AdayA., BegleyC., LairsonD., BalkrishnanR.Evaluating the Healthcare System: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity.3rd ed.Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press; 2004.
2.
KaneR.Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research.Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 1997.
3.
MacKinnonG.Understanding Health Outcomes and Pharmacoeconomics.Subury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers;2013.
4.
DrummondM., SchwartsJ., JonssonB.Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care.2008; 24(3): 244–258.
NeumannP.Communicating and promoting comparative effectiveness research findings. New Engl J Med.2013; 369(3): 209–211.
7.
SchumockG., PickardA.Comparative effectiveness research: Relevance and applications to pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm.2009; 66(14): 1278–1286.
8.
PatelH., ToeD.C., BurkeS., RasuR.S.Anticonvulsant use after formulary status change for brand-name second-generation anticonvulsants. Am J Manag Care.2010; 16(8): e197–204.
9.
SullivanS.D., YeungK., VogelerC.Design, implementation, and first-year outcomes of a value-based drug formulary. J Manag Care Specialty Pharm.2015; 21(4): 269–275.
10.
IezzoniL.I.Reasons for risk adjustment. In: IezzoniL.I., ed. Risk Adjustment for Measuring Healthcare Outcomes.3rd ed.Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press; 2003.
11.
BergerM., MamdaniM., AtkinD., JohnsonM.Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part I, value in health.2009; 12(8): 1044–1052.