The authors address the questions of whether and how corporate social responsibility (CSR) relates to firm performance and, in so doing, identify four mechanisms pertaining to this relationship: (1) slack resources lead to CSR (i.e., slack resources mechanism) (2) CSR improves performance (i.e., good management mechanism), (3) CSR makes amends for past corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) (i.e., penance mechanism), and (4) CSR insures against subsequent CSI (i.e., insurance mechanism). Using an integrative approach, the authors incorporate the four mechanisms in their empirical model specification. Specifically, to model the interplay among CSR, CSI, and firm performance and to test the four mechanisms simultaneously, they propose a structural panel vector autoregression specification. In support of the good management mechanism, results from an unbalanced panel data set of more than 4,500 firms and up to 19 years suggest that firms that engage in CSR are likely to benefit financially from their CSR investments. Moreover, the authors do not find support for the slack resources or the insurance mechanism. In contrast, and in support of the penance mechanism, often firms' CSR seems to trail their CSI. However, the results also suggest that the penance mechanism is ineffective in offsetting negative performance effects due to CSI.
ManuelArellano and BondStephen (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,”Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), 277–97.
2.
AupperleKenneth E., CarrollArchie B., and HatfieldJohn D. (1985), “An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability,”Academy of Management Journal, 28 (2), 446–63.
3.
BarnettMichael L. and SalomonRobert M. (2012), “Does It Pay to Be Really Good? Addressing the Shape of the Relationship between Social and Financial Performance,”Strategic Management Journal, 33 (11), 1304–20.
4.
BeckerGary S. (2007), Economic Theory.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
5.
BhattacharyaC.B. and SenSankar (2004), “Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives,”California Management Review, 47 (1), 9–24.
6.
BlundellRichard and BondStephen (1998), “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models,”Journal of Econometrics, 87 (1), 115–43.
7.
BrooksMargaret E., HighhouseScott, RussellSteven S., and MohrDavid C. (2003), “Familiarity, Ambivalence, and Organization Reputation: Is Corporate Fame a Double-Edged Sword?”Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 904–14.
8.
CaoBolong and SunYixiao (2011), “Asymptotic Distributions of Impulse Response Functions in Short Panel Vector Autore-gressions,”Journal of Econometrics, 163 (2), 127–43.
9.
ChenYubo, GanesanShankar, and LiuYong (2009), “Does a Firm's Product-Recall Strategy Affect Its Financial Value? An Examination of Strategic Alternatives during Product-Harm Crises,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (November), 214–26.
10.
ChinM. K., HambrickDonald C., and TreviñoLinda K. (2013), “Political Ideologies of CEOs: The Influence of Executives' Values on Corporate Social Responsibility,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 197–232.
11.
ChoiIn (2001), “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data,”Journal of International Money and Finance, 20 (2), 249–72.
12.
CholletPierre and CellierAlexis (2011), “The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Rating Announcements on European Stock Prices,”International Conference of the French Finance Association (AFFI), May 11–13.
13.
ChungKee H. and PruittStephen W. (1994), “A Simple Approximation of Tobin's q,”Financial Management, 23 (3), 70–74.
14.
CooleyThomas F. and DwyerMark (1998), “Business Cycle Analysis Without Much Theory: A Look at Structural VARs,”Journal of Econometrics, 83 (1-2), 57–88.
15.
CoxPaul, BrammerStephen, and MillingtonAndrew (2004), “An Empirical Examination of Institutional Investor Preferences for Corporate Social Performance,”Journal of Business Ethics, 52 (1), 27–43.
16.
DekimpeMarnik G. and HanssensDominique M. (1999), “Sustained Spending and Persistent Response: A New Look at Long-Term Marketing Profitability,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (November), 397–412.
17.
DemiralpSelva and HooverKevin D. (2003), “Searching for Causal Structure in Vector Autoregression,”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65, 745–67.
18.
DickeyDavid A. and FullerWayne A. (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74 (366), 427–31.
19.
DoanThomas A. (1992), RATS User's Manual, Version 4. Evanston, IL: Estima.
20.
DoornikJurgen A., ArellanoManuel, and BondStephen (2006), “Panel Data Estimation using DPD for Ox,” mimeo.
21.
EndersWalter (2004), Applied Econometric Time Series. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley&Sons.
22.
FlammerCaroline (2013), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Reaction: The Environmental Awareness of Investors,”Academy of Management Journal, 56 (3), 758–81.
23.
FombrunCharles J. (1996), Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
24.
