Scholars have expressed concern that marketing's influence at the strategic levels of the firm is waning. Consistent with this view, only 2.6% of firms’ board members have marketing experience. The authors suggest that this is shortsighted and that including more marketing-experienced board members (MEBMs) will increase firm growth by (1) helping firms prioritize growth as a strategic objective and (2) contributing their expertise to improve the effectiveness of revenue growth strategies. Drawing on the behavioral model of corporate governance, the authors develop a theoretical framework explicating the situational, dispositional, and structural influence moderators that alter the impact of MEBMs on firm growth. Using 64,086 director biographies from S&P 1500 firms, the authors find that MEBMs positively affect firm-level revenue growth and that this relationship is strengthened or weakened by important contingencies that occur in the firm. The findings suggest that the common practice of not including experienced marketers on boards of directors puts firms at a competitive disadvantage.
American Bar Association Committee on Corporate Laws (2007), Corporate Director's Guidebook, 5th ed.Chicago: American Bar Association, Section of Business Law.
3.
BarkerVincent L.III, and MuellerGeorge C (2002), “CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending,”Management Science, 48(6), 782–801.
4.
BoydEric D., ChandyRajesh K., and CunhaMarcusJr., (2010), “When Do Chief Marketing Officers Affect Firm Value? A Customer Power Explanation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1162–76.
5.
CertoS. Trevis, and SemadeniMatthew (2006), “Strategy Research and Panel Data: Evidence and Implications,”Journal of Management, 32(3), 449–71.
6.
ChakravartyAnindita, and GrewalRajdeep (2016), “Analyst Earning Forecasts and Advertising and R&D Budgets: Role of Agency Theoretic Monitoring and Bonding Costs,”Journal of Marketing Research, 53(4), 580–96.
DaltonDan R., DailyCatherine M., JohnsonJonathon L., and EllstrandAlan E. (1999), “Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis,”Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–86.
9.
DaltonDan R., HittMichael A., Trevis CertoS., and DaltonCatherine M. (2007), “The Fundamental Agency Problem and Its Mitigation: Independence, Equity, and the Market for Corporate Control,”Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 1–64.
10.
DaumJulie H., and WelchGreg (2013), “Myths and Opportunities: How Marketers Can Position Themselves for a Board Role,” (accessed January 15, 2014), https://www.spencerstuart.com/.
11.
DearbornDeWitt C., and SimonHerbert A. (1958), “Selective Perception: A Note on the Department Identifications of Executives,”Sociometry, 21(2), 140–44.
12.
DesenderKurt A., AguileraRuth V., Lopezpuertas-LamyMonica, and CrespiRafel (2016), “A Clash of Governance Logics: Foreign Ownership and Board Monitoring,”Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 349–69.
13.
DezsoCristian L., and RossDavid Gaddis (2012), “Does Female Representation in Top Management Improve Firm Performance? A Panel Data Investigation,”Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–89.
14.
DoughertyDeborah (1992), “Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms,”Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202.
15.
DoylePeter (2008), Value-Based Marketing: Marketing Strategies for Corporate Growth and Shareholder Value.Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
16.
DwyerRobert F., and OhSejo (1987), “Output Sector Munificence Effects on the Internal Political Economy of Marketing Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4), 347–58.
FamaEugene F., and JensenMichael C (1983), “The Separation of Ownership and Control,”Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301–25.
19.
FavaroPaul (2001), “Beyond Bean Counting: The CFO's Expanding Role,”Strategy and Leadership, 29(5), 4–8.
20.
FengHui, MorganNeil A., and RegoLopo L. (2015), “Marketing Department Power and Firm Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 79(5), 1–20.
21.
FengHui, MorganNeil A., and RegoLopo L. (2017), “Firm Capabilities and Growth: The Moderating Role of Market Conditions,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 76–92.
22.
FinkelsteinSydney, HambrickDonald C, and CannellaAlbert A. (2009), Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards.New York: Oxford University Press.
ForbesDaniel P., and MillikenFrances J. (1999), “Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups,”Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.
GermannFrank, EbbesPeter, and GrewalRajdeep (2015), “The Chief Marketing Officer Matters!”Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 1–22.
27.
