The introduction of the specialty of surgical dentistry is an advance in itself and has far-reaching implications for the future. Surgical specialists will have a significant impact on the provision and resources of surgical dental services. This paper explores recent developments within the field.
General Dental Council.Consultation Paper on Introduction of Specialist Titles and Specialist List. London: GDC, 1991.
2.
The General Dental Council (Distinctive Branches of Dentistry) Regulations.London: GDC, 1998.
3.
Faculty of Dental Surgery.Specialisation in Dentistry: A Practical Guide. London: FDS, The Royal College Surgeons of England, 1999.
4.
General Dental Council.The First Two Years— General Professional Training.London: GDC, 1998.
5.
Dental Practice Board.Annual Review 1998–99. Eastbourne: DPB, 1999.
6.
TullochJF, AntczakAA, WilkesJW.The application of decision analysis to evaluate the need for extraction of asymptomatic third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1987;45:855–65.
7.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence.Guidance on the Removal of Wisdom Teeth. Technology Appraisals Guidance No.1. London: NICE, 2000.
8.
MercierP, PreciousD.Risks and benefits of removal of impacted third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1992;21:17–27.
9.
ShepherdJ, BrickleyM.Surgical removal of third molars. BMJ1994;309:620–1.
10.
SongF, LandesDP, GlennyAM, SheldonTA.Prophylactic removal of impacted third molars: an assessment of published reviews. Br Dent J1997;182:339–46.
11.
FlickW.The third molar controversy: framing the controversy as a public health policy issue. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1999;57:438–44.
12.
GuralnickG, LaskinD.NIH consensus development conference for removal of third molars. J Oral Surg1980;38:235–6.
13.
American Association of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons.Report of a workshop on the management of patients with third molar teeth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1994;52:1102.
14.
American Association of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons. parameters of care for oral maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1995;53(suppl 5).
15.
WeilTM, AkersonHA, AllingCC, DavisWMJr.Parameters of care for oral and maxillo-facial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1995;53(suppl 5):31–59.
16.
Faculty of Dental Surgery, The Royal College of Surgeons of England.Management of Patients with Third Molar Teeth. Report of a working party. London: FDS, 1997.
17.
KugelbergCF, AhlstromU, EricsonS, HugosonA.Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A retrospective study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg1985;14:29–40.
18.
KugelbergCF.Periodontal healing two and four years after impacted lower third molar surgery. A comparative retrospective study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg1990;19:341–5.
19.
AshM, CostichER, Hayward. A study of periodontal hazards of third molars. J Periodontol1962;33:209–19.
20.
MarmaryY, BrayerL, TzukertA, FellerL.Aveolar bone repair following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg1986;60:324–6.
21.
WorralSF, RidenK, HaskellR, CorriganAM.UK national third molar project: the initial report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg1998;36:14–6.
22.
AbsiEC.ShepherdJP.A Comparison of morbidity following the removal of lower third methods. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg1993;22:149–53.
23.
HovellJH.Practical techniques in the removal of impacted teeth. Trans Int Conf Oral Surg1967:349–53.
24.
GreenwoodM.LangtonSG.RoodJP.A comparison of broad and narrow retractors for lingual nerve protection during lower third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg1994;34:114–7.
25.
MossCE, WakeMJC.Lingual access for third molar surgery: a 20-year retrospective audit. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg1999;37:255–8.
26.
WaltersH.Reducing lingual nerve damage in third molar surgery: a clinical audit of 1,350 cases. Br Dent J1995:178:474–5.
27.
RobinsonPP, SmithKG.Lingual nerve damage during lower third molar removal: a comparison of two surgical methods. Br Dent J1996;180:456–61.
28.
RudJ.The split bone technique for removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Surg1970;28:416–21.
29.
RoodJP.Lingual split technique. Damage to inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerves during removal of impacted third molars.Br Dent J1983;154:402–3.
30.
RoodJP.Permanent damage to inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during the removal of impacted wisdom teeth. Comparison of two methods of bone removal.Br Dent J1992;172:108–10.
