The authors show that deceptive advertising engenders distrust, which negatively affects people's responses to subsequent advertising from both the same source and second-party sources. This negative bias operates through a process of defensive stereotyping, in which the initial deception induces negative beliefs about advertising and marketing in general, thus undermining the credibility of further advertising.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsJ. Craig, and MaronickThomas J. (1995), “Advertising Research Issues from FTC Versus Stouffer Foods Corporation,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 14 (Fall), 301–327.
2.
ArensWilliam F. (2006), Contemporary Advertising, 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
3.
BalotaDavid A., and PaulStephen T. (1996), “Summation of Activation: Evidence from Multiple Primes That Converge and Diverge Within Semantic Memory,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22 (July), 827–45.
4.
BarghJohn A., LombardiWendy J., and Tory HigginsE. (1988), “Automaticity of Chronically Accessible Constructs in Person x Situation Effects on Person Perception: It's Just a Matter of Time,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 (October), 599–605.
5.
BurkeSandra J., MilbergSandra J., and MoeWendy W. (1997), “Displaying Common but Previously Neglected Health Claims on Product Labels: Understanding Competitive Advantages, Deception, and Education,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16 (Fall), 242–55.
6.
BushmanBrad J., and BonacciAngela M. (2002), “Violence and Sex Impair Memory for Television Ads,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (June), 557–64.
7.
CampbellMargaret C., and KirmaniAmna (2000), “Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (June), 69–83.
8.
ChaikenShelly, Giner-SorollaRoger, and ChenSerena (1996), “Beyond Accuracy: Defense and Impression Motives in Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing,” in The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior, GollwitzerPeter M., and BarghJohn A., eds. New York: Guilford Press, 553–78.
9.
ChaikenShelly, and MaheswaranDurairaj (1994), “Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 (March), 460–73.
10.
ChaikenShelly, and TropeYaacov (1999), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology.New York: Guilford Press.
11.
ChenSerena, and ChaikenShelly (1999), “The Heuristic-Systematic Model in Its Broader Context,” in Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, ChaikenShelly, and TropeYaacov, eds. New York: Guilford Press, 73–96.
12.
DarkePeter R. (2004), “Consumer Reactions to Marketing Practices: Skepticism, Suspicion, and Payback,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 31, KahnBarbara E., and LuceMary Frances, eds. Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research, 329–32.
13.
DarkePeter R., and ChaikenShelly (2005), “The Pursuit of Self-Interest: Self-Interest Bias in Attitude Judgment and Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (December), 864–83.
14.
DasguptaNilanjana, and GreenwaldAnthony G. (2001), “On the Malleability of Automatic Attitudes: Combating Automatic Prejudice with Images of Admired and Disliked Individuals,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (November), 800–814.
15.
DrumwrightMinette E., and MurphyPatrick E. (2004), “How Advertising Practitioners View Ethics,”Journal of Advertising, 33 (Summer), 7–24.
16.
FeinSteven, HiltonJames L., and MillerDale T. (1990), “Suspicion of Ulterior Motivation and the Correspondence Bias,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 (May), 753–64.
17.
FiskeSusan T., and TaylorShelley E. (1984), Social Cognition.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
FordGary T., SmithDarlene B., and SwasyJohn L. (1990), “Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (March), 433–41.
19.
FriestadMarian, and WrightPeter (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (June), 1–31.
20.
GardnerDavid M. (1975), “Deception in Advertising: A Conceptual Approach,”Journal of Marketing, 39 (January), 40–46.
21.
Giner-SorollaRoger, and ChaikenShelly (1997), “Selective Use of Heuristic and Systematic Processing Under Defense Motivation,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23 (January), 84–97.
22.
Ipsos-Reid (2003), “So, Whom Do We Trust?” press release, (January 22).
23.
JoharGita V. (1995), “Consumer Involvement and Deception from Implied Advertising Claims,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (August), 267–79.
24.
