Innovations commonly involve changes to iterated market offerings (e.g., new games, car models, film sequels). To better understand consumer iteration responses, the authors develop and test a theoretical framework grounded in (1) prior innovations serving as reference states (comparators) for later innovations and (2) consumer desires for both comfort and stimulation. In Study 1's online game, prior innovations and loss aversion (greater loss than gain impact) moderate evaluations of current innovations, whereby an introduction-weaker-stronger innovation sequence (Periods 1–3 of four periods) generates more entertainment than an introduction-stronger-weaker sequence because the former's weak-opening-then-rise does less harm than the latter's strong-opening-then-drop. Study 2 replicates Study 1 and shows that an introduction-weaker-weaker sequence produces enough habituation and diminishing negative returns to outperform an introduction-stronger-weaker sequence at Period 4. Study 3 offers marketplace corroboration with a film industry test in which minor (fewer) innovations perform better (e.g., sales, return on investment) earlier in franchises, whereas major (many) innovations perform better later, thereby reconciling prior research's opposing prescriptions for the use of major versus minor sequel innovations. The framework and results implicate carefully sequenced innovations for managing consumer iteration responses, including the possibility of interspersing weaker/minor innovations among stronger/major innovations.
AakerJennifer L. (1997), “Dimensions of Brand Personality,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (August), 347–56.
2.
ArielyDan (1998), “Combining Experiences over Time: The Effects of Duration, Intensity Changes, and Online Measurement,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11 (1), 19–45.
3.
AxelrodRobert (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
4.
BassFrank M. (1969), “A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables,”Management Science, 15 (5), 215–27.
5.
BasuroySuman, ChatterjeeSubimal, and Abraham RavidS. (2003), “How Critical Are Critical Reviews? The Box Office Effects of Film Critics, Star Power, and Budgets,”Journal of Marketing, 67 (October), 103–17.
6.
BasuroySuman, DesaiKalpesh Kaushik, and TalukdarDebabrata (2006), “An Empirical Investigation of Signaling in the Motion Picture Industry,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (May), 287–95.
7.
BerlyneDaniel E. (1971), “Novelty and Attention: Controls for Retinal Adaptation and for Stimulus-Response Specificity,”Psychonomic Science, 25 (6), 349–51.
8.
BernoulliDaniel (1738, 1954), “Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk,”Louise Sommer, trans., Econometrica, 22 (1), 23–36.
9.
BhargaveRajesh and MontgomeryNicole Votolato (2013), “The Social Context of Temporal Sequences: Why First Impressions Shape Shared Experiences,”Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 501–16.
10.
BiehalGabriel and ChakravartiDipankar (1983), “Information Accessibility as a Moderator of Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (1), 1–14.
11.
BiswasDipayan, LabrecqueLauren, LehmannDonald, and MarkosEreni (2014), “Making Choices While Smelling, Tasting, and Listening: The Role of Sensory (Dis)similarity When Sequentially Sampling Products,”Journal of Marketing, 78 (January), 112–26.
12.
BrieschRichard A., KrishnamurthiLakshman, MazumdarTridib, and RajS.P. (1997), “A Comparative Analysis of Reference Price Models,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (2), 202–14.
13.
CareyJ. Ronald, ClicqueSteven H., LeightonBarbara A., and MiltonFrank (1976), “A Test of Positive Reinforcement of Customers,”Journal of Marketing, 40 (October), 98–100.
ChandrasekaranDeepa and TellisGerard J. (2007), “Diffusion of New Products: A Critical Review of Models, Drivers, and Findings,” in Review of Marketing Research, MalhotraNaresh K., ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, 39–80.
16.
DharTirtha, SunGuanghui, and WeinbergCharles B. (2012), “The Long-Term Box Performance of Sequel Movies,”Marketing Letters, 23 (1), 13–29.
EliashbergJehoshua and ShuganSteven M. (1997), “Film Critics: Influencers or Predictors?”Journal of Marketing, 61 (April), 68–78.
19.
Entertainment Software Association (2015), “2015 Sales, Usage, and Demographic Data—Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry,” (accessed September 14, 2015), [available at http://www.theesa.com/about-esa/industry-facts].
20.
FlahertyCharles F. (1996), Incentive Relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
FornellClaes (1992), “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience,”Journal of Marketing, 56 (January), 6–21.
22.
FournierSusan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 98 (4), 343–73.
23.
FournierSusan and AlvarezClaudio (2012), “Brands as Relationship Partners: Warmth, Competence, and In-Between,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (2), 177–85.
