Spillover refers to the extent to which a message influences beliefs related to attributes that are not contained in the message. The authors find that when consumers are not familiar with a brand, negative information spills over to attributes that are associated with the target attribute but not mentioned in the message. However, positive information does not. When consumers like the brand, a spillover occurs for the positive information as well. When consumers are committed to the brand, the spillover of negative information is minimized, but positive information spills over more freely to other associated but unmentioned attributes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhluwaliaRohini, BurnkrantRobert E., and UnnavaH. Rao (2000), “Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (May), 203–14.
2.
BeattySharon E., KahleLynn R., and HomerPamela (1988), “The Involvement-Commitment Model: Theory and Implications,”Journal of Business Research, 16 (2), 149–67.
3.
BroniarczykSusan M., and AlbaJoseph W. (1994), “The Role of Consumers' Intuitions in Inference Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (3), 393–407.
4.
ChaikenShelly, LibermanAkiva, and EaglyAlice H. (1989), “Heuristic and Systematic Processing Within and Beyond the Persuasion Context,” in Unintended Thought, UlemanJ.S., and BarghJohn A., eds. New York: Guilford Press, 212–52.
5.
CioffiDelia, and GarnerRandy (1996), “On Doing the Decision: Effects of Active Versus Passive Choice on Commitment and Self-Perception,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (2), 133–47.
6.
DickAlan S., and BasuKunal (1994), “Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22 (2), 99–113.
7.
DickAlan S., ChakravartiDipankar, and BiehalGabriel (1990), “Memory-Based Inferences During Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (1), 82–93.
8.
EaglyAlice H., and ChaikenShelly (1995), “Attitude Strength, Attitude Structure, and Resistance to Change,” in Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, PettyRichard E., and KrosnickJon A., eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 269–322.
9.
EdwardsKari, and SmithEdward E. (1996), “A Disconfirmation Bias in the Evaluation of Arguments,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (1), 5–24.
10.
FazioRussel H. (1989), “On the Power and Functionality of Attitudes: The Role of Attitude Accessibility,” in Attitude Structure and Function, PratkanisA.R., BrecklerS.J., and GreenwaldA.G., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 153–79.
11.
FeldmanJack M., and LynchJohn G. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (August), 421–35.
12.
FishbeinMartin, and AjzenIcek (1981), “Acceptance, Yielding, and Impact: Cognitive Processes in Persuasion,” in Cognitive Responses in Persuasion, PettyR.E., OstromT.M., and BrockT.C., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 339–59.
13.
FiskeSusan T. (1980), “Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38 (6), 889–906.
14.
FournierSusan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (March), 343–73.
15.
FreyD. (1986), “Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, BerkowitzL., ed. New York: Academic Press, 41–80.
16.
Garcia-MarquesLeonel, and HamiltonDavid L. (1996), “Resolving the Apparent Discrepancy Between the Incongruency Effect and the Expectancy-Based Illusory Correlation Effect: The TRAP Model,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (5), 845–60.
17.
HalversonRichard R., and PallakMichael S. (1978), “Commitment, Ego-Involvement, and Resistance to Attack,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14 (1), 1–12.
18.
HerrPaul M., KardesFrank R., and KimJohn (1991), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March), 454–62.
19.
HomerPamela, and BatraRajeev (1994), “Attitudinal Effects of Character-Based Versus Competence-Based Negative Political Communications,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3 (2), 163–85.
20.
HuberJoel, and McCannJohn (1982), “The Impact of Inferential Beliefs on Product Evaluations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (August), 324–33.
21.
KaplanKalman J. (1972), “On the Ambivalence-Indifference Problem in Attitude Theory and Measurement: A Suggested Modification of the Semantic Differential Technique,”Psychological Bulletin, 77 (5), 361–72.
22.
KardesFrank R. (1988), “Spontaneous Inference Processes in Advertising: The Effects of Conclusion Omission and Involvement on Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 225–33.
