Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Chernozem Humic Acid and Their Fractions Obtained by Coupled Size Exclusion Chromatography—Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SEC-PAGE)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2006
Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Chernozem Humic Acid and Their Fractions Obtained by Coupled Size Exclusion Chromatography—Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SEC-PAGE)
A humic acid extracted from a chernozem soil was fractionated combining size exclusion chromatography and polyacrylamide electrophoresis (SEC-PAGE). Three fractions named A, B, and C+D, with different electrophoretic mobilities and molecular sizes (MS), were obtained and subsequently characterized by thermochemolysis and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). The data confirmed that fraction A, with the higher MS, was more aliphatic than fractions B and C+D and, in turn, fractions with lower MS (B and C+D) denoted an enrichment in lignin residues. These structural features explain conformational changes when varying the pH in the humic fraction A and indicated that combination of the two techniques is a good approach for characterizing humic substances.
Schmitt-KopplinP.GarrisonA. W.PerdueE. M.FreitagD. and KettrupA, J. Chromatogr., A807, 101 (1998).
2.
De NobiliM. and ChenY, Soil Sci.164, 825 (1999).
3.
MullerM. B.SchmittD. and FrimmelF. H, Environ. Sci. Technol.34, 4867 (2000).
4.
JanošP., J. Chromatogr., A983, 1 (2003).
5.
ReemtsmaT. and TheseA, Anal. Chem.75, 1500 (2003).
6.
TrubetskojO. A.TrubetskayaO. E.Afanas'evaG. V.ReznikovaO. I. and Saiz-JimenezC, J. Chromatogr., A767, 285 (1997).
7.
TrubetskayaO. E.Afanas'evaG. V.ReznikovaO. I.MarkovaL. F.MuranovaT. A. and TrubetskojO. A, Environ. Int.24, 573 (1998).
8.
RichardC.TrubetskayaO. A.TrubetskojO. E.ReznikovaO. I.Afanas'evaG. V.AguerJ. P. and GuyotG, Environ. Sci. Technol.38, 2052 (2004).
9.
SimpsonA. J.BurdonJ.GrahamC. L.HayesM. H. B.SpencerN. and KingeryW. L, Eur. J. Soil Sci.52, 495 (2001).
10.
SimpsonA. J.KingeryW. L.HayesM. H. B.SpraulM.HumpferE.DvortsakP.KerssebaumR.GodejohannM. and HoffmannM, Naturwissenschaften89, 84 (2002).
11.
Saiz-JimenezC.HermosinB.GuggenbergerG. and ZechW, Eur. J. Soil. Sci.47, 61 (1996).
12.
HildebrandtP. and StockburgerM, J. Phys. Chem.88, 5935 (1994).
13.
MoskovitsM., Rev. Mod. Phys.57, 783 (1985).
14.
WokaunA., Mol. Phys.56, 1 (1985).
15.
FranciosoO.Sanchez-CortesS.TugnoliV.CiavattaC.SittiL. and GessaC, Appl. Spectrosc.50, 1165 (1996).
16.
FranciosoO.Sanchez-CortesS.TugnoliV.CiavattaC. and GessaC, Appl. Spectrosc.55, 270 (1998).
17.
KoglinE. and SequarisJ. M, “Surface enhanced Raman scattering of biomolecules”, in Topics in Current Chemistry, BorgstedtH. U. Ed. (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1986), pp. 1–57.
18.
Saiz-JimenezC.TrubetskayaO. E.TrubetskojO. A. and HermosinB, Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.30, 345 (1999).
19.
TrubetskojO. A.KudryavcevaL. Y. and ShirshovaL. T, Soil Biol. Biochem.23, 1179 (1991).
