Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2002-4
The Use of Geographical Information Systems in Examining Variations in Sociodemographic Profiles of Dental Practice Catchments: A Case Study of a Swansea Practice
The aim of this paper is to use a case study approach to illustrate the potential for using geographical information systems (GIS) to examine the provision of dental services in the UK. A major benefit of using GIS to examine sociodemographic profiles of patients on a dental register is to inform policy makers.
Method
We illustrate the advantages of such an approach by using a post-coded list of registered patients for a dental practice in Swansea. To be of value in this context, the maintenance of up-to-date and fully postcoded information by practitioners is vital. We draw attention to the advantages (and current limitations) of using deprivation indices in conjunction with such lists.
Result
GIS has significant potential in analysing patterns of registration, and utilisation, of such services but, to date, there has been a relative dearth of studies that have developed such systems.
Conclusion
We conclude by drawing attention to wider benefits of such software tools in the dental profession and outline a research agenda to take these issues further.
Department of Health.Government Response to the House of Commons Select Committee on Health's Report on Access to NHS Dentistry. Cm 5145. London: Stationery Office, 2001.
2.
National Assembly for Wales.Improving Health in Wales: A Plan for the NHS with its Partners. Cardiff: NAFW, 2001.
3.
GatrellA, SeniorM.Health and health care applications. In: LongleyPA, MaguireDJ, GoodchildMF, RhindDW, editors. Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications. 2nd ed. London: Longman, 1999.
4.
HiggsG, GouldM.Is there a role for GIS in the ‘New NHS’? Health and Place2001;7:247–59.
5.
Environmental System Research Institute.Understanding GIS: The ARC/INFO Method. Redlands: ESRI, 1990.
6.
MartinD.Geographic Information Systems—Socio-economic Applications. London: Routledge, 1996.
7.
WhiteDA, AndersonRJ, BradnockG, GrayMM, JenkinsP.The use of a geographical information system in investigating dental services. Community Dent Health2000;17:79–84.
8.
EvansDJ.Geographical Information and mapping in dentistry: the Avon experience. Community Dent Health1991;8:291–2.
9.
TickleM, BlinkhornAS, BrownPJB, MatthewsR.A geodemographic analysis of the Denplan patient population in the North West Region. Br Dent J2000;189:494–9.
10.
EllwoodRP, O'MullaneDM.Identification of areas with high levels of untreated dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol1996;24:1–6.
11.
LockerD.Deprivation and oral health: a review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol2000;28:161–9.
12.
TickleM, KayE, WorthingtonH, BlinkhornA.Predicting population dental disease experience at a small area level using Census and health service data. J Public Health Med2000;22:368–74.
13.
TickleM, BrownP, BlinkhornA, JennerT.Comparing the ability of different area measures of socioeconomic status to segment a population according to caries prevalence. Community Dent Health,2000;17:138–44.
14.
TickleM, WilliamsM, JennerT, BlinkhornA.The effects of socioeconomic status and dental attendance on dental caries’ experience, and treatment patterns in 5-year-old children. Br Dent J1999;186:135–7.
15.
National Assembly for Wales.Registration of Patients with General Dental Practitioners in Wales. SDB 36/2001. Cardiff: NAFW, 2001.
16.
GatrellAC.On the spatial representation and accuracy of address-based data in the United Kingdom. Int J Geograph Information Systems1989;3:335–48.
Corporate Strategies Unit, Chief Executive's Department.The Price we Pay; A Poverty Profile of Swansea, 1997. Swansea: City and County of Swansea, 1997.
19.
TownsendP, PhillimoreP, BeattieA.Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North. London: Croom Helm, 1988.
20.
PrendergastMJ, BealJF, ClaytonJR.The use of sociodemographic profiling of patients to monitor changes in the provision of care by the Community Dental Service. Community Dent Health1999;16:213–5.
21.
National Statistics.Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation. Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales, 2000.
22.
National Assembly for Wales.Regenerating our most Disadvantaged Communities, ‘Communities First’. Second Consultation Paper—Proposals for Implementation. Cardiff: NAFW, 2000.
23.
WaltersNM, ZietsmanHL, BhagwandinN.The geographical distribution of diagnostic medical and dental x-ray services in South Africa. S Afr Med J1998;88:383–9.
24.
TickleM, JennerT, BlinkhornA.The utility of anony-mised postcoded registration data provided by the Dental Practice Board. Community Dent Health2000;17:254–6.
25.
LockerD, ClarkeM.Geographic variations in dental services provided to older adults in Ontario, Canada. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol1999;27:275–82.
26.
TickleM, MouldingG, MilsomK, BlinkhornA.Dental caries, contact with dental services and deprivation in young children: their relationship at a small area level. Br Dent J2000;189:376–9.
27.
TickleM, HayhurstG, MouldingG, JennerT, BlinkhornA.Matching Dental Practice Board data to the health authority population register. Community Dent Health2001;18:37–41.
28.
TickleM, MouldingG, MilsomK, BlinkhornA.Socio-economic and geographical influences on primary dental care preferences in a population of young children. Br Dent J2000;188:559–62.
29.
BealJF, JamesPMC.Social differences in the dental conditions and dental needs of 5-year-old children in four areas of the West Midlands. Br Dent J1970;129:313–18.
30.
TaylorPJ, CarmichaelCL.Dental health and the application of geographical methodology. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol1980;8:117–22.
