Researchers have long debated the methodological necessity of monetary incentives in experimental research. The current work shows that financial incentives not only can fail to improve task performance but also can worsen it. Three studies verify that incentives can elevate mood and that this mood enhancement contributes to worsened task performance. The authors discuss implications for the use of incentives in experimental research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaJoseph W., and Wesley HutchinsonJ. (2000), “Knowledge Calibration: What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (September), 123–56.
2.
AllenChris T., and JaniszewskiChris A. (1989), “Assessing the Role of Contingency Awareness in Attitudinal Conditioning with Implications for Advertising Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (February), 30–43.
3.
ArkesHal R., DawesRobyn M., and ChristiansenCaryn (1986), “Factors Influencing the Use of a Decision Rule in a Probabilistic Task,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37 (February), 93–110.
4.
AshtonRobert H. (1990), “Pressure and Performance in Accounting Decision Settings: Paradoxical Effects of Incentives, Feedback and Justification,”Journal of Accounting Research, 28 (Supplement), 148–80.
5.
BahrickHarry P. (1954), “Incidental Learning Under Two Incentive Conditions,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47 (3), 170–72.
6.
Bargh JohnA., and ChartrandTanya (1999), “The Unbearable Automaticity of Being,”American Psychologist, 54 (July), 462–79.
7.
BaronReuben M., and KennyDavid. A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (December), 1173–82.
8.
BeelerJesse D., and HuntonJames E. (1997), “The Influence of Compensation Method and Disclosure Level on Information Search Strategy and Escalation of Commitment,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10 (June), 77–91.
9.
BentlerP.M., and BonettDouglas G. (1980), “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures,”Psychological Bulletin, 88 (November), 588–606.
10.
BrowneMichael W., and CudeckRobert (1992), “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit,”Sociological Methods and Research, 21 (2), 230–58.
11.
CamererColin F., and HogarthRobin M. (1999), “The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19 (December), 7–42.
12.
CamererColin F., and LovalloDan (1999), “Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach,”American Economic Review, 89 (March), 306–318.
13.
CarlsonKurt A., MeloyMargaret G., and Edward RussoJ. (2006), “Leader-Driven Primacy: Using Atttribute Order to Affect Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, forthcoming.
14.
CarlsonKurt A., and Edward RussoJ. (2001), “Biased Interpretation of Evidence by Mock Jurors,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7 (June), 91–103.
15.
CloreGerald L., and MartinLeonard L. (2001), Theories of Mood and Cognition: A User's Guidebook.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
DeciEdward L. (1971), “Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18 (April), 105–115.
17.
EisenbergerRobert, and CameronJudy (1996), “Detrimental Effects of Reward: Reality or Myth?”American Psychologist, 51 (November), 1153–66.
18.
ForgasJoseph P. (2001), Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
GneezyUri, and RustichiniAldo (2000), “Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, (August), 791–810.
20.
HeymanJames, and ArielyDan (2004), “Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets,”Psychological Science, 15 (11), 787–93.
21.
HogarthRobin M., GibbsBrian H., McKenzieCraig R., and MarquisMargaret A. (1991), “Learning from Feedback: Exacting-ness and Incentives,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17 (July), 734–52.
22.
HopeLorraine, MemonAmima, and McGeorgePeter (2004), “Understanding Pretrial Publicity: Predecisional Distortion of Evidence by Mock Jurors,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10 (2), 111–19.
23.
HullandJohn S., and KleinmuntzDonald N. (1994), “Factors Influencing the Use of Internal Summary Evaluations Versus External Information in Choice,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7 (June), 79–102.
24.
IsenAlice M., and StokkerLaura G. (1993), “The Influence of Positive Affect and Meaningful Loss on Decisions to Cut One's Losses in Sunk-Cost Situations,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Washington, DC (November 7–8).
25.
JamalKarim, and SunderShyam (1991), “Money Vs. Gaming: Effects of Salient Monetary Payments in Double Oral Auctions,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49 (June), 151–66.
26.
KlaymanJoshua, SollJack B., Gonzalez-VallejoClaudia, and BarlasSema (1999), “Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What and Whom You Ask,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79 (September), 216–47.
27.
LepperMark R., GreeneDavid, and NisbettRichard E. (1973), “Undermining Children's Intrinsic Interest with Extrinsic Rewards: A Test of the ‘Overjustification’ Hypothesis,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28 (October), 129–37.
28.
LevinIrwin P., ChapmanDaniel P., and JohnsonRichard D. (1988), “Confidence in Judgments Based on Incomplete Information: An Investigation Using Both Hypothetical and Real Gambles,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1 (March), 29–41.
29.
LewisMichael, and Haviland-JonesJeannette M. (2000), Handbook of Emotions, 2d ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
30.
MartinLeonard L., WardDavid W., AcheeJohn W., and WyerRobert S. (1993), “Mood as Input: People Have to Interpret the Motivational Implications of Their Moods,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 (March), 317–26.
31.
McGrawKenneth O. (1978), “The Detrimental Effects of Reward on Performance: A Literature Review and a Prediction Model,” in The Hidden Costs of Reward: New Perspectives on the Psychology of Human Motivation, LepperMark R., and GreeneDavid, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 33–60.
32.
MeloyMargaret G. (2000), “Mood-Driven Distortion of Product Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (December), 345–59.
33.
MeloyMargaret G., and Edward RussoJ. (2004), “Binary Choice Under Instructions to Select Versus Reject,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93 (March), 114–28.
34.
MurphyAllan, and WinklerRobert (1984), “Probability Forecasting in Meteorology,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79 (September), 489–500.
35.
NygrenThomas E., IsenAlice M., TaylorPamela J., and DulinJessica (1996), “The Influence of Positive Affect on the Decision Rule in Risk Situations: Focus on Outcome (and Especially Avoidance of Loss) Rather Than Probability,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66 (April), 59–72.
36.
OrdóñezLisa D., MellersBarbara A., ChangShi-Jie, and RobertsJordan (1995), “Are Preference Reversals Reduced When Made Explicit?”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8 (December), 265–77.
37.
PetersonRobert A., and SauberMatthew H. (1983), “A Mood Scale for Survey Research” in AMA Educators Proceedings, MurphyPatrick, FerrellO.C., LaczniakGene R., LuschRobert F., AndersonPaul F., ShimpTerence A., and BelkRussell W., and WeinbergCharles B., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 409–414.
38.
RussoJ. Edward, MedvecVictoria H., and MeloyMargaret G. (1996), “The Distortion of Information During Decisions,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66 (April), 102–110.
39.
RussoJ. Edward, MeloyMargaret G., and MedvecVictoria H. (1998), “Pre-decisional Distortion of Product Information,”Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (November), 438–52.
40.
RussoJ. Edward, MeloyMargaret G., and Jeffrey WilksT. (2000), “Predecisional Distortion of Information by Auditors and Salespersons,”Management Science, 46 (February), 13–27.
41.
RyanRichard M., and DeciEdward L. (2000), “When Rewards Compete with Nature: The Undermining of Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Regulation,” in Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance, SansoneCarol, and HarackiewiczJudith M., eds. San Diego: Academic Press, 13–54.
42.
ShahJames, Tory HigginsE., and FriedmanRonald S. (1998), “Performance Incentives and Means: How Regulatory Focus Influences Goal Attainment,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (February), 285–93.
43.
SobelM.E. (1982), “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models” in Sociological Methodology, LeinhardtSamuel, ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 290–310.
44.
WrightWilliam F., and Aboul-EzzMohamed E. (1988), “Effects of Extrinsic Incentives on the Quality of Frequency Assessments,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41 (April), 143–52.
