This paper examines and reviews the benefits, limitations and legal implications of guidelines formulated specifically for general dental practitioners. As more guidelines are developed and become more influential in the way dentists practise and become more accountable, it is of paramount importance that that they are scientifically valid, relevant to the practitioners who use them, and are rigorously evaluated before adoption.
A First Class Service: Quality in the New NHS.London: Department of Health; 1998.
2.
BatchelorP.The legal and ethical implication of evidence-based clinical guidelines for clinicians. Evidence-Based Dentistry2000;2:5–6.
3.
Modernising NHS Dentistry—Implementing the NHS Plan.London: Department of Health; 2000.
4.
Maintaining Standards.London: General Dental Council; 2001.
5.
Infection Control in Dentistry. [Advice sheet A12.] London: British Dental Association; 2003.
6.
Clinical Examination and Record-Keeping.London: Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK); 2001.
7.
GDC new guidelines for general anaesthesia.SAAD Dig1999;16:3–6.
8.
GDC new guidelines for sedation.SAAD Dig1999;16:17–9.
9.
RockWP.UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry. Extraction of primary teeth—balance and compensation.Int J Paediatr Dent2002;12:151–3.
10.
MartinMV, LongmanLP, PalmerNAO.Adult Antimicrobial Prescribing in Primary Care for General Dental Practitioners. London: Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK); 2000.
11.
National Clinical Guidelines.London: Faculty of Dental Surgery, The Royal College of Surgeons of England; 1997.
12.
Guidance to the NHS on the Removal of Wisdom Teeth.London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence; 2000.
13.
FieldM, LohrK.Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington: National Academy Press; 1990.
14.
BergM.Problems and promises of the protocol. Soc Sci Med1997;44:1081–8.
15.
GrimshawJ, RussellI.Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines. I: Developing scientifically valid guidelines.Qual Health Care1993;2:243–8.
16.
FreemantleN, WoodJ.Evaluating guidelines across primary care–secondary care interface. Methodological weaknesses and poor reporting undermine authors’ conclusions.BMJ2001;323:808.
17.
GrolR, DalhuijsenJ, ThomasS, VeldC, RuttenG, MokkinkH.Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ1998;317:858–61.
18.
NHS Dentistry: Options for Change.London: Department of Health; 2002.
19.
CluzeauFA, LittlejohnsP.Appraising clinical practice guidelines in England and Wales: the development of a methodologic framework and its application to policy. Jt Comm J Qual Improv1999;25:514–21.
20.
Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument.London: The AGREE Collaboration, 2001. Available from: URL: http//www.agreecollaboration.org
21.
GrilliR, MagriniN, PennaA, MuraG, LiberatiA.Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet2000;355:103–6.
22.
GrimshawJM, RussellIT.Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines. II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.Qual Health Care1994;3:45–52.
23.
GrolR.Development of guidelines for general practice care. Br J Gen Pract1993;43:146–51.
24.
McCombJL, WrightJL, O'BrienKD.Clinical guidelines for dentistry: will they be useful? Br Dent J1997;183:22–6.
25.
SackettDL.Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest1986;89(2 Suppl):2S–3S.
26.
MulrowCD.Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ1994;309:597–9.
27.
Acute Pain Management: Operative or Medical Procedures and Trauma. Publication no. AHCPR 92–0038. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Publications; 1992.
28.
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003. Oxford: Update Software.
29.
BaileyJ, GabbayM.Clinical practice guidelines and primary care. In: GabbayM, editor. Evidence-Based Primary Care Handbook. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 1999.
30.
HurwitzB.Clinical guidelines and the law: advice, guidance or regulation? J Eval Clin Pract1995;1:49–60.
31.
HurwitzB.Clinical guidelines: proliferation and medicolegal significance. Qual Health Care1994;3:37–44.
32.
Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee. All England Reports1957;2:118–22.
33.
Harpwood v. NHS reform, audit, protocols and standards of care. Med Law Int1994;1:241–59.
34.
SternK.Clinical guidelines and negligence liability. In: DeighanM, HitchS, editors. Clinical Effectiveness: From Guidelines to Cost Effective Practice. Bentwood: Early-brave; 1995: 127–35.
35.
HyamsAL, BrandenburgJA, LipsitzSR, ShapiroDW, BrennanTA.Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: a two-way street. Ann Intern Med1995;122:450–5.
36.
Vernon v. Bloomsbury Health Authority. Med Law Reports 1995;6:297–310.
