As franchise systems expand, the clustering and resulting proximity of same-brand outlets often become contentious issues. The increased interactions among outlets may facilitate knowledge sharing, even while inducing intrabrand competition. Prior research has considered each possibility—knowledge sharing or intrabrand competition—in isolation, resulting in conflicting recommendations to the central question of whether multiple same-brand outlets should be close to or distant from one another. In this study, the authors take the perspective of the focal outlet and show that the opportunity to share knowledge afforded by clustering-based proximity may or may not be realized, depending on the motivation and ability of the proximal outlets to share knowledge, the focal outlet's ability to absorb knowledge, and the governance context. An analysis of more than 8,000 observations on the 988 outlets of a U.S.-based automotive service franchise system from 1977 to 2012, and corresponding outlet-level sales information from 2004 to 2012, provides support for the authors’ hypotheses.
ArgoteLinda, and DarrEric (2000), “Repositories of Knowledge in Franchise Organizations: Individual, Structural, and Technological,”Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities, 82 (1), 51–65.
4.
ArgoteLinda, McEvilyBill, and ReagansRay (2003), “Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes,”Management Science, 49 (4), 571–82.
5.
ArgoteLinda, and Miron-SpektorElla (2011), “Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge,”Organization Science, 22 (5), 1123–37.
6.
ArgyrisChris, and SchönDonald A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
BaumJoel A.C., and IngramPaul (1998), “Survival-Enhancing Learning in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898–1980,”Management Science, 44 (7), 996–1016.
8.
BellSimon J., TraceyPaul, and HeideJan B. (2009), “The Organization of Regional Clusters,”Academy of Management Review, 34 (4), 623–42.
9.
BhattacharyaChitrabhan B., and SenSankar (2003), “Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies,”Journal of Marketing, 67 (2), 76–88.
10.
BradachJeffrey L. (1997), “Using the Plural Form in the Management of Restaurant Chains,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 276–303.
11.
BrickleyJames A., and DarkFrederick H. (1987), “The Choice of Organizational Form: The Case of Franchising,”Journal of Financial Economics, 18 (2), 401–20.
12.
BrickleyJames A., DarkFrederick H., and WeisbachMichael S. (1991), “An Agency Perspective on Franchising,”Financial Management, 20 (1), 27–35.
13.
ChenYu-Shan, LinMing-Ji James, and ChangChing-Hsun (2009), “The Positive Effects of Relationship Learning and Absorptive Capacity on Innovation Performance and Competitive Advantage in Industrial Markets,”Industrial Marketing Management, 38 (2), 152–58.
14.
ChungWilbur, and KalninsArturs (2001), “Agglomeration Effects and Performance: A Test of the Texas Lodging Industry,”Strategic Management Journal, 22 (10), 969–88.
15.
CohenWesley M., and LevinthalDaniel A. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–52.
16.
CummingsJonathon N. (2004), “Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization,”Management Science, 50 (3), 352–64.
17.
CyertRichard M., and MarchJames G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
DarrEric D., ArgoteLinda, and EppleDennis (1995), “The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises,”Management Science, 41 (11), 1750–62.
19.
DarrEric D., and KurtzbergTerri R. (2000), “An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82 (1), 28–44.
20.
DavisPeter (2006), “Spatial Competition in Retail Markets: Movie Theaters,”RAND Journal of Economics, 37 (4), 964–82.
21.
De LucaLuigi M., and Atuahene-GimaKwaku (2007), “Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 71 (January), 95–112.
22.
GanesanShankar, MalterAlan J., and RindfleischAric (2005), “Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (October), 44–60.
23.
HansenMorten T., MorsMarie Louise, and LøvåsBjørn (2005), “Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: Multiple Networks, Multiple Phases,”Academy of Management Journal, 48 (5), 776–93.
24.
HeckmanJames J. (1976), “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection, and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models,”Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5 (4), 475–92.
25.
HoHillbun, and GanesanShankar (2013), “Does Knowledge Base Compatibility Help or Hurt Knowledge Sharing Between Suppliers in Coopetition? The Role of Customer Participation,”Journal of Marketing, 77 (6), 91–107.
26.
HuberGeorge P. (1991), “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures,”Organization Science, 2 (1), 88–115.
