Competing suppliers that collaborate to serve downstream original equipment manufacturer customers often encounter partners with overlapping and compatible knowledge bases. Such knowledge base compatibility provides supplier partners the opportunity to exchange knowledge efficiently, leading to greater knowledge sharing. However, the ease of misappropriation of the shared knowledge can offset this beneficial effect. This research proposes that the effect of knowledge base compatibility on supplier partners' knowledge sharing is moderated by the customer's participation in the collaborative effort and by the customer value such effort creates. The results of two empirical studies show that when levels of both customer participation and customer value are high, knowledge base compatibility between supplier partners leads to greater knowledge sharing. In contrast, when customer participation is high but customer value is low, knowledge base compatibility leads to lower levels of supplier knowledge sharing. This investigation validates the importance of key factors related to supplier partners' opportunity and motivation to share knowledge in coopetitive partnerships.
AikenLeona S., and WestStephen G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2.
ArmstrongScott, Terry, and OvertonS. (1977), “Estimating Non-response Bias in Mail Surveys,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (August), 396–402.
3.
BascleGuilhem (2008), “Controlling for Endogeneity with Instrumental Variables in Strategic Management Research, Strategic Organization, 6 (3), 285–327.
4.
CannonJoseph P., and PerreaultWilliam D.Jr. (1999), “Buyer–Seller Relationships in Business Markets,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (November), 439–60.
5.
CapronLaurence, and HullandJohn (1999), “Redeployment of Brands, Sales Forces, and General Marketing Management Expertise Following Horizontal Acquisitions: A Resource-Based View,”Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 41–54.
6.
CheungMee-Shew, MyersMatthew B., and MentzerJohn T. (2011), “The Value of Relational Learning in Global Buyer–Supplier Exchanges: A Dyadic Perspective and Test of the Pie-Sharing Premise,”Strategic Management Journal, 32 (10), 1061–82
CohenWesley M., and LevinthalDaniel A. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–52.
9.
DasT.K., and TengBing-Sheng (1998), “Developing Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances,”Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 491–512.
10.
DhanarajCharles, and ParkheArvind (2006), “Orchestrating Innovation Networks,”Academy of Management Review, 31 (3), 659–69.
11.
DyerJeffrey H., and HatchNile W. (2007), “Relation-Specific Capabilities and Barriers to Knowledge Transfers: Creating Advantage Through Network Relationships,”Strategic Management Journal, 27 (8), 701–719.
12.
DyerJeffrey H., and NobeokaKentaro (2000), “Creating and Managing a High-Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case,”Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 345–67.
13.
DyerJeffrey H., and SinghHarbir (1998), “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage,”Academy of Management Review, 23 (4), 660–79.
14.
FrazierGary L., MaltzElliot, AntiaKersi D., and RindfleischAric (2009), “Distributor Strategic Information Sharing with Suppliers,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (July), 31–43.
15.
GanesanShankar (1994), “Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer–Seller Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (April), 1–19.
16.
GanesanShankar, BrownSteven P., MariadossBabu John, and HoHillbun (Dixon) (2010), “Buffering and Amplifying Effects of Relationship Commitment in Business-to-Business Relationships,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (April), 361–73.
17.
GanesanShankar, MalterAlan, and RindfleischAric (2005), “Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (October), 44–60.
18.
GrantRobert M. (1996), “Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration,”Organization Science, 7 (4), 375–87.
19.
GulatiRanjay, and SinghHarbir (1998), “The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (4), 781–834.
20.
HaasMartine R., and HansenMorten T. (2007), “Different Knowledge, Different Benefits: Toward a Productivity Perspective on Knowledge Sharing in Organizations,”Strategic Management Journal, 28 (11), 1133–53.
21.
HamelGary (1991), “Competition for Competence and Interpartner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances,”Strategic Management Journal, 12 (S1), 83–103.
22.
HansenMorten T. (1999), “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1), 82–111.
23.
