Two-sided markets are composed of platform owners and two distinct user networks that either buy or sell applications for the platform. The authors focus on multihoming—the choice of an agent in a user network to use more than one platform. In the context of the video game console industry, they examine the conditions affecting seller-level multihoming decisions on a given platform. Furthermore, they investigate how platform-level multihoming of applications affects the sales of the platform. The authors show that increased platform-level multihoming of applications hurts platform sales, a finding consistent with literature on brand differentiation, but they also show that this effect vanishes as platforms mature or gain market share. The authors find that platform-level multihoming of applications affects platform sales more strongly than the number of applications. Furthermore, among mature platforms, an increasing market share leads to more seller-level multihoming, while among nascent platforms, seller-level multihoming decreases as platform market share increases. These findings prompt scholars to look beyond network size in analyzing two-sided markets and provide guidance to both (application) sellers and platform owners.
BasuAmiya, MazumdarTridib, and RajS.P., (2003), “Indirect Network Externality Effects on Product Attributes,”Marketing Science, 22(2), 209–221.
10.
BinkenJeroen L.G., and StremerschStefan, (2009), “The Effect of Superstar Software on Hardware Sales in System Markets,”Journal of Marketing, 73(March), 88–104.
CaillaudBernard, and JullienBruno, (2003), “Chicken and Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers,”RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309–328.
14.
CarpenterGregory S., GlazerRashi, and NakamotoKent, (1994), “Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 31(August), 339–50.
15.
CarpenterGregory S., and LehmannDonald R., (1985), “A Model of Marketing Mix, Brand Switching, and Competition,”Journal of Marketing Research, 22(August), 318–29.
16.
CarpenterGregory S., and NakamotoKent, (1989), “Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26(August), 285–98.
17.
CarrilloJuan D., and TanGuofu, (2006), “Platform Competition: The Role of Multihoming and Complementors,” NET Institute Working Paper 06-30, University of Southern California.
18.
ChoiJay Pil, (2007), “Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Multi-homing,” CESifo Working Paper No. 2073.
19.
ChurchJeffrey, and GandalNeil, (1992), “Network Effects, Software Provision, and Standardization,”Journal of Industrial Economics, 40(1), 85–103.
20.
ChurchJeffrey, and GandalNeil, (1993), “Complementary Network Externalities and Technological Adoption,”International Journal of Industrial Organization, 11(2), 239–60.
21.
ClementsMatthew T., and OhashiHiroshi, (2005), “Indirect Network Effects and the Product Cycle: Video Games in the U.S., 1994–2002,”Journal of Industrial Economics, 53(4), 515–42.
22.
CortsKenneth S., and LedermanMara, (2009), “Software Exclusivity and the Scope of Indirect Network Effects in the U.S. Home Video Game Market,”International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(2), 121–36.
DoganogluToker, and WrightJulian, (2006), “Multihoming and Compatibility,”International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(1), 45–67.
25.
DoganogluToker, and WrightJulian, (2010), “Exclusive Dealing with Network Effects,”International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(2), 145–54.
26.
DranoveDavid, and GandalNeil, (2003), “The DVD-vs.-DIVX Standard War: Empirical Evidence of Network Effects and Pre-announcement Effects,”Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(3), 363–86.
27.
EdlinAaron S., and ReichelsteinStefan J., (1996), “Holdups, Standard Breach Remedies, and Optimal Investment,”American Economic Review, 86(3), 478–501.
28.
EdwardsCliff, and GroverRonald, (2008), “Blu-ray's High-Definition Knockout,”BusinessWeek, (January 4).
29.
FeinbergFred M., KahnBarbara E., and McAlisterLeigh, (1992), “Market Share Response When Consumers Seek Variety,”Journal of Marketing Research, 29(May), 227–37.
30.
FrelsJudy K., ShervaniTasadduq, and SrivastavaRajendra K., (2003), “The Integrated Networks Model: Explaining Resource Allocations in Network Markets,”Journal of Marketing, 67(January), 29–45.
