Abstract
BACKGROUND:
A generic formulation of amiodarone was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration based on single-dose equivalence data. Because amiodarone has complex pharmacokinetic properties, a narrow therapeutic range, and a significant adverse effect profile, concern about equivalency persists.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare steady-state plasma concentrations of the brand-name reference product Cordarone with the AB-rated generic formulation, Pacerone, in patients exposed to both products.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was performed at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center on 138 patients who were taking a stable dose of amiodarone before and after an amiodarone generic product substitution.
RESULTS:
Seventy-seven patients had steady-state plasma concentrations documented for each product at the same dose. The mean steady-state plasma concentrations of amiodarone were not significantly different for Cordarone compared with Pacerone (1.07 ± 0.48 vs. 1.19 ± 0.66 μg/mL, respectively); similarly, the concentrations of the active metabolite (desethylamiodarone) did not differ (0.95 ± 0.30 vs. 0.96 ± 0.49 μg/mL, respectively). However, the variability in plasma drug concentrations between products was increased as compared to variability within each product.
CONCLUSIONS:
This study indicates that comparable steady-state concentrations can be achieved with a change in formulation from Cordarone to Pacerone. However, individual responses vary, suggesting that monitoring of plasma concentrations is prudent 1–3 months after any change from one product to another.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
