Accurately computing molecular Raman spectra would enable rapid development of inexpensive and extensive Raman libraries. This is especially beneficial for chemicals that are regulated, toxic, or otherwise difficult to handle. Numerous quantum mechanical methods have been developed that enable computation of Raman spectra. Here, we study the B3LYP exchange correlation functional with various combinations of basis sets, polarization functions, and diffuse functions to determine which combination best computes the Raman spectra for explosive and nonexplosive molecules. In comparing spectra, three metrics were utilized: the root mean square error, the earth mover's distance, and the weighted cross-correlation average. The earth mover's distance and weighted cross-correlation metrics are shown to have significantly greater power at detecting spectral similarities and differences than the root mean square error. Across all methods and molecules examined, B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) was found to provide the best match between measured and computed Raman spectra. Spectra generated at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level were found to be accurate enough to correctly identify each molecule out of a set of measured molecular spectra.
KomornickiA.McIverJ. W., J. Chem. Phys.70, 2014 (1979).
9.
DorsettH.WhiteA., Overview of molecular modelling and ab initio molecular orbital methods suitable for use with energetic materials (Weapons Systems Division, Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory, Defense Science and Technology Organization, 2000), technical report.
10.
HallsM. D.SchlegelH. B., J. Chem. Phys.111, 8819 (1999).
11.
NIST computational chemistry comparison and benchmark database, NIST standard reference database number 101, release 14, JohnsonR. D.III Ed. (NIST, Gaithersberg, MD, 2006).
12.
StephensP. J.DevlinF. J.ChabalowskiC. F.FrischM. J., J. Chem. Phys.98, 11623 (1994).
13.
Jimenez-HoyosC. A.JaneskoB. G.ScuseriaG. E., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.10, 6621 (2008).
14.
DitchfieldR.HehreW. J.PopleJ. A., J. Chem. Phys.54, 724 (1971).
15.
HehreW. J.DitchfieldR.PopleJ. A., J. Chem. Phys.56, 2257 (1972).
16.
HehreW. J.LathanW. A., J. Chem. Phys.56, 5255 (1972).
17.
HariharanP. C.PopleJ. A., Theor. Chim. Acta28, 213 (1973).
18.
HariharanP. C.PopleJ. A., Mol. Phys.27, 209 (1974).
19.
GordonM. S., Chem. Phys. Lett.76, 163 (1980).
20.
KrishnanR.SchlegelH. B.PopleJ. A., J. Chem. Phys.72, 650 (1980).
21.
DunningT. H., J. Chem. Phys.90, 1007 (1989).
22.
WoonD. E.DunningT. H., J. Chem. Phys.98, 1358 (1993).
23.
DunningT.Jr.HayP., Methods of Electronic Structure Theory (Plenum Press, New York, 1977), pp. 1–28.
24.
BlaudeauJ.McGrathM.CurtissL.RadomL., J. Chem. Phys.107, 5016 (1997).
25.
BinningR. C.Jr.CurtissL. A., J. Comp. Chem.11, 1206 (1990).
26.
WadtW.HayP., J. Chem. Phys.82, 284 (1985).
27.
WadtW.HayP., J. Chem. Phys.82, 299 (1985).
28.
HayP.WadtW., J. Chem. Phys.82, 270 (1985).
29.
CarbonniereP.LuccaT.PouchanC.RegaN.BaroneV., J. Comp. Chem.26, 384 (2005).
30.
MukherjeeV.SinghK.SinghN. P.YadavR. A., Vib. Spectrosc.47, 26 (2008).
31.
NielsenC. J.HornA.KlaeboeP.GuirgisG. A., J. Mol. Struct.886, 90 (2008).
32.
SundaraganesanN.Dominic JoshuaB.MeganathanC.MeenashiR.CornardJ. P., Spectrochim. Acta, Part A70, 376 (2008).
33.
ChelmeckaE.PasternyK.Gawlik-JedryiakM.SzejaW.WrzalikR., J. Mol. Struct.834, 498 (2007).
34.
KrishnakumarV.SeshadriS., Spectrochim. Acta, Part A68, 833 (2007).
35.
Castillo-CharáJ.Manrique-BastidasC.MinabN.CastroM. E.Hernández-RiveraS. P., Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.6756, 67560G (2007).
36.
KunzA. B., Phys. Rev. B53, 9733 (1996).
37.
UmezawaN.KaliaR. K.NakanoA.VashistaP.ShimojoF., J. Chem. Phys.126, 234702 (2007).
38.
SmithG. D.BharadwajR. K., J. Phys. Chem. B103, 3570 (1999).
Alzate RodriguezL. F., M.S. Thesis, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagũez Campus (2005).
42.
QuinteroD. N., M.S. Thesis, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagũez Campus (2006).
43.
SandovalG. M. H., M.S. Thesis, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagũez Campus (2006).
44.
MontoyaE., M.S. Thesis, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagũez Campus (2007).
45.
De GelderR.WehrensR.HagemanJ. A., J. Comp. Chem.22, 273 (2001).
46.
RubnerY.TomasiC.GuibasL. J., Int. J. Comput. Vision40, 99 (2000).
47.
AndersonE.VeithG. D.WeiningerD., Smiles: A line notation and computerized interpreter for chemical structures (U.S. EPA, Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth, MN, 1987), technical report.
CaseD. A.CheathamT. E.DardenT.GohlkeH.LuoR.MerzK. M.OnufrievA.SimmerlingC.WangB.WoodsR. J., J. Comp. Chem.26, 1668 (2005).
50.
SchmidtM. W.BaldridgeK. K.BoatzJ. A.ElbertS. T.GordonM. S.JensenJ. H.KosekiS.MatsunagaN.NguyenK. A.SuS.WindusT. L.DupuisM.MontgomeryJ. A., J. Comp. Chem.14, 1347 (1993).
51.
DykstraC.FrenkingG.KimK.ScuseriaG., Eds., Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry: The First Forty Years (Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 2005).
52.
VoskoS. H.WilkL.NusairM., Can. J. Phys.58, 1200 (1980).
53.
KendallR. A.DunningT. H.HarrisonR. J., J. Chem. Phys.96, 6796 (1992).
54.
ScottA. P.RadomL., J. Chem. Phys.100, 16502 (1996).
55.
IrikuraK. K.JohnsonR. D.KackerR. N., J. Phys. Chem. A109, 8430 (2005).