FransesPhilip Hans (2005), “On the Use of Econometric Models for Policy Simulation in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (February), 4–14.
25.
GermannFrank, EbbesPeter, and GrewalRajdeep (2015), “The Chief Marketing Officer Matters!”Journal of Marketing, 79 (May), 1–22.
26.
RajdeepGrewal, RossWilliam T.Jr., and SrivastavaRajendra K. (2014), “Product Recalls and the Moderating Role of Brand Commitment,”Marketing Letters, 25 (2), 179–91.
27.
GodfreyPaul C, MerrillCraig B., and HansenJared M. (2009), “The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis,”Strategic Management Journal, 30 (4), 425–45.
28.
GrangerClive W.J. and NewboldPaul (1974), “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics,”Journal of Econometrics, 2 (2), 111–20.
29.
GreeningDaniel W. and TurbanDaniel B. (2000), “Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce,”Business&Society, 39 (3), 254–80.
30.
GroeningChristopher, SwaminathanVanitha, and MittalVikas (2015), “A Contingency Framework of Firm's Corporate Social Responsibility Profile and Firm Value,” working paper, Kent State University.
31.
HansenLars Peter (1982), “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators,”Econometrica, 50 (4), 1029–54.
32.
HanssensDominique M. and OuyangMing (2001), “Hysteresis in Market Response: WhenIsMarketing Spending anInvestment?” working paper, University of Texas at Dallas.
33.
HartStuart L. and AhujaGautam (1996), “Does It Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance,”Business Strategy and the Environment, 5 (1), 30–37.
HealGeoffrey (2005), “Corporate Social Responsibility: An Economic and Financial Framework,”Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance. Issues and Practice, 30 (3), 387–409.
36.
HillmanAmy J. and KeimGerald D. (2001), “Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What's the Bottom Line?”Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2), 125–39.
37.
Holtz-EakinDouglas, NeweyWhitney, and RosenHarvey S. (1988), “Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data,”Econometrica, 56 (6), 1371–95.
38.
HuangBwo-Nung, HwangM.J., and YangC.W. (2008), “Causal Relationship Between Energy Consumption and GDP Growth Revisited: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach,”Ecological Economics, 67 (1), 41–54.
39.
HullClyde Eiríkur and RothenbergSandra (2008), “Firm Performance: the Interactions of Corporate Social Performance with Innovation and Industry Differentiation,”Strategic Management Journal, 29 (7), 781–89.
40.
ImKyung So, PesaranM. Hashem, and ShinYongcheol (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels,”Journal of Econometrics, 115 (1), 53–74.
IyengarRaghuram, Van den BulteChristophe, and LeeJae Young (2015), “Social Contagion in New Product Trial and Repeat,”Marketing Science, 34 (3), 408–29.
43.
SatishJayachandran, KalaignanamKartik, and EilertA. Meike (2013), “Product and Environmental Social Performance: Varying Effect on Firm performance,”Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1255–64.
44.
JensenMichael C. (2002), “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function,”Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (2), 235–56.
45.
JonesGary H., JonesBeth H., and LittlePhilip (2000), “Reputation as Reservoir: Buffering Against Loss in Times of Economic Crisis,”Corporate Reputation Review, 3 (1), 21–29.
46.
KamienM. and SchwartzN. (1991), Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variation and Optimal Control in Economics and Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
47.
KingAndrew and LenoxMichael J. (2001), “Does It Really Pay to be Green? Accounting for Strategy Selection in the Relationship Between Environmental and Financial Performance,”Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5 (1), 105–16.
48.
KleinJill and DawarNiraj (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers' Attributions and Brand Evaluations in a Product-Harm Crisis,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (3), 203–17.
49.
KotchenMatthew J., and MoonJon Jungbien (2012), “Corporate Social Responsibility for Irresponsibility,”The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis&Policy, 12(1), [DOI: 10.1515/1935-1682.3308].
50.
KrepsD.M. (1990), A Course in Microeconomic Theory.Princeton: NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
LeeRuby P. and GrewalRajdeep (2004), “Strategic Responses to New Technologies and Their Impact on Firm Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (October), 157–71.
52.
LoveInessa and ZicchinoLea (2006), “Financial Development and Dynamic Investment Behavior: Evidence from Panel VAR,”Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46 (2), 190–210.
53.
LucasRobert E. (1976), “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique,”Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1 (1), 19–46.
54.
LuoXueming, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (October), 1–18.
55.
and (2009), “The Debate over Doing Good: Cor porate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (November), 198–213.