31.
GandalNeil, KendeMichael, and RobRafael, (2000), “The Dynamics of Technological Adoption in Hardware/Software Systems: The Case of Compact Disc Players,”RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), 43–61.
32.
GarenJohn, (1984), “The Returns to Schooling: A Selectivity Bias Approach with a Continuous Choice Variable,”Econometrica, 52(5), 1199–1218.
33.
GarenJohn, (1988), “Compensating Wage Differentials and the Endogeneity of Job Riskiness,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(1), 9–16.
34.
GhoshMrinal, DuttaShantanu, and StremerschStefan, (2006), “Customizing Complex Products: When Should the Vendor Take Control?”Journal of Marketing Research, 43(November), 664–79.
35.
HamiltonBarton H., and NickersonJackson A., (2003), “Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research,”Strategic Organization, 1(1), 53–80.
36.
HermalinBenjamin E., and KatzMichael L., (2006), “Your Network or Mine? The Economics of Routing Rules,”RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 692–719.
37.
Interactive Digital Software Association (2001), State of the Industry Report 2000–2001.Washington, DC.
38.
JonesJ.C.H., and WalshWilliam D., (1988), “Salary Determination in the National Hockey League: The Effects of Skills, Franchise Characteristics, and Discrimination,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41(4), 592–604.
39.
KatzMichael L., and ShapiroCarl, (1985), “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility,”American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–40.
40.
KatzMichael L., and ShapiroCarl, (1994), “Systems Competition and Network Effects,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93–115.
41.
LeNagard-AssayagEmmanuelle, and ManceauDelphine, (2001), “Modeling the Impact of Product Preannouncements in the Context of Indirect Network Externalities,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18(3), 203–219.
MantenaRavi, SankaranarayananRamesh, and ViswanathanSiva, (2007), “Exclusive Licensing in Complementary Network Industries,” NET Institute Working Paper No. 07-04.
44.
NairHarikesh, ChintaguntaPradeep, and DubéJean-Pierre, (2004), “Empirical Analysis of Indirect Network Effects in the Market for Personal Digital Assistants,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2(1), 23–58.
RochetJean-Charles, and TiroleJean, (2003), “Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets,”Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.
47.
RochetJean-Charles, and TiroleJean, (2006), “Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report,”RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645–67.
48.
RoweG., (1999), “Where's Your White Stick, Ref,”The Irish Times, (May 3), 18.
49.
RysmanMarc, (2004), “Competition Between Networks: A Study of the Market for Yellow Pages,”Review of Economic Studies, 71(2), 483–512.
50.
SchillingMelissa, A., (1999), “Winning the Standards Race: Building Installed Base and the Availability of Complementary Goods,”European Management Journal, 17(3), 265–74.
51.
SchillingMelissa, A., (2002), “Technology Success and Failure in Winner-Take-All Markets: The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing and Network Externalities,”Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 387–98.
52.
SchwarzMichael, and TakhteyevYuri, (2010), “Half a Century of Public Software Institutions: Open Source as a Solution to the Hold-Up Problem,”Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12(4), 609–639.
53.
ShankarVenkatesh, and BayusBarry L., (2003), “Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Video Game Industry,”Strategic Management Journal, 24(4), 375–84.
54.
ShapiroCarl, (1999), “Exclusivity in Network Industries,”George Mason Law Review, 7(3), 673–84.
55.
StremerschStefan, TellisGerard J., FransesPhilip Hans, Jeroenand, BinkenL.G., (2007), “Indirect Network Effects in New Product Growth,”Journal of Marketing, 71(July), 52–74.
56.
TuckerCatherine, and ZhangJuanjuan, (2010), “Growing Two-Sided Networks by Advertising the User Base: A Field Experiment,”Marketing Science, 29(5), 805–814.
57.
WhiteHalbert, (1980), “A Heteroscedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity,”Econometrica, 48(4), 817–38.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
