Three experiments identify conditions under which a brand scandal spills over and negatively affects attitudes and beliefs about the product category and about competing brands. The research also examines factors that may enhance or reduce the likelihood of spillover effects and strategies for responding to scandal spillover.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhluwaliaRohini, BurnkrantRobert E., and Rao UnnavaH. (2000), “Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (May), 203–214.
2.
AhluwaliaRohini, and Gurhan-CanliZeynep (2000), “The Effects of Extensions on the Family Brand Name: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (December), 371–81.
3.
AhluwaliaRohini, Rao UnnavaH., and BurnkrantRobert E. (2001), “The Moderating Role of Commitment on the Spillover Effect of Marketing Communications,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (November), 458–70.
4.
AlbaJoseph, and HutchinsonWes (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (March), 411–54.
5.
AndersonJohn R. (1983), The Architecture of Cognition.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BalachanderSubramanian, and GhoseSanjoy (2003), “Reciprocal Spillover Effects: A Strategic Benefit of Brand Extensions,”Journal of Marketing, 67 (January), 4–13.
7.
BarsalouLawrence W. (1985), “Ideals, Central Tendency, and Frequency of Instantiation as Determinants of Graded Structure in Categories,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11 (October), 629–54.
8.
BarsalouLawrence W. (1992), Cognitive Psychology: An Overview for Cognitive Scientists.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
BroniarczykSusan M., and AlbaJoseph W. (1994a), “The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension,”Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (May), 214–28.
10.
BroniarczykSusan M., and AlbaJoseph W. (1994b), “The Role of Consumers' Intuitions in Inference Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (December), 393–407.
11.
ClarkH.H. (1985), “Language Use and Language Users,” in Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, AronsonElliot, ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 179–232.
12.
CollinsAllan M., and LoftusElizabeth F. (1975), “A Spreading Activation Theory of Semantic Processing,”Psychological Review, 82 (6), 407–428.
13.
DawarNiraj, and PillutlaMadan M. (2000), “Impact of Product-Harm Crises on Brand Equity: The Moderating Role of Consumer Expectations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (May), 215–26.
14.
FeldmanJack M., and LynchJohn G. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (August), 421–35.
15.
GruenfeldDeborah H., and WyerRobert S. (1992), “Semantics and Pragmatics of Social Influence: How Affirmations and Denials Affect Beliefs in Referent Propositions,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (January), 38–49.
16.
IyengarShanto, and KinderDonald R. (1987), News That Matters: Television and American Opinion.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
JohnDeborah Roedder, LokenBarbara, and JoinerChristopher (1998), “The Negative Impact of Extensions: Can Flagship Products Be Diluted?”Journal of Marketing, 62 (January), 19–32.
18.
MaurerKristin L., ParkBernadette, and RothbartMyron (1995), “Subtyping Versus Subgrouping Processes in Stereotype Representation,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (November), 812–24.
19.
MoskowitzGordon B., and SkurnikIan W. (1999), “Contrast Effects as Determined by Type of Prime: Trait Versus Exemplar Primes Initiate Processing Strategies That Differ in How Accessible Constructs Are Used,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (June), 911–27.
20.
SchwarzNorbert, and BlessHerbert (1992), “Constructing Reality and Its Alternatives: An Inclusion/Exclusion Model of Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Social Judgment,” in The Construction of Social Judgments, MartinLeonard L., and TesserAbraham, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 217–45.
21.
SujanMita (1985), “Consumer Knowledge: Effects of Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (June), 31–46.
22.
SujanMita, and BettmanJames R. (1989), “The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers' Brand and Category Perceptions: Some Insights from Schema Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (November), 454–67.
23.
TyboutAlice M., CalderBobby J., and SternthalBrian (1981), “Using Information-Processing Theory to Design Marketing Strategies,”Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (February), 73–79.
24.
ValloneRobert P., RossLee, and LepperMark R. (1985), “The Hostile Media Phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the Beirut Massacre,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 (September), 577–85.