56.
MackeyAlison, MackeyTyson B., and BarneyJay B. (2007), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Investor Preferences and Corporate Strategies,”Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 817–35.
57.
MargolisJoshua, ElfenbeinHillary, and WalshJames (2007), “Does It Pay to Be Good? A Meta-Analysis and Redirection of Research on the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance,” working paper, Harvard University.
58.
and WalshJames (2001), People and Profits: The Search for A Link Between A Company's Social and Financial Performance.New York: Psychology Press.
59.
McGuireJean B., SundgrenAlison, and SchneeweisThomas (1988), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance,”Academy of Management Journal, 31 (4), 854–72.
60.
McWilliamsAbagail and SiegelDonald (1997), “Event Studies in Management Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues,”Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3), 626–57.
61.
and (2000), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?”Strategic Management Journal, 21 (5), 603–09.
62.
and (2001), “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective,”Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 117–27.
63.
and WrightPatrick M. (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications,”Journal of Management Studies, 43 (1), 1–18.
64.
MillerDouglas J. (2004), “Firms' Technological Resources and the Performance Effects of Diversification: A Longitudinal Study,”Strategic Management Journal, 25 (11), 1097–119.
65.
MinorDylan (2011), “Corporate Citizenship as Insurance: Theory and Evidence,” working paper, University of California, Berkeley.
66.
and MorganJohn (2011), “CSR as Reputation Insurance: PRIMUM NON NOCERE,”California Management Review, 53 (3), 40–59.
67.
MullerAlan and KräusslRoman (2011), “Doing Good Deeds in Times of Need: A Strategic Perspective on Corporate Disaster Donations,”Strategic Management Journal, 32 (9), 911–29.
68.
NaikPrasad A. and RamanKalyan (2003), “Understanding the Impact of Synergy in Multimedia Communications,”Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (November), 375–88.
69.
and WinerRussell S. (2005), “Planning Marketing-Mix Strategies in the Presence of Interaction Effects,”Marketing Science, 24 (1), 25–34.
70.
OrlitzkyMarc, SchmidtFrank L., and RynesSara L. (2003), “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis,”Organization Studies, 24 (3), 403–41.
71.
PauwelsKoen (2004), “How Dynamic Consumer Response, Competitor Response, Company Support, and Company Inertia Shape Long-Term Marketing Effectiveness,”Marketing Science, 23 (4), 596–610.
72.
PesaranH. Hashem and ShinYongcheol (1998), “Generalized Impulse Response Analysis in Linear Multivariate Models,”Economics Letters, 58 (1), 17–29.
73.
PrestonLee E. and O'BannonDouglas P. (1997), “The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship,”Business&Society, 36 (4), 419–29.
SchnietzKaren E. and EpsteinMarc J. (2005), “Exploring the Financial Value of a Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility During a Crisis,”Corporate Reputation Review, 7 (4), 327–45.
77.
ScholtensBert (2008), “A Note on the Interaction Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance,”Ecological Economics, 68 (1-2), 46–55.
78.
ServaesHenri and TamayoAne (2013), “The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness,”Management Science, 59 (5), 1045–61.
79.
SethiSuresh P. and ThompsonGerald L. (2006), Optimal Control Theory: Applications to Management Science and Economics. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
80.
SethuramanRaj, TellisGerard J., and BrieschRichard (2011), “How Well Does Advertising Work? Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis of Brand Advertising Elasticity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (June), 457–71.
81.
SorescuAlina B. and SpanjolJelena (2008), “Innovation's Effect on Firm Value and Risk: Insights from Consumer Packaged Goods,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (March), 114–32.
82.
SridharShrihari, MantralaMurali K., NaikPrasad A., and ThorsonEsther (2011), “Dynamic Marketing Budgeting for Platform Firms: Theory, Evidence, and Application,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (November), 929–43.
83.
NarayananSriram, and SrinivasanRaji (2014), “Dynamic Relationships Among R&D, Advertising, Inventory and Firm Performance,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42 (3), 277–90.
84.
UhligHarald (2005), “What Are the Effects of Monetary Policy on Output? Results from an Agnostic Identification Procedure,”Journal of Monetary Economics, 52 (2), 381–419.
85.
Van HeerdeHarald J., DekimpeMarnik, and PutsisWilliam P.Jr. (2005), “Marketing Models and the Lucas Critique,”Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (February), 15–21.
86.
WaddockSandra A. and GravesSamuel B. (1997), “The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link,”Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4), 303–19.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