31.
OsbornTP, FredericksonGJr, SmallIA, TorgersonTS.A prospective study of complications related to third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1985;43:767–9.
32.
GoldbergMH, NemarichAN, MarcoWP 2nd. Complications after mandibular third molar surgery: A statistical analysis of 500 consecutive procedures in private practice. J Am Dent Assoc1985;111:277–9.
33.
KaziroGSN.Metronidazole and arnica in the prevention of postsurgical complications, a comparative placebo controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg1984;22:42.
34.
MacGregorAJ, AddyA.Value of penicillin in the prevention of pain, swelling and trismus following the removal of ectopic mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Surg1980;9:166–72.
35.
HapponenRP, BackstromAC, YlipaavalniemiP.Prophylactic use of phenoxymethylpenicillin and tinidazole in mandibular third molar surgery, a comparative placebo controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg1990;28:12–5.
36.
CurranJB, KennettS, YoungAR.An assessment of the use of prophylactic antibiotics in third molar surgery. Int J Oral Surg1974;3:1–6.
37.
MitchellDA.A controlled clinical trial of prophylactic tinidazole for chemoprophylaxis in third molar surgery. Br Dent J1986;160:284–6.
38.
McHenryMC, WeinsteinAJ.Antimicrobial drugs and infections in ambulatory patients: some problems and perspectives. Med Clin North Am1983;67:3–16.
39.
CohenS, BurnsRC.Pathways of the Pulp. St Louis: Mosby, 1998:617.
40.
LinLM, SkribnerJE, GaenglerP.Factors associated with endodontic treatment failures. J Endod1992;18:625–7.
HartyF, ParkinsBJ, WengrafAM.Success rate in root canal therapy: a retrospective study of conventional cases. Br Dent J1970;407:65–71.
43.
GutmannJL.Surgical procedures in endodontic practice. In: Levine N, editor. Current Treatment in Dental Practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1986.
44.
GrungB, MolvenO, HalseA.Periapical surgery in a Norwegian county hospital: Follow-up findings of 447 teeth. J Endod1990;16:391–3.
45.
SjogrenU, HagglundB, SundqvistG, WingK.Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod1990;16:498–504.
46.
CarrGB.Common errors in periradicular surgery. Endod Rep1993;8:12–8.
47.
CohenS, BurnsRC.Pathways of the Pulp. St Louis: Mosby, 1998:791.
48.
CarrGB.Ultrasonic root-end preparation. Dent Clin North Am1997;41:541–54.
49.
CarrGB.Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc1992;20:55–61.
50.
OynickJ, OynickT.A study of a new material for retrograde fillings. J Endod1978;4:203–6.
51.
DornSO, GartnerAH.Retrogrde filling materials: A retrospective success-failure study of amalgam, EBA and IRM. J Endod1990;16:391–3.
52.
TorabinejadM, HongCU, McdonaldF, PittFord TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod1995;21:349–53.
53.
TorabinejadM, HongCU, PittFord TR, KetteringJD.Cytotoxicity of four root end filling materials. J Endod1995;21:489–92.
54.
TorabinejadMT, HigaRK, MckendryDJ, PittFord TR. Dye leakage of four root end filling materials: effects of blood contamination. J Endod1994;20:159–63.
55.
TorabinejadM, SmithPW, KetteringJD, PittFord TR. Comparative investigation of marginal adaptation of MTA and other commonly used root-end filling materials, J Endod1995;21:295–9.
56.
TorabinejadM, HongCU, LeeSJ, MonsefM, PittFord TR. Investigation of mineral trioxide aggregate for root-end fillings in dogs. J Endod1995;21:603–8.
57.
WilliamsSS, GuttmannJL.Periradicular healing in response to Diaket root-end filling material with and without tricalcium phophate. Int Endod J1996;29:84–92.
58.
ReganJD, GutmannJL, IapopinoAM, DiekwischT.Response of periradicular tissues to growth factors introduced into the surgical site in the root-end filling material. Int Endod J1999;32:171–82.