HansenMorten T., MorsMarie Louise, and LøvåsBjørn“Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: Multiple Networks, Multiple Phases,”Academy of Management Journal, 48 (5), 776–93.
24.
HeideJan B., WathneKenneth H., and RokkanAsksel I. (2007), “Interfirm Monitoring, Social Contracts, and Relationship Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (August), 425–33.
25.
HeimanBruce A., and NickersonJack A. (2004), “Empirical Evidence Regarding the Tension Between Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Expropriation in Collaborations,”Managerial and Decision Economics, 25 (6), 401–420.
26.
HuberGeorge P., and LewisKyle (2010), “Cross-Understanding: Implications for Group Cognition and Performance,”Academy of Management Review, 35 (1), 6–26.
27.
InkpenAndrew C. (2000), “Learning Through Joint Ventures: A Framework of Knowledge Acquisitions,”Journal of Management Studies, 37 (7), 1019–43.
28.
InkpenAndrew C. (2005), “Learning Through Alliances: General Motors and NUMMI,”California Management Review, 47 (4), 114–36.
29.
InkpenAndrew C., and TsangEric W.K. (2005), “Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer,”Academy of Management Review, 30 (1), 146–65.
30.
KalePrashant, DyerJeffrey H., and SinghHarbir (2002), “Alliance Capability, Stock Market Response, and Long-Term Alliance Success: The Role of the Alliance Function,”Strategic Management Journal, 23 (8), 747–67.
31.
KalePrashant, SinghHarbir, and PerlmutterHoward (2000), “Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital,”Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 217–37.
32.
KangMin-Ping, MahoneyJoseph T., and TanDanchi (2009), “Why Firms Make Unilateral Investments Specific to Other Firms: The Case of OEM Suppliers,”Strategic Management Journal, 30 (2), 117–35.
33.
KhannaTarun, GulatiRanjay, and NohriaNitin (1998), “The Dynamics of Learning Alliances: Competition, Cooperation, and Relative Scope,”Strategic Management Journal, 19 (3), 193–210.
34.
KotabeMasaaki, MartinXavier, and DomotoHiroshi (2003), “Gaining from Vertical Partnerships: Knowledge Transfer, Relationship Duration, and Supplier Performance Improvement in the U.S. and Japanese Automotive Industries,”Strategic Management Journal, 24 (4), 293–326.
35.
LanePeter J., KokaBalaji R., and PathakSeemantini (2006), “The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct,”Academy of Management Review, 31 (4), 833–63.
36.
LanePeter J., and LubatkinMichael (1998), “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning,”Strategic Management Journal, 19 (5), 461–77.
37.
LanePeter J., SalkJane E., and LylesMarjorie A. (2001), “Absorptive Capacity, Learning, and Performance in International Joint Ventures,”Strategic Management Journal, 22 (12), 1139–61.
38.
LavieDovev (2006), “The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View,”Academy of Management Review, 31 (3), 638–58.
39.
LiDan, EdenLorraine, HittMichael A., and Duane IrelandR. (2008), “Friends, Acquaintances, or Strangers? Partner Selection in R&D Alliances,”Academy of Management Journal, 51 (2), 315–34.
40.
LikerJeffrey K., and ChoiThomas Y. (2004), “Building Deep Supplier Relationships,”Harvard Business Review, 82 (December), 104–113.
41.
MadhokAnoop, Stephen, and TallmanB. (1998), “Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships,”Organization Science, 9 (3), 326–39.
42.
MakhijaMona V., and GaneshUsha (1997), “The Relationship Between Control and Partner Learning in Learning-Related Joint Ventures,”Organization Science, 8 (5), 508–527.
43.
MesquitaLuiz F., AnandJaideep, Thomas, and BrushH. (2008), “Comparing the Resource-Based and Relational Views: Knowledge Transfer and Spillover in Vertical Alliances,”Strategic Management Journal, 29 (9), 913–41.
44.
MoweryDavid C., OxleyJoanne E., and SilvermanBrian S. (1996), “Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer,”Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Special Issue), 77–91.
45.
