This study utilised qualitative semi-structured interviews with 11 detectives from a single UK police force, in an attempt to understand if, how, and why offender profiling can be operationally useful to police officers. Although some positive opinions were expressed, overall this study found the detectives to be dissatisfied customers of the service of offender profilers. Common complaints included profiles widening the field of investigation to unmanageable proportions in terms of suspects and cases, not telling police anything that they did not already know, profilers breaching the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, and advice being simply common sense or too general. Police also reported feeling pressurised into continued use, despite their scepticism.
AinsworthP. B. (2001). Offender profiling and crime analysis. Cullompton: Willan.
2.
AlisonL.BarrettM. (2004). The interpretation and utilisation of offender profiles: A critical review of ‘traditional’ approaches to profiling. 58–77. In AdlerJ. A. (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Concepts, debates, and practice. Cullompton: Willan.
3.
AlisonL.BennellC.MokrosA.OrmerodD. (2002). The personality paradox in offender profiling. A theoretical review of the processes involved in deriving background characteristics from crime scene actions. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 8, 115–135.
4.
AlmondL.AlisonL.PorterL. (2007). An evaluation and comparison of claims made in behavioural investigative advice reports compiled by the National Policing Improvements Agency in the United Kingdom. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 4(2), 71–83.
5.
BaumeisterR.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–70.
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
7.
CopsonG. (1995), Coals to Newcastle? Part one: A study of offender profiling (Special interest series paper 7). London: Home Office.
8.
ElliottR.FischerC. T.RennieD. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215–229.
9.
FlowersP.HartG.MarriottC. (1999). Constructing sexual health: Gay men and ‘risk’ in the context of a public sex environment. Journal of Health Psychology, 4(4), 483–495.
10.
GudjonssonG. H.CopsonG. (1997). The role of the expert in criminal investigation. 61–76. In JacksonJ. L.BekerianD. A. (Eds.), Offender profiling: Theory, research and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
11.
JacksonJ. L.BekerianD. A. (Eds.). (1997). Offender profiling: Theory, research and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
12.
JacksonJ. L.Van KoppenP. J.HerbrinkC. M. (1993). Does the service meet the needs? An evaluation of consumer satisfaction with specific profile analysis and investigative advice as offered by the Scientific Research Advisory Unit of the National Criminal Intelligence Division (CRI), The Netherlands (NISCALE Report NSCR, 93-05). Leiden: The Netherlands Institute for the Study of Criminality and Law Enforcement.
13.
KvaleS. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
National Policing Improvement Agency. (n.d.). Website. Accessed July 28, 2008, http://www.npia.police.uk/.
15.
PetherickW. (2002). The fallacy of accuracy in criminal profiling. Journal of Behavioural Profiling, 3(1).
16.
SamuelsonW.ZeckhauserR. (1988). Status-quo biases in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–89.
17.
SnookB.HainesA.TaylorP. J.BennellC. (2007). Criminal profiling belief and use: A study of Canadian police officer opinion. Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 5(3), 169–179.
18.
TragerT. J.BrewsterJ. (2001). The effectiveness of psychological profiles. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 16(1), 20–28.
19.
TurnerA.BarlowJ.IlberyB. (2002). Play hurt, live hurt: Living with and managing osteoarthritis from the perspective of exprofessional footballers. Journal of Health Psychology, 7(3), 285–301.
20.
WilsonM. A.CanterD.JackK. (1997). The psychology of rape investigation: A study in police decision-making. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.
