The aim of this work is to develop a CFD model taking into account the processes of condensation and evaporation in moist air powered ejectors. The study is realized with the CFD software Ansys-Fluent in which a 2D axisymmetric model of non-equilibrium condensation in high speed flow was implemented. Validation of the computational results is carried out using flow visualization. The evolution of the basic parameters characterizing the droplet condensation process is studied numerically along the ejector axis. The effects of some parameters (such as primary stagnation pressure and humidity rate present in the primary and secondary air flows) are also examined. Limitations of the present numerical model are discussed.
AbrahamF.F., Homogeneous Nucleation Theory. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
2.
Al-AnsaryH.A.M. and JeterS.M., Numerical and experimental analysis of single-phase and two-phase flow in ejectors, HVAC & R Research, 10, 2004, 521–538.
3.
BartosiewiczY.AidounZ. and MercadierY., Numerical assessment of ejector operation for refrigeration applications based on CFD, Applied Thermal Engineering, 26, 2006, 604–612.
4.
DesevauxP., Formation of nanodroplets in an air-induced ejector: A qualitative study by flow visualization, CJChE, 79, 2001, 273–278.
5.
DesevauxP. and LanzettaF., Computational fluid dynamic modelling of pseudo-shock inside a zero-secondary flow ejector, AIAA Journal, 42, 2004, 1480–1483.
6.
DesevauxP.MarynowskiT. and KhanM., CFD prediction of supersonic ejectors performance, International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines, 23, 2006, 173–181.
7.
DesevauxP.PrenelJ.P. and HostacheG., Flow visualization methods for investigating an induced flow ejector, Journal of Flow Visualization and Image Processing, 2, 1995, 61–74.
8.
HemidiA.HenryF.LeclaireS.SeynhaeveJ.M.BartosiewiczY.CFD analysis of a supersonic air ejector: Part 1 – Experimental validation of single-phase and two-phase operation, Applied Thermal Engineering, 29, 2009, 1523–1531.
9.
HillP.G., Condensation of water vapour during supersonic expansion in nozzles, J. Fluid Mech., 25, 1966, 593–620.
10.
KotakeS. and GlassI.I., Flows with nucleation and condensation, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 19, 1981, 129–196.
11.
LamannaG., On nucleation and droplet growth in condensing nozzle flows, PhD Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2000.
12.
LuitjenC.C.M.PeetersP. and Van DongenM.E.H., Nucleation at high pressure: II – Wave tube data and analysis, J. of Chemical Physics, 111, 1999, 8535–8544.
13.
MarynowskiT.MercadierY. and DesevauxP., Characterization of geometric parameters impact on ejector performance. 13th International Heat Transfer Conference, Sydney, Australia, 2006.
14.
RiffatS.B.JiangL. and GanG., Recent development in ejector technology: A review, International Journal of Ambient Energy, 26, 2005, 13–26.
15.
SriveerakulT.AphornratanaS. and ChunnanondK., Performance prediction of steam ejector using computational fluid dynamics: Part 1 – Validation of the CFD results, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 46, 2006a, 812–822.
16.
SriveerakulT.AphornratanaS. and ChunnanondK., Performance prediction of steam ejector using computational fluid dynamics: Part 2 – Flow structure of a steam ejector influenced by operating pressures and geometries, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 46, 2006b, 823–833.
