Little is known about how criminal justice officials perceive the efficacy and scope of sex offender registration and community notification (SORN) procedures. This study examines the attitudes regarding SORN among a sample of law enforcement agency supervisors/managers using a survey methodology and the Community Attitudes Toward Sex Offenders (CATSO) scale. Results show that law enforcement officials tend to hold harsh views about sex offenders. Additionally, the CATSO appears to be an efficient way of categorising the views of law enforcement officials. When considered relative to other populations, law enforcement officials appear to hold views similar to college students, and in contrast to other criminal justice officials.
AndersonA. L.SampleL. L. (2008). Public awareness and action resulting from sex offender community notification laws. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 371–396.
2.
BarnesJ. C.DukesT.TewksburyR.De TroyeT. (2009). Predicting the impact of a statewide residence restriction law on South Carolina sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 21–43.
3.
BurchfieldK. B. (2012). Assessing community residents' perceptions of local registered sex offenders: Results from a pilot survey. Deviant Behavior, 33, 241–259.
4.
ChurchW. T.WakemanE. E.MillerS. L.ClementsC. B.SunF. (2008). The Community Attitudes Toward Sex Offenders scale: The development of a psychometric assessment instrument. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 251–259.
5.
ConleyT.HillK.ChurchW. T.StoeckelE.AllenH. (2011). Assessing probation and community corrections workers' attitudes toward sex offenders using the Community Attitudes Toward Sex Offenders (CATSO) scale in a rural state. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 18, 75–85.
6.
ConnorD. P. (2012). Prison warden's perceptions of sex offenders, sex offender registration, community notification, and residency restrictions. (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.
7.
CraunS. (2010). Evaluating awareness of registered sex offenders in the neighborhood. Crime and Delinquency, 56, 414–435.
8.
DatzA. L. (2009). Sex offender residency restrictions and other sex offender management strategies: The probation officer perspective in Florida. Tallahassee, FL: Bureau of Probation and Parole Field Services.
9.
FarkasM. A.MillerG. (2007). Reentry and reintegration: Challenges faced by families of convicted sex offenders. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 20, 88–92.
10.
FinnP. (1997). Sex offender community notification. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
11.
GainesJ. S. (2006). Law enforcement reactions to sex offender registration and community notification. Police Practice and Research, 7, 249–267.
12.
HogueT. E. (1993). Attitudes towards prisoners and sexual offenders. In ClarkN. C.StephensonG. (Eds.), DCLP occasional papers: Sexual offenders (pp. 27–32). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
13.
KernsmithP. D.ComartinE.CraunS. W.KernsmithR. M. (2009). The relationship between sex offender registry utilization and awareness. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 181–193.
14.
LeaS.AuburnT.KibblewhiteK. (1999). Working with sex offenders: The perceptions and experiences of professionals and paraprofessionals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43 (1), 103–119.
15.
LevensonJ. S.BrannonT. N.FortneyT.BakerJ. N. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 1–25.
16.
LevensonJ. S.CotterL. P. (2005). The effect of Megan's Law on sex offender reintegration. International Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 49–66.
17.
LevensonJ. S.TewksburyR. (2009). Collateral damage: Family members of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 54–68.
18.
LevensonJ. S.ZgobaK. M.TewksburyR. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Sensible crime policy or flawed logic?Federal Probation, 71 (3), 2–9.
19.
LiebR.NunlistC. (2008). Community notification as viewed by Washington's citizens: A 10-year follow-Up. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
20.
LoganW. A. (2009). Knowledge as power: Criminal registration and community notification laws in America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
RedlichA. D. (2001). Community notification: Perceptions of its effectiveness in preventing child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 10, 91–116.
22.
SampleL. L.KadleckC. (2008). Sex offender laws: Legislators' accounts of the need for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 40–62.
23.
SociaK. M. (2011). The police implications of residence restrictions on sex offender housing in Upstate New York. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 351–389.
24.
TewksburyR. (2004). Experiences and attitudes of registered female sex offenders. Federal Probation, 68 (3), 30–33.
25.
TewksburyR. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 67–82.
26.
TewksburyR. (2006). Sex offender registries as a tool for public safety: Views from registered offenders. Western Criminology Review, 7 (1), 1–8.
27.
TewksburyR.HumkeyT. (2010). Prohibiting registered sex offenders from being at school: Assessing the collateral consequences of a public policy. Justice Policy Journal, 7 (2). Retrieved from http://www.cjcj.org/justice_policy_journal
28.
TewksburyR.JenningsW. G. (2010). Assessing the impact of sex offender registration and community notification on sex offending trajectories. Criminal Justice and Behavio, 37, 570–582.
29.
TewksburyR.LeesM. B. (2007). Perceptions of punishment: How registered sex offenders view registries. Crime & Delinquency53, 380–407.
30.
TewksburyR.LevensonJ. S. (2009). Stress experiences of family members of registered sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 611–626.
31.
TewksburyR.MustaineE. E. (2007). Collateral consequences and community reentry for registered sex offenders with child victims: Are the challenges even greater?Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46, 113–131.
32.
TewksburyR.MustaineE. E. (2012). Parole board members views of sex offender registration and community notification. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 413–431.
33.
TewksburyR.MustaineE. E.PayneB. K. (2011). Community corrections professionals' views of sex offenders, sex offender registration and community notification and residency restrictions. Federal Probation, 75 (3), 45–50.
34.
TewksburyR.MustaineE. E.PayneB. K. (2012). Community corrections professionals' views about sex offenders: Is the CATSO applicable?Criminal Justice Studies, 25, 145–157.
35.
VessJ.DayA.PowellM.GraffamJ. (in press). International sex offender registration laws: Research and evaluation issues based on a review of current scientific literature. Police Practice and Research.
36.
ZevitzR. G.FarkasM. A. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Examining the importance of neighborhood meetings. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 393–408.
37.
ZgobaK. M.VeyseyB. M.DalessandroM. (2010). An analysis of the effectiveness of community notification and registration: Do the best intentions predict the best practices?Justice Quarterly, 27, 667–691.
