Sharing systems are increasingly challenging sole ownership as the dominant means of obtaining product benefits, making up a market estimated at more than US$100 billion annually in 2010. Consumer options include cell phone minute-sharing plans, frequent-flyer-mile pools, bicycle-sharing programs, and automobile-sharing systems, among many others. However, marketing research has yet to provide a framework for understanding and managing these emergent systems. The authors conceptualize commercial sharing systems within a typology of shared goods. Using three studies, they demonstrate that beyond cost-related benefits of sharing, the perceived risk of scarcity related to sharing is a central determinant of its attractiveness. The results suggest that managers can use perceptions of personal and sharing partners’ usage patterns to affect risk perceptions and subsequent propensity to participate in a commercial sharing system.
AikenLeona. S., and WestSteven G., (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
2.
AlbaJoseph A., and HutchinsonWesley, (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(March), 411–54.
3.
BaronRuben M., and KennyDavid A., (1986), “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–82.
4.
BelkRussell, (2007), “Why Not Share Rather Than Own?”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126–40.
5.
BelkRussell, (2010), “Sharing,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36(February), 715–34.
6.
BenklerYochai, (2004), “Sharing Nicely: On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production,”Yale Law Journal, 114, 273–358.
7.
BlalockHerbert M.Jr., (1967), Toward a Theory of Minority Group Relations.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
BotsmanRachel, and RogersRoo, (2010), What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption.New York: HarperCollins.
9.
CoaseRonald, (1960), “The Problem of Social Cost,”Journal of Law and Economics, 3(October), 1–44.
10.
CunninghamGeorge, B., (2007), “Perceptions as Reality: The Influence of Actual and Perceived Demographic Similarity,”Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(1), 79–89.
Frost, & Sullivan, (2010), “Sustainable and Innovative Personal Transport Solutions: Strategic Analysis of Car Sharing Market in Europe,” (accessed March 13, 2012), [available at http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/svcg.pag/AT00].
13.
GalbrethMichael R., GhoshBikram, and ShorMikhael, (2012), “Social Sharing of Information Goods: Implications for Pricing and Profits,”Marketing Science, forthcoming.
14.
GanskyLisa, (2010), The Mesh: Why the Future of Business Is Sharing.New York: Portfolio.
15.
HardinGarret, (1968), “Tragedy of the Commons,”Science, 162(3859), 1243–48.
16.
HardinGarret, (2007), “The Tragedy of the Unmanaged Commons,” in Evolutionary Perspectives on Environmental Problems, PennDustin J., and MysterudIyer, eds. New Brunwick, NJ: Transaction, 105–107.
17.
HeathChip, and FennemaM.G., (1996), “Mental Depreciation and Marginal Decision Making,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(2), 95–108.
18.
Hennig-ThurauThorsten, HenningVictor, and SattlerHenrik, (2007), “Consumer File Sharing of Motion Pictures,”Journal of Marketing, 71(October), 1–18.
19.
HudsonJohn, and JonesPhilip H., (2005), “Public Goods: An Exercise in Calibration,”Public Choice, 124(3), 267–82.
20.
IyengarRaghuram, JedidiKamel, EsseghaierSkander, and DanaherPeter, (2011), “The Impact of Tariff Structure on Customer Retention, Usage, and Profitability of Access Services,”Marketing Science, 30(5), 820–36.
21.
KayAaron C., Christian WheelerS., BarghJohn A., and RossLee, (2004), “Material Priming: The Influence of Mundane Physical Objects on Situational Construal and Competitive Behavioral Choice,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(1), 83–96.
22.
KruppDaniel Brian, DebruineLisa M., and BarclayPat, (2008), “A Cue of Kinship Promotes Cooperation for the Public Good,”Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 49–55.
23.
LoewensteinGeorge F., HseeChristopher K., WeberElke U., and WelchNed, (2001), “Risk as Feelings,”Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–86.
24.
MarloweFrank, W., (2004), “What Explains Hazda Food Sharing?”Research in Economic Anthropology, 23, 69–88.
25.
MauseKarsten, (2008), “The Tragedy of the Commune: Learning from Worst-Case Scenarios,”Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1), 308–327.
26.
MayerRoger C., DavisJames H., and David SchoormanF., (1995), “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust,”Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
27.
Millard-BallAdam, MurrayGail, Ter SchureJessica, FoxChristine, and BurkhardtJon, (2005), TCRP Report 108: Car-Sharing: Where and How It Succeeds.Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
28.
MintonAnn, and RoseRandall L., (1997), “The Effects of Environmental Concern on Environmentally Friendly Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Business Research, 40(September), 37–48.
29.
NaylorRebecca Walker, LambertonCait Poynor, and NortonDavid A., (2011), “Seeing Ourselves in Others: Reviewer Ambiguity, Egocentric Anchoring, and Persuasion,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48(June), 617–31.
30.
OstromElinor, (2003), “How Types of Goods and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective Action,”Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 239–70.
31.
PottsMonica, (2011), “The Commons,”The American Prospect, (October), 6–11.
32.
PreacherKristopher J., and HayesAndrew F., (2008), “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models,”Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–91.
33.
RaghunathanRajagopal, and CorfmanKim, (2006), “Is Happiness Shared Doubled and Sadness Shared Halved? Social Influence on Enjoyment of Hedonic Experiences,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43(August), 386–94.
34.
RindfleischAric, and CrockettDavid, (1999), “Cigarette Smoking and Perceived Risk: A Multidimensional Investigation,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 18(Fall), 159–71.
35.
RousseauDenise M., SitkinSim B., BurtRonald S., and CamererColin, (1998), “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust,”Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.
SiegristMichael, CvetkovichGeorge T., and RothClaudia, (2000), “Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception,”Risk Analysis, 20(3), 353–62.
41.
SinhaRajiv K., and MandelNaomi, (2008), “Preventing Digital Music Piracy: The Carrot or the Stick?”Journal of Marketing, 72(January), 1–15.
42.
SmithJeffrey E., BellPaul A., and FuscoMarc E., (1988), “The Influence of Attraction on a Simulated Commons Dilemma,”Journal of General Psychology, 115(3), 277–84.
43.
ThalerRichard, (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,”Marketing Science, 4(Summer), 199–214.
44.
TurbanDaniel B., and JonesAlan P., (1988), “Supervisor–Subordinate Similarity: Types, Effects, and Mechanisms,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(May), 228–34.
45.
WinterhalderBruce, (1986), “Diet Choice, Risk, and Food Sharing in a Stochastic Environment,”Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5(December), 369–92.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
