The problem of interest is the collision between the wing of the aircraft and the WTC columns. This is quantified in two ways: by an analytical method and by FEA simulation. The first involved simple static and somewhat more complex dynamic patterns. The FEA approach used moderate size models, which had some features not employed before. The real question behind this work was if a significant amount of fuel was necessary in the wing to make it cut the columns. The question is answered by conducting the analyses for the outboard part of the wing that had rather thin skin, 4 and 2 mm respectively and negligible fuel content.
NIST NCSTAR 1–2B.Analysis of Aircraft Impact into WTC Towers. KirkpatrickS.W., NIST, New York, September 2005.
2.
KindervaterC.M.Crash Simulation Methodologies for Aircraft Structures Used within European Crashworthiness Research. International Aircraft Fire and Safety Research Conference, Atlantic City, New Jersey, November 1998.
3.
WierzbickiT. and TengX.How the airplane wing cut through the exterior columns of the World Trade Center. International Journal of Impact Engineering28 (2003) 601–625.
4.
KarimM.R. and FattSoo M.S.Impact of the Boeing 767 Aircraft into the World Trade Center. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 131, No. 10, October 1, 2005.
5.
NIST NCSTAR 1–1A.Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster. Designand Constructionof Structural SystemsFanellaD.A.. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)New York, September 2005.
6.
NIST NCSTAR 1–1B.Comparison of Building Code Structural Requirements. GhoshS.K., NIST, New York, September 2005.
7.
NIST NCSTAR 1–2A.Reference Structural Models and Baseline Performance Analysis of WTC Towers. FashanW.J., NIST, New York, September 2005.
8.
NIST NCSTAR 1–3C.Appendix A. Examples of Perimeter Panel Floor Truss Connectors. NIST, New York, September 2005.
9.
NIST NCSTAR 1–3D.Mechanical Properties of Structural SteelsLueckeW.E., NIST, New York, September 2005.
10.
NIST NCSTAR 1–5.Reconstruction of the Fires in WTC Towers. GannR.G., NIST, New York, September 2005.
11.
NIST NCSTAR 1–6B.Fire Resistance Tests of Floor Truss Systems. GrossJ., NIST, New York, September 2005.
12.
NIST NCSTAR 1–6C.Component, Connection and Subsystem Structural Analysis. ZarghameeM.S., NIST, New York, September 2005.
13.
NIST NCSTAR 1–6D.Global Structural Analysis of the Response of the WTC Towers to Impact Damage and Fire. ZarghameeM.S., NIST, New York, September 2005.
14.
ZhangC.BiniendaW.K.HorvatF.E.WangW.Application of Numerical Methods for Crashworthiness Investigation of a Large Aircraft Wing Impact with a Tree. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences, MCFNS5(1):71(85), 2013.
15.
United States DOT/FAA.Crash Simulation of Transport Aircraft for Predicting Fuel Release. First Phase. Lockheed Constellation Model L-1649 Full Scale Crash Test., 2012.
16.
Szuladziński, G.Collision of steel post with aircraft wing. Technical Note No. 102. Website: www.simulate-events.com, Analytical Service Pty Ltd, 1/2014.
17.
NonakaT.Shear and bending response of a rigid-plastic beam to blast-type loading. Ingenieur-Archiv46, Springer-Verlag, 1977.
18.
SzuladzińskiG.Response of Beams to Shock Loading: Inelastic Range. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 133, No. 3, March 2007.
19.
SzuladzińskiG.Transient beam response due to point load impact and determination of onset of yielding in bending. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, Vol. 140, No. 1, Jan 1, 2014, ISSN 0733-9399/2014/1-0001-0004 (Technical Note)
20.
SzuladzińskiG.Formulas for mechanical and structural shock and impact. CRC Press, 2009.
21.
US Dept. of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.Experimental investigation of material models for Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and 2024-T3 Aluminum. Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-00/25. Washington DC, September 2000.
22.
WierzbickiT.Concertina tearing of metal plates. Int J Solids Struct1995; 32(19):2923–43.
23.
GoldsmithW.Impact. Edward Arnold Ltd, London, 1960.
CowperG.R. and SymondsP.S. (1957) Strain hardening and strain-rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams. Brown University Division of Applied Mathematics, Report No. 28.
26.
BruhnE.F.Analysis And Design Of Flight Vehicle Structures. S.R. Jacobs and Associates, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1973.