24.
FredricksonBarbara and KahnemanDaniel (1993), “Duration Neglect in Retrospective Evaluations of Affective Episodes,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (1), 45–55.
GoodeMiranda R., DahlDarren W., and Page MoreauC. (2013), “Innovation Aesthetics: The Relationship Between Category Cues, Categorization Certainty, and Newness Perceptions,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (2), 192–208.
27.
GornGerald J. (1982), “The Effects of Music in Advertising on Choice Behavior: A Classical Conditioning Approach,”Journal of Marketing, 46 (Winter), 94–101.
28.
GrahamLindsay T., GoslingSamuel D., and TravisChristopher K. (2015), “The Psychology of Home Environments: A Call for Research on Residential Space,”Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10 (2), 346–56.
29.
GuptaSunil and CooperLee G. (1992), “The Discounting of Discounts and Promotion Thresholds,”Journal of Consumer Research, 92 (3), 401–11.
30.
HaYoung-Won and HochStephen J. (1989), “Ambiguity, Processing Strategy, and Advertising-Evidence Interactions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (3), 354–60.
31.
HamermanEric J. and JoharGita V. (2013), “Conditioned Superstition: Desire for Control and Consumer Brand Preferences,”Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 428–43.
HasegawaShohei, TeruiNobuhiko, and AllenbyGreg M. (2012), “Dynamic Brand Satiation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (December), 842–53.
34.
Hennig-ThurauThorsten, HoustonMark B., and HeitjansTorsten (2009), “Conceptualizing and Measuring the Monetary Value of Brand Extensions: The Case of Motion Pictures,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (November), 167–83.
35.
HochStephen J. and HaYoung-Won (1986), “Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (2), 221–33.
36.
HolakSusan L., LehmannDonald R., and SultanFareena (1987), “The Role of Expectations in the Adoption of Innovative Consumer Durables: Some Preliminary Evidence,”Journal of Retailing, 63 (Fall), 243–59.
37.
HseeChristopher K. and AbelsonRobert P. (1991), “Velocity Relation: Satisfaction as a Function of the First Derivative of Outcome over Time,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (3), 341–47.
38.
HseeChristopher K., SaloveyPeter, and AbelsonRobert P. (1994), “The Quasi-Acceleration Relation: Satisfaction as a Function of the Change of Velocity of Outcome over Time,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30 (January), 96–111.
39.
KahnemanDaniel, KnetschJack L., and ThalerRichard H. (1990), “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem,”Journal of Political Economy, 98 (6), 1325–48.
40.
KahnemanDaniel and TverskyAmos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica, 47 (2), 263–91.
41.
KarniouchinaEkaterina V., CarsonStephen J., and MooreWilliam L. (2010), “A Note on Revenue Versus Profitability as Indicators of Motion Picture Performance,” (accessed September 9, 2015), [available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1712088].
42.
KellerKevin Lane (2002), Strategic Brand Management, 2nd ed. New York: Prentice Hall.
43.
KirmaniAmna and RaoAkshay R. (2000), “No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality,”Journal of Marketing, 64 (April), 66–79.
44.
KumarV., BhagwatYashoda, and ZhangXi (Alan) (2015), “Regaining ‘Lost’ Customers: The Predictive Power of First-Lifetime Behavior, the Reason for Defection, and the Nature of the Win-Back Offer,”Journal of Marketing, 79 (July), 34–55.
45.
LaneVicki R. (2000), “The Impact of Ad Repetition and Ad Content on Consumer Perceptions of Incongruent Extensions,”Journal of Marketing, 64 (April), 80–91.
46.
MannThomas C. and FergusonMelissa J. (2015), “Can We Undo Our First Impressions? The Role of Reinterpretation in Reversing Implicit Evaluations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108 (6), 823–49.
MasinSergio C., ZudiniVerena, and AntonelliMauro (2009), “Early Alternative Derivations of Fechner's Law,”Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 45 (1), 56–65.
49.
McAlisterLeigh (1982), “A Dynamic Attribute Satiation Model of Variety Seeking Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (2), 141–50.
50.
MizikNatalie and JacobsonRobert (2008), “The Financial Value Impact of Perceptual Brand Attributes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (February), 15–32.
51.
MizikNatalie and JacobsonRobert (2009), “Valuing Branded Businesses,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (November), 137–53.
52.
MonroeKent (1973), “Buyers’ Subjective Perceptions of Price,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (February), 70–80.
53.