NahapietJanine, and GhoshalSumantra (1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,”Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 242–66.
46.
NoordhoffCorine, KyriakopoulosKyriakos, MoormanChristine, PauwelsPieter, Benedict, and DellaertG.C. (2011), “The Bright Side and Dark Side of Embedded Ties in Business-to-Business Innovation,”Journal of Marketing, 75 (September), 34–52.
47.
OuchiWilliam G. (1979), “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms,”Management Science, 25 (9), 833–48.
48.
OxleyJoanne E., and SampsonRachelle C. (2004), “The Scope and Governance of International R&D Alliances,”Strategic Management Journal, 25 (Special Issue), 723–49.
49.
PalmatierRobert W., DantRajiv P., and GrewalDhruv (2007), “A Comparative Longitudinal Analysis of Theoretical Perspectives of Interorganizational Relationship Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 71 (October), 172–94.
50.
ParkheArvind (1993), “Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation,”Academy of Management Journal, 36 (4), 794–829.
51.
PhelpsCorey C. (2010), “A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation,”Academy of Management Journal, 53 (4), 890–913.
52.
QuigleyNarda R., TeslukPaul E., LockeEdwin A., and BartolKathryn M. (2007), “A Multilevel Investigation of the Motivational Mechanisms Underlying Knowledge Sharing and Performance,”Organization Science, 18 (1), 71–88.
53.
RindfleischAric, Jan, and HeideB. (1997), “Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications,”Journal of Marketing, 61 (October), 30–54.
54.
RindfleischAric, and MoormanChristine (2001), “The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective,”Journal of Marketing, 65 (April), 1–18.
55.
RindfleischAric, and MoormanChristine (2003), “Interfirm Cooperation and Customer Orientation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (November), 421–36.
56.
RossWilliam T.Jr., and RobertsonDiana C. (2007), “Compound Relationships Between Firms,”Journal of Marketing, 71 (July), 108–123.
57.
RowleyTim, BehrensDean, and KrackhardtDavid (2000), “Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries,”Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 369–86.
58.
SampsonRachelle C. (2004), “Organizational Choice in R&D Alliances: Knowledge-Based and Transaction Cost Perspectives,”Managerial and Decision Economics, 25 (6/7), 421–36.
59.
SrivastavaManish K., and GnyawaliDevi R. (2011), “When Do Relational Resources Matter? Leveraging Portfolio Technological Resources for Breakthrough Innovation,”Academy of Management Journal, 54 (4), 797–810.
60.
SzulanskiGabriel (1996), “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm,”Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1), 27–43.
61.
Van EerdeWendelien, and ThierryHenry (1996), “Vroom's Expectancy Models and Work-Related Criteria: A Meta-Analysis,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (5), 575–86.
62.
Van WijkRaymond, JansenJustin J.P., and LylesMarjorie A. (2008), “Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Consequences,”Journal of Management Studies, 45 (4), 830–53.
63.
WathneKenneth H., BiongHarald, Jan, and HeideB. (2001), “Choice of Supplier in Embedded Markets: Relationship and Marketing Program Effects,”Journal of Marketing, 65 (April), 54–66.
64.
WooldridgeJeffrey M. (2010), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2d ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65.
WuZhaohui, ChoiThomas Y., and Johnny RungtusanathamM. (2010), “Supplier–Supplier Relationships in Buyer–Supplier–Supplier Triads: Implications for Supplier Performance,”Journal of Operations Management, 28 (2), 115–23.
66.
WuytsStefan, StremerschStefan, Van den BulteChristophe, and FransesPhilip Hans (2004), “Vertical Marketing Systems for Complex Products: A Triadic Perspective,”Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (November), 479–87.
67.
ZachariaZach G., NixNancy W., and LuschRobert F. (2011), “Capabilities that Enhance Outcomes of an Episodic Supply Chain Collaboration,”Journal of Operations Management, 29 (6), 591–603.
68.
ZahraShaker A., and GeorgeGerard (2002), “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension,”Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), 185–203.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