27.
IngramPaul, and BaumJoel A.C. (1997), “Chain Affiliation and the Failure of Manhattan Hotels, 1898–1980,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), 68–102.
28.
IngramPaul, and BaumJoel A.C. (2001), “Interorganizational Learning and the Dynamics of Chain Relationships,” in Multiunit Organization and Multimarket Strategy, Vol. 18, BaumJoel A.C. and GreveHenrich R., eds. Kidlington, UK: Elsevier Science, 109–39.
KalninsArturs (2003), “Hamburger Prices and Spatial Econometrics,”Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12 (4), 591–616.
31.
KalninsArturs (2004), “An Empirical Analysis of Territorial Encroachment Within Franchised and Company-Owned Branded Chains,”Marketing Science, 23 (4), 476–89.
32.
KalninsArturs, and LafontaineFrancine (2004), “Multi-Unit Ownership in Franchising: Evidence from the Fast-Food Industry in Texas,”RAND Journal of Economics, 35 (4), 747–61.
33.
KalninsArturs, and MayerKyle J. (2004), “Franchising, Ownership, and Experience: A Study of Pizza Restaurant Survival,”Management Science, 50 (1), 1716–28.
34.
KashyapVishal, AntiaKersi D., and FrazierGary L. (2012), “Contracts, Extracontractual Incentives, and Ex Post Behavior in Franchise Channel Relationships,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (2), 260–76.
35.
LafontaineFrancine (1992), “Agency Theory and Franchising: Some Empirical Results,”RAND Journal of Economics, 23 (2), 263–83.
36.
LarsonAndrea (1992), “Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76–104.
37.
LuSusan F., and WedigGerard J. (2013), “Clustering, Agency Costs, and Operating Efficiency: Evidence from Nursing Home Chains,”Management Science, 59 (3), 677–94.
38.
MacInnisDeborah J., MoormanChristine, and JaworskiBernard J. (1991), “Enhancing and Measuring Consumers’ Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from Ads,”Journal of Marketing, 55 (October), 32–53.
39.
MinerAnne S., and HaunschildPamela R. (1995), “Population-Level Learning,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 17, StawB. and CummingsL., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 115–66.
40.
MittalVikas, KamakuraWagner A., and GovindRahul (2004), “Geographic Patterns in Customer Service and Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (3), 48–62.
41.
NadlerJanice, ThompsonLeigh, and Van BovenLeaf (2003), “Learning Negotiation Skills: Four Models of Knowledge Creation and Transfer,”Management Science, 49 (4), 529–40.
PancrasJoseph, SriramSrinivasaraghavan, and KumarV. (2012), “Empirical Investigation of Retail Expansion and Cannibalization in a Dynamic Environment,”Management Science, 58 (11), 2001–18.
44.
PenroseEdith (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45.
PerrymanAlexa A., and CombsJames G. (2012), “Who Should Own It? An Agency‐Based Explanation for Multi‐Outlet Ownership and Co‐Location in Plural Form Franchising,”Strategic Management Journal, 33 (4), 368–86.
46.
PorterMichael E. (1998), Clusters and Competition: New Agendas for Companies, Governments, and Institutions.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
47.
ShaneScott A. (2001), “Organizational Incentives and Organizational Mortality,”Organization Science, 12 (2), 136–60.
48.
SinkulaJames M. (1994), “Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (January), 35–45.
49.
SlaterStanley F., and NarverJohn C. (1995), “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (July), 63–74.
50.
SwaminathanVanitha, and MoormanChristine (2009), “Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 52–69.
51.
TraceyPaul, HeideJan B., and BellSimon J. (2014), “Bringing ‘Place’ Back In: Regional Clusters, Project Governance, and New Product Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing, 78 (6), 1–16.
52.
TsaiWenpin (2002), “Social Structure of ‘Coopetition’ Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing,”Organization Science, 13 (2), 179–90.
53.
TsaiWenpin, and GhoshalSumantra (1998), “Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks,”Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4), 464–76.
54.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1996), The Mechanisms of Governance.New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
ZahraShaker A., and GeorgeGerard (2002), “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension,”Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), 185–203.
56.
ZanderUdo, and KogutBruce (1995), “Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test,”Organization Science, 6 (1), 76–92.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
