Optical Interference Effects in the Design of Substrates for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy

Abstract

This paper presents results showing that the design of substrates used for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) can impact the apparent enhancement factors (EFs) obtained due to optical interference effects that are distinct from SERS, providing additional enhancement of the Raman intensity. Thus, a combination of SERS and a substrate designed to maximize interference-based enhancement is demonstrated to give additional Raman intensity above that observed for SERS alone. The system explored is 4-nitroazobenzene (NAB) and biphenyl (BP) chemisorbed on a nanostructured silver film obtained by vacuum deposition of Ag on thermally oxidized silicon wafers. The enhancing silver layer is partially transparent, enabling a standing wave to form as a result of the combination of the incident light and light reflected from the underlying Si substrate (i.e., light that passes through the Ag and the intervening dielectric layer of SiOx). The Raman intensity is measured as a function of the thickness of the thermal oxide layer in the range from ∼150 to ∼400 nm, and despite a lack of morphological variation in the silver films, there is a strong dependence of the Raman intensity on the oxide thickness. The Raman signal for the optimal SiO_x interlayer thickness is 38 times higher than the intensity obtained when the Ag particles are deposited directly onto Si (with native oxide). To account for the trends observed in the Raman intensity versus thickness data, calculations of the relative mean square electric field (MSEF) at the surface of the SiO_x are carried out. These calculations are also used to further optimize the experimental setup.

Keywords

Raman spectroscopy Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy SERS Silver island films Interference

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akkerman

H. B.

and De Boer

, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 013001 (2008).

Lindsay

S. M.

and Ratner

M. A

, Adv. Mater. 19, 23 (2007).

McCreery

, Chem. Mater. 16, 4477 (2004).

McCreery

R. L.

, Anal. Chem. 78, 3490 (2006).

Metzger

R. M.

, Chem. Rev. 103, 3803 (2003).

Holman

M. W.

Liu

and Adams

D. M

, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 12649 (2003).

Jun

and Zou

X.-Y

, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 13224 (2004).

Kaake

L. G.

Zou

Panzer

M. J.

Frisbie

C. D.

and Zhu

X.-Y

, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 7824 (2007).

Richter

C. A.

Hacker

C. A.

and Richter

L. J

, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 21836 (2005).

10.

Robinson

D. B.

Funamura

J. R.

Talin

A. A.

and Anderson

R. J

, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 083119 (2007).

11.

McCreery

and Kalakodimi

R. P

, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 2572 (2006).

12.

Nowak

A. M.

and McCreery

R. L

, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 16621 (2004).

13.

Liang

Tian

and McCreery

R. L

, Appl. Spectrosc. 61, 613 (2007).

14.

Haynes

C. L.

McFarland

A. D.

and Duyne

R. P. V

, Anal. Chem. 77, 338A (2005).

15.

Willets

K. A.

and Van Duyne

R. P

, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58, 267 (2007).

16.

Aravind

P. K.

and Metiu

, Surf. Sci. 124, 506 (1983).

17.

Jain

P. K.

Huang

and El-Sayed

M. A

, Nano Lett. 7, 2080 (2007).

18.

Wind

M. M.

Bobbert

P. A.

Vlieger

and Bedeaux

, Physica A 143, 164 (1987).

19.

Banholzer

M. J.

Millstone

J. E.

Qin

and Mirkin

C. A

, Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 885 (2008).

20.

Lal

Grady

N. K.

Kundu

Levin

C. S.

Lassiter

J. B.

and Halas

N. J

, Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 898 (2008).

21.

Baker

G. A.

and Moore

D. S

, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 382, 1751 (2005).

22.

Lacy

W. B.

Olson

L. G.

and Harris

J. M

, Anal. Chem. 71, 2564 (1999).

23.

Lacy

W. B.

Williams

J. M.

Wenzler

L. A.

Beebe

T. P.

Jr. , and Harris

J. M.

, Anal. Chem. 68, 1003 (1996).

24.

Bacsa

W. S.

and Lannin

J. S

, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 19 (1992).

25.

Bingler

H.-G.

Brunner

Leitner

Aussenegg

F. R.

and Wokan

, Mol. Phys. 85, 587 (1995).

26.

Connell

G. A. N.

Nemanich

R. J.

and Tsai

C. C

, Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 31 (1980).

27.

Lenac

and Tomas

M. S

, J. Raman Spectrosc. 22, 831 (1991).

28.

Allongue

Delamar

Desbat

Fagebaume

Hitmi

Pinson

and Savéant

J.-M

, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 201 (1997).

29.

Pavia

D. L.

Lampman

G. M.

Kriz

G. S.

and Engel

R. G

, Organic Laboratory Techniques: A Microscale Approach (Saunders College Publishing, New York, 1995), 2nd ed.

30.

Hurley

B. L.

and McCreery

R. L

, J. Electrochem. Soc. 151, B252 (2004).

31.

Pinson

and Podvorica

, Chem. Soc. Rev. 34, 429 (2005).

32.

Edwards

G. A.

Bergren

A. J.

Cox

E. J.

and Porter

M. D

, J. Electroanal. Chem. 622, 193 (2008).

33.

Ramsey

Ranganathan

McCreery

R. L.

and Zhao

, Appl. Spectrosc. 55, 767 (2001).

34.

Itoh

and McCreery

R. L

, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 10894 (2002).

35.

Nowak

A. M.

and McCreery

R. L

, Anal. Chem. 76, 1089 (2004).

36.

S. S. C.

Tan

E. S. Q.

Jane

R. T.

and Downard

A. J

, Langmuir 23, 11074 (2007).

37.

Kalakodimi

R. P.

Nowak

A. M.

and McCreery

R. L

, Chem. Mater. 17, 4939 (2005).

38.

Schlegel

V. L.

and Cotton

T. M

, Anal. Chem. 63, 241 (1991).

39.

Gunnarsson

Rindzevicius

Prikulis

Kasemo

Kall

Zou

and Schatz

G. C

, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 1079 (2005).

40.

K.-H.

Wei

Q.-H.

Zhang

Mock

J. J.

Smith

D. R.

and Schultz

, Nano Lett. 3, 1087 (2003).

41.

Stole

S. M.

and Porter

M. D

, Appl. Spectrosc. 44, 1418 (1990).

42.

Porter

M. D.

Bright

T. B.

Allara

D. L.

and Kuwana

, Anal. Chem. 58, 2461 (1986).

43.

Porter

M. D.

, Anal. Chem. 60, 1143A (1988).

44.

Popenoe

D. D.

Stole

S. M.

and Porter

M. D

, Appl. Spectrosc. 46, 79 (1992).

45.

Lynch

D. W.

and Hunter

W. R

, “Optical Constants of Metals”, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, Palik

Ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998).

46.

Parikh

A. N.

and Allara

D. L

, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 927 (1992).