The aluminum (2p) electron spectra of several anhydrous and “hydrous” aluminum oxides have been recorded, and the binding energies have been measured. A simple electrostatic model is employed to explain the observed shift in binding energy and relate it to differences in structure and hydrogen bonding. Two conclusions can be drawn: structural differences must be considered when interpreting photoelectron spectra for inorganic crystalline substances; and hydrogen bonding with anions may have a measurable effect on the binding energy of core electrons of the cations.
SiegbahnK.NordlingC.FahlmanA.NordbergR.HamrinK.HedmanJ.JohanssonG.BergmarkT.KarlssonW. E.LindgrenI.LindbergB., ESCA: Atomic, Molecular and Solid State Structure Studied by Means of Electron Spectroscopy (Almqvist and Wiksells Boktryckeri Ab., Uppsala, 1967).
2.
NewsomeJ. W.HeiserH. W.RussellA. S.StumpfH. C., Alcoa Research Laboratories Technical Paper No. 10, Second Revision, 1960.
3.
NefedovV. I.UrusovV. S.KakhanaM. M., Geokhimiya, No. 1, p. 11–19, (1972); Geochem. Int. in press.
4.
StecW. J.MorganW. E.AlderidgeR. G.van WazerJ. R., Inorg. Chem.11, 219 (1972).
5.
SwartzW. E.Jr.WattsP. H.Jr.WattsJ. C.BraschJ. W.LippincottE. R., Anal. Chem.26, 2001 (1972).
6.
HnatowichD. J.HudisJ.PerlmanM. L.RagainiR. C., J. Appl. Phys.42, 4883 (1971).
7.
WellsA. F., Structural Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd ed. (Oxford at the Clarendon Press, London, 1962).
8.
MegawH. D., Z. Krist.87, 185 (1934).
9.
MontoroV., Ric. Sci.13, 565 (1942).
10.
MilliganW. O., J. Phys. Colloid Chem. 55, 497 (1951).
11.
UnmackA., Abstracts of Second International Congress of Crystallography, Stockholm, 1951, p. G-8.