23.
KardesFrank R., CronleyMaria L., PontesManuel J., and HoughtonDavid C. (2001), “Down the Garden Path: The Role of Conditional Inference Processes in Self-Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, forthcoming.
24.
KieslerCharles A. (1971), The Psychology of Commitment: Experiments Linking Behavior to Belief.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
KlarYechiel (1990), “Linking Structures and Sensitivity to Judgment-Relevant Information in Statistical and Logical Reasoning Tasks,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (5), 841–58.
26.
KundaZiva (1990), “The Case for Motivated Reasoning,”Psychological Bulletin, 108 (November), 480–98.
27.
LindskoldSvenn, and PropstL. Rebecca (1981), “Deindividuation, Self-Awareness, and Impression Management,” in Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research, TedeschiJ.T., ed. New York: Academic Press, 201–22.
28.
LokenBarbara, and JohnDeborah Roedder (1993), “Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact?”Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 71–84.
29.
LutzRichard J. (1975), “First-Order and Second-Order Cognitive Effects in Attitude Change,”Communication Research, 2 (3), 289–99.
30.
MaheswaranDurairaj, and Meyers-LevyJoan (1990), “The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement,”Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (August), 361–67.
31.
MenonGeeta, and RaghubirPriya (2000), “When Automatic Accessibility Meets Conscious Content: Implications for Judgment Formation,” working paper, Marketing Department, University of California at Berkeley.
32.
MiniardPaul W., BhatlaSunil, and RoseRandall L. (1990), “On the Formation and Relationship of Ad and Brand Attitudes: An Experimental and Causal Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (August), 290–303.
33.
PetersonRobert A., and WilsonWilliam R. (1992), “Measuring Customer Satisfaction: Fact and Artifact,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20 (Winter), 61–71.
34.
PettyRichard E., and CacioppoJohn T. (1977), “Forewarning, Cognitive Responding, and Resistance to Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (9), 645–55.
35.
PettyRichard E., and CacioppoJohn T. (1986), Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change.New York: Springer-Verlag.
36.
PettyRichard E., and KrosnickJon A. (1995), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
PettyRichard E., OstromThomas M., and BrockTimothy C. (1981), Cognitive Responses in Persuasion.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38.
PomerantzEva M., ChaikenShelly, and TordesillasRosalind S. (1995), “Attitude Strength and Resistance Process,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (September), 408–19.
39.
SanbonmatsuDavid M., KardesFrank R., and HerrPaul M. (1992), “The Role of Prior Knowledge and Missing Information in Multiattribute Evaluation,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51 (1), 76–79.
40.
SanbonmatsuDavid M., KardesFrank R., PosavacSteven S., and HoughtonDavid C. (1997), “Contextual Influences on Judgment Based on Limited Information,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69 (3), 251–64.
41.
SanbonmatsuDavid M., KardesFrank R., and SansoneCarol (1991), “Remembering Less and Inferring More: Effects of Time of Judgment on Inferences About Unknown Attributes,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (4), 546–54.
42.
SimmonsCarolyn J., and LynchJohn G.Jr. (1991), “Inference Effects Without Inference Making? Effects of Missing Information on Discounting and Use of Presented Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March), 477–91.
43.
SkowronskiJohn J., and CarlstonDonal E. (1989), “Negativity and Extremity in Impression Formation: A Review of Explanations,”Psychological Bulletin, 105 (January), 131–42.
44.
WhiteSusan, and SchneiderBenjamin (1998), “Climbing the Commitment Ladder: The Impact on Customer Commitment of Disconfirmation of Service Expectations,”Marketing Science Institute Working Paper No. 98-108.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
45.
ZimbardoP. G. (1970), “The Human Choice: Individuation, Reason, and Order Versus Deindividuation, Impulse, and Chaos,” in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 17, ArnoldW.J., and LevineD., eds. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 237–307.
