Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study explored the feasibility of a Composite Drinking Scale (CDS) designed to capture fully the phenomenon of problem drinking among college students while allowing easy public understanding. A survey conducted at 32 four-year U.S. colleges included four consumption measures: 30-day frequency; average number of drinks per week; number of drinks usually consumed when partying; and greatest number of drinks in one sitting in the past two weeks. Responses were normalized and added to create a continuous distribution, which was then subdivided into quartiles (CDS/Q1-Q4). The CDS is an easily understood scoring system, but compared to the simplistic “binge drinking” measure, it captures a broader range of relative risks and more clearly establishes the quadratic relationship between consumption and alcohol-related problems. Development of the CDS will require further exploring the best set of questions to include, establishing U.S. norms for the general population, and then transforming those scores to a simple measurement yardstick whose meaning can be easily communicated to the public.

Keywords

Alcohol consumption measurement psychometric properties college student

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

J P

and Wilson

V B

. 2003. Assessing Alcohol Problems: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers, 2nd ed., Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

O'Malley

P M

and Johnston

L D

. 2002. Epidemiology of alcohol and other drug use among American college students. J Stud Alcohol, S14: 23–39.

Wechsler

and Austin

S B

. 1998. Binge drinking: The five/four measure. J Stud Alcohol, 59: 122–123.

Flegal

K M

. 1990. Agreement between two dietary methods in the measurement of consumption. J Stud Alcohol, 51: 408–414.

Redman

, Sanson-Fisher

R W

, Wilkinson

, Fahey

P P

and Gibberd

R W

. 1987. Agreement between two measures of alcohol consumption. J Stud Alcohol, 48: 104–108.

Ellickson

P L

, McGuigan

K A

, Adams

, Bell

R M

and Hays

R D

. 1996. Teenagers and alcohol misuse in the United States: By any definition, it's a big problem. Addiction, 91: 1489–1503.

Dimeff

L A

, Baer

J S

, Kivlhan

D R

and Marlatt

G A

. 1999. Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS): A Harm Reduction Approach, New York: Guildford.

Fitzgerald

J L

and Mulford

1987. Self-report validity issues. J Stud Alcohol, 48: 207–211.

DeJong

2001. Finding common ground for effective campus-based prevention. Psychol Addict Behav, 15: 292–296.

10.

Perkins

H W

. 2003. The Social Norms Approach to Preventing School and College Age Substance Abuse: A Handbook for Educators, Counselors, and Clinicians, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Cronbach

L J.

1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16: 297–334.

12.

Wechsler

, Davenport

, Dowdall

, Moeykens

and Castillo

1994. Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college: A national survey of students at 140 campuses. JAMA, 272: 1672–1677.

13.

Edwards

, Roberts

, Clarke

, DiGuiseppi

, Pratap

, Wentz

and Kwan

2002. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: Systematic review. BMJ, 324: 1183–1191.

14.

SAS. 2001. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Version 8.2, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

15.

Wechsler

1996. Alcohol and the American college campus: A report from the Harvard School of Public Health. Change, : 20–25. 60 July/August

16.

Gruenewald

P J

, Mitchell

P R

and Treno

A J

. 1996. Drinking and driving: Drinking patterns and drinking problems. Addiction, 91: 1637–1649.

17.

Gruenewald

P J

and Nephew

1994. Drinking in California: Theoretical and empirical analyses of alcohol consumption patterns. Addiction, 89: 707–723.

Measuring College Student Drinking

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References