132–41.
20.
HoltDouglas B. (1995), “How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption Practices,”Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (June), 1–17.
21.
KirmaniAmna, and CampbellMargaret C. (2004), “Goal Seeker and Persuasion Sentry: How Consumer Targets Respond to Interpersonal Marketing Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (March), 573–82.
22.
KowalJohn, and FortierMichelle S. (1999), “Motivational Determinants of Flow: Contributions from Self-Determination Theory,”Journal of Social Psychology, 139 (3), 355–68.
23.
KozinetsRobert V., SherryJohn F.Jr., StormDiana, DuhachekAdam, NuttavuthisitKrittinee, and Deberry-SpenceBenet (2004), “Ludic Agency and Retail Spectacle,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (December), 658–73.
24.
MoreauC. Page, and DahlDarren W. (2005), “Designing the Solution: The Impact of Constraints on Consumer Creativity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (June), 13–22.
25.
PenalozaLisa (1999), “Just Doing It: A Visual Ethnographic Study of Spectacular Consumption Behavior at Niketown”Consumption, Markets, and Culture, 2 (4), 337–400.
RyanRichard M. (1982), “Control and Information in the Intra-personal Sphere: An Extension of Cognitive Evaluation Theory,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 (3), 450–61.
28.
RyanRichard M., and DeciEdward L. (2000), “Self-Determination and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being,”American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68–79.
29.
SanbonmatsuDavid, KardesFrank, and HerrPaul (1992), “The Role of Prior Knowledge and Missing Information in Multiattribute Evaluation,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51 (1), 76–92.
30.
ShalleyChristina E., and Perry-SmithJill E. (2000), “Effects of Social-Psychological Factors on Creative Performance: The Role of Informational and Controlling Expected Evaluation and Modeling Experience,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84 (1), 1–22.
31.
SheldonKennon M., and ElliotAndrew J. (1999), “Goal Striving, Need Satisfaction, and Longitudinal Well-Being: The Self-Concordance Model,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (3), 482–97.
32.
SherryJohn F.Jr. (1998), “The Soul of the Company Store: Nike Town Chicago and the Emplaced Brandscape,” in Service-Scapes: The Concept of Place in Contemporary Markets, John F. Sherry, Jr., ed. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books, 109–46.
33.
SternbergRobert J., and DessNancy K. (2001), “Creativity for the New Millennium,”American Psychologist, 56 (4), 332.
34.
StraussAnselm, and CorbinJuliet (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35.
WallendorfMelanie, and BelkRuss (1989), “Assessing Trustworthiness in Naturalistic Consumer Research,” in Interpretivist Consumer Research, Elizabeth Hirschman, ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 69–84.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