GreeneWilliam H. (2008), Econometric Analysis, 6th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
GroysbergBoris, and BellDeborah (2012), “2012 Board of Directors Survey,” (accessed May 18, 2013), http://www.heidrick.com/.
29.
HambrickDonald C. (1981), “Specialization of Environmental Scanning Activities Among Upper Level Executives,”Journal of Management Studies, 18(3), 299–320.
30.
HambrickDonald C., and MasonPhyllis A. (1984), “Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers,”Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
31.
HoggMichael A. (2016), “Social Identity Theory,” in Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory, McKeownS., HajiR., and FergusonN., eds. Basel, CH: Springer, 3–19.
JacksonSusan E. (1992), “Consequences of Group Composition for the Interpersonal Dynamics of Strategic Issue Processing,” in Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 8, DuttonJ., HuffA., and ShrivastavaP., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 345–82.
34.
KaltonGraham, and AndersonDallas W. (1986), “Sampling Rare Populations,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 149(1), 65–82.
35.
KatsikeasConstantine S., MorganNeil A., LeonidouLeonidas L., and TomasG., HultM. (2016), “Assessing Performance Outcomes in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 1–20.
36.
KeininghamTimothy L., CooilBruce, AndreassenTor Wallin, and AksoyLerzan (2007), “A Longitudinal Examination of Net Promoter and Firm Revenue Growth,”Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 39–51.
37.
KohliAjay K, and JaworskiBernard J. (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,”Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.
38.
KorYasemin Y., and SundaramurthyChamu (2009), “Experience-Based Human Capital and Social Capital of Outside Directors,”Journal of Management, 35(4), 981–1006.
KrauseRyan (2017), “Being the CEO's Boss: An Examination of Board Chair Orientations,”Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 697–713.
41.
KrauseRyan, SemadeniMatthew, and CannellaAlbert A.Jr., (2013), “External COO/Presidents as Expert Directors: A New Look at the Service Role of Boards,”Strategic Management Journal, 34(13), 1628–41.
42.
KrauseRyan, SemadeniMatthew, and CannellaAlbert A.Jr., (2014), “CEO Duality: A Review and Research Agenda,”Journal of Management, 40(1), 256–86.
43.
LarckerDavid F., and RusticusTyomme O. (2010), “On the Use of Instrumental Variables in Accounting Research,”Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 186–205.
44.
LeeEucman, and PuranamPhanish (2016), “The Implementation Imperative: Why One Should Implement Even Imperfect Strategies Perfectly,”Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1529–46.
45.
LorschJay W., and ZellekeAndy (2005), “Should the CEO Be the Chairman?”MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 70–74.
46.
MalsheAshwin, and AgarwalManoj K. (2015), “From Finance to Marketing: The Impact of Financial Leverage on Customer Satisfaction,”Journal of Marketing, 79(5), 21–38.
47.
McAlisterLeigh, SrinivasanRaji, JindalNiket, and CannellaAlbert A. (2016), “Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Effect of Firm Strategy,”Journal of Marketing Research, 53(2), 207–24.
48.
McDonaldMichael L., and WestphalJames D. (2013), “Access Denied: Low Mentoring of Women and Minority First-Time Directors and Its Negative Effects on Appointments to Additional Boards,”Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1169–98.
49.
McDonaldMichael L., WestphalJames D., and GraebnerMelissa E. (2008), “What Do They Know? The Effects of Outside Director Acquisition Experience on Firm Acquisition Performance,”Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1155–77.
50.
McNultyTerry, and PettigrewAndrew (1999), “Strategists on the Board,”Organization Studies, 20(1), 47–74.
51.
MizikNatalie, and JacobsonRobert (2003), “Trading Off Between Value Creation and Value Appropriation: The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis,”Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 63–76.
52.
MizruchiMark S. (1996), “What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates,”Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–98.
53.
MoormanChristine, and RustRoland T. (1999), “The Role of Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 180–97.
54.
MorganNeil A., SlotegraafRebecca J., and VorhiesDouglas W. (2009), “Linking Marketing Capabilities with Profit Growth,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 284–93.
55.
MullinBarbara A., and HoggMichael A. (1999), “Motivations for Group Membership: The Role of Subjective Importance and Uncertainty Reduction,”Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 91–102.
56.
NathPravin, and MahajanVijay (2008), “Chief Marketing Officers: A Study of Their Presence in Firms’ Top Management Teams,”Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 65–81.
