Many efforts to use the social sciences for the purpose of change and reconstruction have their roots in the idea of the field experiment. In various forms, the field experiment played a dominant role in the period 1930-1970. In more recent years, new patterns have emerged, such as complementary research roles in network building. In this contribution, focus is on the links between the early experiments and today's approaches, to see the latter in terms of responses to the challenges posed by the processes that were triggered off by the field experiments.
APEL, K.-O.Transformation der philosophie: Des apriori der kommunikationsgemeinschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973.
2.
BOLWEG, J. F.Job design and industrial democracy: The case of Norway. Leiden: Nijhoff, 1976.
3.
COCH, L., & FRENCH, J. R. P, Jr.Overcoming resistance to change. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory. London: Tavistock Publications, 1953.
4.
EIJNATTEN, F, VAN. The paradigm that changed the workplace. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum, 1993.
5.
EKMAN PHILIPS, M., & REHNSTROM, K.Workplace development, gender and communicative competence. In S. Toulmin and B. Gustavsen (Eds.), Beyond theory: Changing organisations through participation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996.
6.
EMERY, F. E.Systems thinking. Penguin Books, 1981.
7.
EMERY, F. E., & OESER, O. A.Information, decision and action. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
8.
EMERY, F. E., & THORSRUD, E.Democracy at work. Leiden: Nijhoff, 1976.
9.
EMERY, M. (Ed.). Participative design for participative democracy. Canberra: Center for Continuing Education, The Australian National University, 1989.
10.
ENGELSTAD, P. H.Developments in a national strategy of democratizing the work organization. In K. Trebesch (Ed.), Organization development in Europe: VoL I: Concepts. Bern: Paul Haupt Verlag, 1980.
11.
ENGELSTAD, P. H.The development organisation as communicative instrumentation: Experiences from the Karlstad programme. In S. Toulmin and B. Gustavsen (Eds.), Beyond theory: Changing organisations through participation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996.
12.
ENGELSTAD, P. H., & GUSTAVSEN, B.A Swedish network development for implementing a national work reform strategy. Human Relations, 1993, 46, 291-308.
13.
ENGELSTAD, P. H., & ODEGAARD, L. A.Participative redesign projects in Norway: Summarizing the first five years of a strategy to democratize the design process in work organization. In The Quality of Working Life Council (Eds.), Working with the quality of workinglife.Leiden: Nijhoff, 1979.
14.
ERIKSSON, K., & HAUGER, M.Workplace development and research: Two examples. In S. Toulmin and B. Gustavsen (Eds.), Beyond theory: Changing organizations through participation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996.
15.
FRENCH, J. R. P, Jr., ISRAEL, J., & AS, D.An experiment on participation in a Norwegian factory. Human Relations, 1960, 13(1), 3-19.
16.
GIDDENS, A.The consequences of modernity. Oxford: Polity Press, 1990.
17.
GILLESPIE, R.Manufacturing knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
18.
GUSTAVSEN, B. Aktionsforskning Rapporter, nr. 13. Psykologiska Institutionen, Stockholms Universitet, 1976.
19.
GUSTAVSEN, B.Technology and collective agreements. Some recent Scandinavian developments. Industrial Relations Journal, 1985, 16(3), 34-42.
20.
GUSTAVSEN, B.Dialogue and development. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum, 1992.
21.
GUSTAVSEN, B.Creating productive structures: The role of research and development. In F. Naschold, R. E. Cole, B. Gustavsen, and H. van Beinum (Eds.), Constructing the new industrial society. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum, 1993.
22.
GUSTAVSEN, B.Action research and the social sciences-An uneasy relationship. In S. Toulmin and B. Gustavsen (Eds.), Beyond theory: Changing organisations through participation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996.
23.
GUSTAVSEN, B., & ENGELSTAD, P. H.The design of conferences and the evolving role of democratic dialogue in changing working life. Human Relations, 1986, 39(2), 101-116.
24.
GUSTAVSEN, B., & HUNNIUS, G.New patterns of work reform: The case of Norway. Oslo: The University Press, 1981.
25.
HABERMAS, J.The theory of communicative action (Vol. I-II). London: Polity Press, 1984/87.
26.
HERBST, P. G.Alternatives to hierarchies. Leiden: Nijhoff, 1976.
27.
LEWIN, K.Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the National Research Council, 1943, CVIII, 35-65.
28.
LEWIN, K., LIPPITT, R., & WHITE, R. K.Patterns of aggressive behaviour in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 1939, 10, 271-299.
29.
McCARTHY, T.Pragmatizing communicative reason. In S. Toulmin and B. Gustavsen (Eds.), Beyond theory: Changing organizations through participation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996.
30.
NILSSON, K, & NILSSON, B. Hotell och Restaurang mot ar 2000-Projektbeskrivning for Regional Branchutveckling. Delrapport 2. Foretagsekonomiska Institutionen, UmeA Universitet, Umea, 1990.
31.
PALSHAUGEN, 0. Wie kann eine aktionsforschungsstrategie in die praxis umgesetzt werden? Ein beispiel aus der Norwegischen automobilbranche. In W Fricke and F. Jager (Eds.), Sozialwissenshaften und industrielle demokratie. Bonn: Neue Gesellschaft, 1988.
32.
PIORE, M., & SABEL, C. F.The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books, 1984.
33.
QVALE, T. U.A Norwegian strategy for democratization of industry. Human Relations, 1976, 29(5), 453-469.
