Sex offender registrationwas widely implemented in the 1990s as a means of enhancingcommunity awareness of sex offenders to promote community safety. This study is one of the first examinations of the collateral consequences of sex offender registration from the perspective of the offender. Drawing on data from 121 registered sex offenders in Kentucky, this research shows that social stigmatization, loss of relationships, employment, and housing, and both verbal and physical assaults are experienced by a significant minority of registered sex offenders.
Adams, D. B. (2002). Summary of state sex offender registries, 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
2.
Adkins, G., Huff, D., & Stageberg, P. (2000). The Iowa sex offender registry and recidivism. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Human Rights.
3.
Avrahamian, K. A. (1998). A critical perspective: Do “Megan’s Laws” really shield children from sex-predators?Journal of Juvenile Law, 19, 301-317.
4.
Beccaria, C. (1963). On crimes and punishment. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1764)
5.
Bell, M. L. (1996). Pennsylvania’s sex offender community notification law: Will it protect communities from repeat sex offenders?Duquesne Law Review, 34, 635-660.
6.
Bolding, M. (1997). California’s registration and community notification statute: Does it protect the public from convicted sex offenders?Western State University Law Review, 25 (1), 81-115.
7.
Burton, V. S., Jr., Cullen, F. T., & Travis, L. F., III. (1987). The collateral consequences of a felony conviction: A national study of state statutes. Federal Probation, 51 (3), 52-60.
8.
Dalley, L. P. (2000). Imprisoned mothers and their children: Their often conflicting legal rights. Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy, 22 (1), 1-44.
9.
Dodge, M., & Pogrebin, M. R. (2001). Collateral costs of imprisonment for women: Complications of reintegration. Prison Journal, 81 (1), 42-54.
10.
Gabel, K., & Johnston, D. (1996). Children of incarcerated parents. New York: Lexington Books.
11.
Goffman, E. (1962). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. New York: Touchstone Books.
12.
Hagan, J., & Dinovitzer, R. (1999). Collateral consequences of imprisonment for children, communities and prisoners. In Prisons (pp. 121-162). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Heim, N. (1981). Sexual behavior of castrated sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19 (1), 11-19.
14.
Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2002). Social exclusion—Pedophile style. In Inappropriate relationships: The unconventional, the disapproved, and the forbidden (pp. 221-243). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. New York: New Press.
16.
Olivares, K. M., Burton, V., Jr., & Cullen, F. T. (1996). The collateral consequences of a felony conviction: A national study of state legal codes 10 years later. Federal Probation, 60 (3), 10-17.
17.
Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108 (5), 937-975.
18.
Petersilia, J. (2001a). When prisoners return to communities: Political, economic and social consequences. Federal Probation, 65 (1), 3-8.
19.
Petersilia, J. (2001b). When prisoners return to the community: Political, economic, and social consequences. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5 (3), 1-10.
20.
Petrosino, A. J., & Petrosino, C. (1999). The public safety potential of Megan’s Law in Massachusetts: An assessment from a sample of criminal sexual psychopaths. Crime and Delinquency, 45 (1), 140-158.
21.
Plotnikoff, J., & Woolfson, R. (2000). Where are they now? An evaluation of sex offender registration in England and Wales. London: Home Office.
22.
Pogrebin, M., Dodge, M., & Katsampes, P. (2001). The collateral costs of short-term jail incarceration: The long-term social and economic disruptions. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5 (4), 64-69.
23.
Prentky, R. A. (1996). Community notification and constructive risk reduction. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11 (2), 295-298.
24.
Presser, L., & Gunnison, E. (1999). Strange bedfellows: Is sex offender notification a form of community justice?Crime and Delinquency, 45 (3), 299-315.
25.
Quinn, J. F., Forsyth, C. J., & Mullen-Quinn, C. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25 (3), 215-232.
26.
Sack, W. H., & Mason, R. (1980). Child abuse and conviction of sexual crimes: Apreliminary finding. Law and Human Behavior, 4 (3), 211-215.
27.
Szymkowiak, K., & Fraser, T. (2002). Registered sex offenders in Hawaii. Honolulu, HI: Department of the Attorney General.
28.
Tewksbury, R. (2002). Validity and utility of the Kentucky sex offender registry. Federal Probation, 66 (1), 21-26.
29.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Geographic comparison table, Kentucky—County. American fact finder. Retrieved May 23, 2004, from http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en
30.
Vandiver, D. M., & Walker, J. T. (2002). Female sex offenders: An overview and analysis of 40 cases. Criminal Justice Review, 27 (2), 284-300.
31.
Weisheit, R. A., & Klofas, J. M. (1989). The impact of jail: Collateral costs and affective response. Journal of Offender Counseling Services and Rehabilitation, 14 (1), 51-65.
32.
Zevitz, R. G., & Farkas, M. (2000a). Sex offender community notification: Examining the importance of neighborhood meetings. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18 (2-3), 393-408.
33.
Zevitz, R. G., & Farkas, M. (2000b). Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance?Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18 (2-3), 375-391.
