This case study assessed the efficacy of a constructivist development approach and subsequent action research methodology during sport-science support to an international shooting team (n=14) over a two-year period. Specific analysis focused on the benefits of a coach-focussed program to integrate the pluralism associated with the development of sporting expertise. The broadest possible range of methods and tools were utilised to ensure a multi-level awareness of change was provided This required monitoring and controlling change in organisational, team, relational and individual behaviour. Findings revealed that an emergenic, iterative, ecological and meta-level process of coaching and sport-science support was conducive to the needs of this particular squad due to the nesting and multi-dimensional issues related to performance behaviours within intra-personal, inter-personal, group and social domains, and the rich-interconnectedness associated with the relevant domains of expertise. Furthermore, the constructivist, coach-focussed program within the project was endorsed.
SimontonD.K., Talent and Its Development: An Emergenic and Epigenetic Model, Psychological Review, 1999, 106, 435–457.
2.
SimontonD.K., Creative Development as Acquired Expertise: Theoretical Issues and an Empirical Test, Developmental Review, 2000, 20, 283–318.
3.
OllisS.MacphersonA.CollinsD., Expertise and Talent Development in Rugby Refereeing: An Ethnographic Enquiry, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2006, 24, 309–322.
4.
BakerJ.HortonS.Robertson-WilsonJ.WallM., Nurturing Sport Expertise: Factors Influencing the Development of Elite Athletes, Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2003, 2, 1–9.
5.
ZimmermanB.J., Development and Adaptation of Expertise, in: EricssonK.A.CharnessN.FeltovichP.J.HoffmanR.R. eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006, 705–722.
6.
SchemppP.G.McCullickB.A.BuschC.A.WebsterC.MasonI.S., (2006). The Self-Monitoring of Expert Sport Instructors, International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 2006, 1, 25–35.
7.
SchönD., Educating the Reflective Practitioner, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 1987.
8.
MascoloM.F.FischerK.W., Constructivist Theories, in: HopkinsB.BarrR.G.MichelG.F.RochatP. eds., The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Development, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005, 49–73.
9.
SawyerR.K., The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006.
10.
MahoneyM.J., Constructivism and Positive Psychology, in: SnyderC.R.LopezS.J. eds., Handbook of Positive Psychology, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002, 745–750.
11.
KozulinA.GindisB.AgeyevV.S.MillerS.M., Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003.
12.
ReasonP.BradburyH., Handbook of Action Research, Sage, London, 2001.
13.
LewinK., Frontiers in Group Dynamics, in: CartwrightD. ed., Field Theory in Social Science, Social Science Paperbacks, London, 1947, 5–41.
14.
McKieL., Engagement and Evaluation in Qualitative Enquiry, in: MayT. ed., Qualitative Research in Action, Sage, London, 2002, 261–285.
15.
HartE.BondM., Action Research for Health and Social Care, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 1995.
16.
EvansL.HardyL.FlemingS., Intervention Strategies With Injured Athletes: An Action Research Study, The Sport Psychologist, 2000, 14, 188–206.
17.
GilbourneD., Searching for the Nature of Action Research: A Response to Evans, Hardy and Fleming, The Sport Psychologist, 2000, 14, 207–214.
18.
OllisS., IAEEE and Critical Transitions in Refereeing Development, Unpublished Masters Dissertation, Faculty of Education, University of Edinburgh, 2003.
19.
AbbottA.ButtonC.PeppingG.-J.CollinsD., Unnatural Selection: Talent Identification and Development in Sport, Non-linear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 2005, 9, 61–88.
20.
AbbottA.CollinsD., Eliminating the Dichotomy Between Theory and Practice in Talent Identification and Development: Considering the Role of Psychology, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2004, 22, 395–408.
21.
GranottN.ParzialleJ., Microdevelopment: Transition Processes in Development and Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
22.
GuadagnoliM.A.LeeT.D., Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning, Journal of Motor Behaviour, 2004, 36, 212–224.
23.
EganG., The Skilled Helper, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 2002.
BronfenbrennerU., The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1979.
26.
BronfenbrennerU., Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development, Sage Publications, London, 2005.
27.
YardleyL., Dilemmas in Qualitative Health Research, Psychology and Health, 15, 215–218, 2000.
28.
CrossN.LyleJ., The Coaching Process, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1999.
29.
McClureB.A., Putting a New Spin on Groups: The Science of Chaos, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 2005.
30.
ZolloM.GrinterS.G., Deliberate Learning and Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities, Organization Science, 2002, 13, 339–351.
31.
GuastelloS. J., Managing Emergent Phenomena: Nonlinear Dynamics in Work Organizations, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, New Jersey, 2002.
32.
FineM.TorreM.E.BoudinK., Participatory Action Research: From Within and Beyond Prison Bars, in: CamicP.M.RhodesJ.E.YardleyL. eds., Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 2003, 173–198.