MoormanChristine, WiesSimone, MizikNatalie, and SpencerFredrika J. (2012), “Firm Innovation and the Ratchet Effect Among Consumer Packaged Goods Firms,”Marketing Science, 31 (6), 934–51.
54.
MorewedgeCarey K., HuhYoung Yun, and VosgerauJoachim (2010), “Thought for Food: Imagined Consumption Reduces Actual Consumption,”Science, 330 (6010), 1530–33.
55.
MuggeRuth and DahlDarren W. (2013), “Seeking the Ideal Level of Design Newness: Consumer Response to Radical and Incremental Product Design,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (S1), 34–47.
NevinJohn A., McLeanAnthony P., and GraceRandolph C. (2001), “Resistance to Extinction: Contingency Termination and Generalization Decrement,”Animal Learning & Behavior, 29 (May), 176–91.
58.
NovemskyNathan and RatnerRebecca K. (2003), “The Time Course and Impact of Consumers’ Erroneous Beliefs About Hedonic Contrast Effects,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (4), 507–16.
59.
NowlisStephen M. and SimonsonItamar (1996), “The Effect of New Product Features on Brand Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (February), 36–46.
60.
ParkC. Whan, EisingerichAndreas B., and ParkJason Whan (2013), “Attachment-Aversion (AA) Model of Customer–Brand Relationships,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23 (2), 229–48.
61.
PavlovIvan P. (1957), Experimental Psychology and Other Essays. New York: Philosophical Library.
62.
PeresRenana, MullerEitan, and MahajanVijay (2010), “Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models: A Critical Review and Research Directions,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (2), 91–106.
RabinMatthew and SchragJoel L. (1999), “First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1), 37–82.
65.
RatnerRebecca K., KahnBarbara E., and KahnemanDaniel (1999), “Choosing Less Preferred Experiences for the Sake of Variety,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (1), 1–15.
66.
RavidS. Abraham (1999), “Information, Blockbusters, and Stars: A Study of the Film Industry,”Journal of Business, 72 (4), 463–92.
67.
RindovaViolina P. and PetkovaAntoaneta P. (2007), “When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, and Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations,”Organization Science, 18 (2), 217–32.
68.
RussellCristel Antonia and LevySydney (2012), “The Temporal and Focal Dynamics of Volitional Reconsumption: A Phenomenological Investigation of Repeated Hedonic Experiences,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (2), 341–59.
69.
SchönerGregor and ThelenEsther (2006), “Using Dynamic Field Theory to Rethink Infant Habituation,”Psychological Review, 113 (2), 273–99.
70.
ShimpTerence A., StuartElnora W., and EngleRandall W. (1991), “A Program of Classical Conditioning Experiments Testing Variations in the Conditioned Stimulus and Context,”Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (1), 1–12.
71.
Smith, Ethan (2011), “Sequels Come Fast, Furious as Studios Aim to Cut Risk,” The Wall Street Journal, Eastern Edition, (February 24), 257 (44), B1–B8.
72.
SoodSanjay and DrèzeXavier (2006), “Brand Extensions of Experiential Goods: Movie Sequel Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (3), 352–60.
73.
SoodSanjay and KellerKevin Lane (2012), “The Effects of Brand Name Structure on Brand Extension Evaluations and Parent Brand Dilution,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (June), 373–82.
74.
TellisGerard J., PrabhuJaideep C., and ChandyRajesh K. (2009), “Radical Innovation Across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (January), 3–23.
75.
ThompsonRichard F. (2009), “Habituation: A History,”Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 92 (2), 127–34.
76.
ThorndikeEdward L. (1911), Animal Intelligence: Experimental Studies. New York: Hafner.
77.
TschangF. Ted (2007), “Balancing the Tensions Between Rationalization and Creativity in the Video Game Industry,”Organization Science, 18 (6), 989–1005.
78.
Villas-BoasMiguel (2015), “A Short Survey on Switching Costs and Dynamic Competition,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32 (June), 219–22.
79.
VogelHarold L. (2011), Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial Analysis, 8th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
80.
VölcknerFranziska and SattlerHenrik (2006), “Drivers of Brand Extension Success,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (April), 18–34.
81.
WebberE.S., ChambersN.E., KostekJ.A., MankinD.E., and CromwellH.C. (2015), “Relative Reward Effects on Operant Behavior: Incentive Contrast, Induction, and Variety Effects,”Behavioural Processes, 116 (July), 87–99.
82.
ZhaoMin, HoefflerSteve, and DahlDarren W. (2009), “The Role of Imagination-Focused Visualization on New Product Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (February), 46–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