JoharGita V. (1996), “Intended and Unintended Effects of Corrective Advertising on Beliefs and Evaluations: An Exploratory Analysis,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5 (3), 209–230.
25.
KramerRoderick M. (1998), “Paranoid Cognition in Social Systems: Thinking and Acting in the Shadow of Doubt,”Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2 (4), 251–75.
26.
KramerRoderick M. (1999), “Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions,”Annual Review of Psychology, 50 (1), 569–98.
27.
LibermanAkiva, and ChaikenShelly (1992), “Defensive Processing of Personally Relevant Health Messages,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18 (December), 669–79.
28.
MainKelley J., DahlDarren W., and DarkePeter R. (2007), “Consumer Responses to Flattery During Sales Transactions: Empirical Evidence of the Sinister Attribution Error,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17 (January), forthcoming.
29.
MorrinMaureen, and RatneshwarS. (2003), “Does It Make Sense to Use Scents to Enhance Brand Memory?”Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (February), 10–25.
30.
NyeJoseph S.Jr., ZelikowPhilip D., and KingDavid C., eds. (1997), Why People Don't Trust Government.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
ObermillerCarl, and SpangenbergEric R. (1998), “Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism Toward Advertising,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7 (2), 159–86.
32.
ObermillerCarl, and SpangenbergEric R. (2000), “On the Origin and Distinctiveness of Skepticism Towards Advertising,”Marketing Letters, 11 (November), 311–22.
33.
PettyRichard E., and CacioppoJohn T. (1986), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19 (1), 123–205.
34.
PettyRichard E., CacioppoJohn T., and SchumannDavid (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (September), 135–46.
35.
PollayRichard W. (1986), “The Distorted Mirror: Reflections on the Unintended Consequences of Advertising,”Journal of Marketing, 50 (April), 18–36.
36.
PollayRichard W., and MittalBanwari (1993), “Here's the Beef: Factors, Determinants, and Segments in Consumer Criticism of Advertising,”Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 99–115.
37.
PriesterJoseph R., and PettyRichard E. (1995), “Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (June), 637–54.
38.
RichardsJef I., and PrestonIvan L. (1992), “Proving and Disproving Materiality of Deceptive Advertising Claims,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11 (Fall), 45–56.
39.
RitchieRobin J.B. (2004), “Giving Advertisers the Benefit of the Doubt: Trust, Cooperative Communication, and Consumer Acceptance of Implication in Advertising, ” doctoral dissertation, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia.
40.
RotterJulian B. (1967), “A New Scale for the Measurement of Interpersonal Trust,”Journal of Personality, 35 (4), 651–65.
41.
ShimpTerence A. (1978), “Do Incomplete Comparisons Mislead?”Journal of Advertising Research, 18 (December), 21–27.
42.
ShimpTerence A., and PrestonIvan L. (1981), “Deceptive and Nondeceptive Consequences of Evaluative Advertising,”Journal of Marketing, 45 (Winter), 22–32.
43.
SinclairLisa, and KundaZiva (1999), “Reactions to a Black Professional: Motivated Inhibition and Activation of Conflicting Stereotypes,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (November), 885–904.
44.
SnyderRita (1989), “Misleading Characteristics of Implied-Superiority Claims,”Journal of Advertising, 18 (Winter), 54–61.
45.
SpencerSteven J., FeinSteven, WolfeConnie T., FongChristina, and DunnMeghan A. (1998), “Automatic Activation of Stereotypes: The Role of Self-Image Threat,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24 (November), 1139–52.
46.
SrullThomas K., and WyerRobert S. (1980), “Category Accessibility and Social Perception: Some Implications for the Study of Person Memory and Interpersonal Judgments,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38 (6), 841–56.
47.
UrbanyJoel E., BeardenWilliam O., and WeilbakerDan C. (1988), “The Effect of Plausible and Exaggerated Reference Prices on Consumer Perceptions and Price Search,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (June), 95–110.
