Three experiments show that the source of price change information—whether human or nonhuman—moderates the effect of price change on perceptions of price fairness. Both inferences of the marketer's motive and stimulus-induced affect mediate the effects of the source and price change. Opportunity and motivation to process also affect the relative influence of inferred motive and affect. This research demonstrates antecedent roles of both price source and affect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenIcek (2001), “Nature and Operation of Attitudes,”Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.
2.
BarghJohn A. (2002), “Losing Consciousness: Automatic Influences on Consumer Judgment, Behavior, and Motivation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (September), 280–85.
3.
BaronReuban M., and KennyDavid A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173–82.
4.
BerkowitzLeonard (1993), “Towards a General Theory of Anger and Emotional Aggression: Implications of the Cognitive-Neoassociationistic Perspective for the Analysis of Anger and Other Emotions,” in Advances in Social Cognition, Vol. 6, WyerRobert S., and SrullThomas K., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1–46.
5.
BlinderAlan S. (1991), “Why Are Prices So Sticky? Preliminary Results from an Interview Study,”American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 81 (May), 89–100.
6.
BoltonLisa, WarlopLuk, and AlbaJoseph W. (2003), “Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)fairness,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (March), 474–91.
7.
BrownChristina L., and KrishnaAradhna (2004), “The Skeptical Shopper: A Metacognitive Account for the Effects of Default Options on Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (December), 529–39.
8.
CampbellMargaret C. (1999a), “Perceptions of Price Unfairness: Antecedents and Consequences,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (May), 187–99.
9.
CampbellMargaret C. (1999b), “Why Did You Do That? The Important Role of Inferred Motive in Perceptions of Price Fairness,”Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8 (2), 145–52.
10.
CampbellMargaret C., and KirmaniAmna (2000), “Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (June), 69–83.
11.
DamasioAntonio (1994), Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain.New York: Putnam.
12.
DicksonPeter R., and KalapurakalRosemary (1994), “The Use and Perceived Fairness of Price-Setting Rules in the Bulk Electricity Market,”Journal of Economic Psychology, 15 (3), 427–48.
13.
EaglyAlice, and ChaikenShelly (1993), The Psychology of Attitudes.Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
14.
RobertFranciosi, KujalPraveen, MichelitschRoland, SmithVernon, and DengGang (1995), “Fairness: Effect on Temporary and Equilibrium Prices in Posted-Offer Markets,”Economic Journal, 105 (431), 938–50.
15.
GilbertDaniel T., and MalonePatrick S. (1995), “The Correspondence Bias,”Psychological Bulletin, 117 (1), 21–38.
16.
GilbertDaniel T., PelhamBrett W., and KrullDouglas S. (1988), “On Cognitive Busyness: When Person Perceivers Meet Persons Perceived,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (May), 733–40.
17.
GreenStephen G., and MitchellTerence R. (1979), “Attributional Processes of Leaders in Leader-Member Interactions,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23 (June), 429–58.
18.
GuthWerner, SchmittbergerRolf, and SchwarzeBernd (1982), “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3 (December), 367–88.
19.
HaidtJonathan (2001), “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment,”Psychological Review, 108 (October), 814–34.
20.
HeiderFritz (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
HochStephen J., and LoewensteinGeorge F. (1991), “Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March), 492–507.
22.
KahnemanDaniel, KnetschJack L., and ThalerRichard (1986a), “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics,”Journal of Business, 59 (4), S285–S300.
23.
KahnemanDaniel, KnetschJack L., and ThalerRichard (1986b), “Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market,”The American Economic Review, 76 (4), 728–41.
24.
KirmaniAmna, and CampbellMargaret C. (2004), “Goal Seeker and Persuasion Sentry: How Consumer Targets Respond to Interpersonal Marketing Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (December), 573–82.
25.
LauRichard R., SearsDavid O., and CentersRichard (1979), “The ‘Positivity Bias’ in Evaluations of Public Figures: Evidence Against Instrument Artifacts,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 43 (Fall), 347–58.
26.
LeDouxJoseph E. (1996), The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life.New York: Simon & Schuster.
27.
LoewensteinGeorge F., WeberElke U., HseeChristopher K., and WelchNed (2001), “Risk as Feelings,”Psychological Bulletin, 127 (2), 267–86.
28.
MarkovskyBarry (1988), “Injustice and Arousal,”Social Justice Research, 2 (September), 223–33.
29.
MoonHenry, and ConlonDonald E. (2002), “From Acclaim to Blame: Evidence of a Person Sensitivity Decision Bias,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (February), 33–42.
30.
MoonYoungme (2000), “Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (March), 323–40.
31.
MullerDominique, JuddCharles M., and YzerbytVincent Y. (2005), “When Moderation Is Mediated and Mediation Is Moderated,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 852–63.
32.
PetersEllen, and SlovicPaul (2000), “The Springs of Action: Affective and Analytical Information Processing in Choice,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26 (12), 1465–75.
33.
PhamMichel Tuan (1998), “Representativeness, Relevance, and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (September), 144–59.
34.
PhamMichel Tuan, CohenJoel B., PracejusJohn W., and David HughesG. (2001), “Affect Monitoring and the Primacy of Feelings in Judgment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (September), 167–88.
35.
PironRobert, and FernandezLuis (1995), “Are Fairness Constraints on Profit-Seeking Important?”Journal of Economic Psychology, 16 (1), 73–96.
36.
RookKaren S., SearsDavid O., KinderDonald R., and LauRichard R. (1978), “The ‘Positivity Bias’ in Evaluations of Public Figures: Evidence Against Interpersonal Artifacts,”Political Methodology, 5 (December), 469–99.
37.
RosenbaumMilton E. (1986), “The Repulsion Hypothesis: On the Nondevelopment of Relationships,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1156–66.
38.
SchwarzNorbert (2000), “Social Judgment and Attitudes: Warmer, More Social, and Less Conscious,”European Journal of Social Psychology, 30 (March-April), 149–76.
39.
SchwarzNorbert, and CloreGerald L. (1996), “Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences,” in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, Tory HigginsE., and KruglanskiA., eds. New York: Guilford Press, 433–65.
40.
SearsDavid O. (1983), “The Person-Positivity Bias,”Journal of Personality and Social Pscyhology, 44 (2), 233–50.
41.
ShivBaba, and FedorikhinAlexander (1999), “Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (December), 278–92.
WyerRobert S., CloreGerald L., and IsbellLinda M. (1999), “Affect and Information Processing,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 31, ZannaMark P. ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1–77.
44.
XiaLan, MonroeKent B., and CoxJennifer L. (2004), “The Price Is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework of Price Fairness Perceptions,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (October), 1–15.