57.
National Association of Corporate Directors (2011), Public Company Governance Survey.Washington, DC: National Association of Corporate Directors.
58.
PettigrewThomas F., and TroppLinda R. (2008), “How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Mediators,”European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–34.
59.
QuigleyTimothy J., and HambrickDonald C. (2012), “When the Former CEO Stays on as Board Chair: Effects on Successor Discretion, Strategic Change, and Performance,”Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 834–59.
60.
SemadeniMatthew, WithersMichael C., and Trevis CertoS. (2014), “The Perils of Endogeneity and Instrumental Variables in Strategy Research: Understanding through Simulations,”Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 1070–79.
61.
SirmonDavid G., HittMichael A., and Duane IrelandR. (2007), “Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box,”Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–92.
62.
SlaterStanley F., and NarverJohn C. (1994), “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation–Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 46–55.
63.
Spencer Stuart (2010), Spencer Stuart Board Index.Chicago: Spencer Stuart.
64.
Spencer Stuart (2016), Spencer Stuart Board Index.Chicago: Spencer Stuart.
65.
SrinivasanRaji, LilienGary L., and SridharShrihari (2011), “Should Firms Spend More on Research and Development and Advertising during Recessions?”Journal of Marketing, 75(5), 49–65.
66.
SrinivasanRaji, WuytsStefan, and MallapragadaGirish (2018), “Corporate Board Interlocks and New Product Introductions,”Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 132–48.
67.
StockJames H., WrightJonathan H., and YogoMotohiro (2002), “A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments,”Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(4), 518–29.
68.
Ter BraakAnne, DekimpeMarnik G., and GeyskensInge (2013), “Retailer Private-Label Margins: The Role of Supplier and Quality-Tier Differentiation,”Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 86–103.
69.
TuliKapil R., BharadwajSundar G., and KohliAjay K. (2010), “Ties that Bind: The Impact of Multiple Types of Ties with a Customer on Sales Growth and Sales Volatility,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(1), 36–50.
70.
VandenbrouckeElien, KnockaertMirjam, and UcbasaranDeniz (2016), “Outside Board Human Capital and Early Stage High-Tech Firm Performance,”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 759–79.
71.
VerhoefPeter C., and LeeflangPeter S. H. (2009), “Understanding the Marketing Department's Influence Within the Firm,”Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 14–37.
72.
WebsterFrederick E.Jr., MalterAlan J., and GanesanShankar (2005), “The Decline and Dispersion of Marketing Competence,”MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(4), 35–43.
73.
WestphalJames D., and MiltonLaurie P. (2000), “How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Boards,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 366–98.
74.
WestphalJames D., SeidelMarc-David L., and StewartKatherine J. (2001), “Second-Order Imitation: Uncovering Latent Effects of Board Network Ties,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 717–47.
75.
WestphalJames D., and ZajacEdward J. (1995), “Who Shall Govern? CEO/Board Power, Demographic Similarity, and New Director Selection,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 60–83.
76.
WestphalJames D., and ZajacEdward J. (2013), “A Behavioral Theory of Corporate Governance: Explicating the Mechanisms of Socially Situated and Socially Constituted Agency,”Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 607–61.
77.
WhitlerKimberly A. (2016), “Why Few Marketers Are Invited to Join Boards of Directors,”Forbes (January 19), http://ow.ly/Xi8Yc.
78.
WhitlerKimberly A., and MorganNeil (2017), “Why CMOs Never Last and What to Do About It,”Harvard Business Review, 95(July/August), 45–54.
79.
WithersMichael C., HillmanAmy J., and CannellaAlbert A. (2012), “A Multidisciplinary Review of the Director Selection Literature,”Journal of Management, 38(1), 243–77.
80.
WooldridgeJeffrey M. (2010), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81.
XiongGuiyang, and BharadwajSundar (2013), “Asymmetric Roles of Advertising and Marketing Capability in Financial Returns to News: Turning Bad into Good and Good into Great,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50(6), 706–24.
82.
ZhuDavid H., and WestphalJames D. (2014), “How Directors’ Prior Experience with Other Demographically Similar CEOs Affects Their Appointments onto Corporate Boards and the Consequences for CEO Compensation,”Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 791–813.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
