Autonomy supportive (rather than controlling) coaching has been shown to be important for motivating athletes and for boosting their performance. However, is this especially true for elite-level athletes, who presumably face greater stress and performance pressure? To address this question we surveyed 264 student athletes (141 recreational, 83 club sport, and 40 varsity) playing on sports teams at a U.S. public university. As expected, varsity athletes were higher than the other groups in external reward motivation and lower in intrinsic motivation. Consistent with past self-determination theory findings, coach's autonomy supportive behavior predicted intrinsic and identified motivation in all athletes, and also positive appraisals of the team experience. Most importantly, coach's autonomy support was a significantly stronger predictor of these outcomes in the varsity compared to the recreational and club groups. These findings suggest that elite-level coaches should make special efforts to be autonomy supportive (rather than controlling) with their athletes.
AndersenM. B., Working With College Student-Athletes, inVanRalte J.L.BrewerB.W. eds., Exploring Sport and Exercise Psychology, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1996, 317–334.
2.
ChatzisarantisN. L.HaggerM. S., The Moral Worth of Sport Reconsidered: Contributions of Recreational Sport and Competitive Sport to Life Aspirations and Psychological Well-Being, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2007, 25, 1047–1056.
3.
LonsdaleC.HodgeK.RoseE., Athlete Burnout in Elite Sport: A Self-Determination Perspective, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2009, 27, 785–795.
4.
WittmerJ.BosticD.PhillipsT.WatersW., The Personal, Academic, and Career Problems of College Student Athletes: Some Possible Questions, Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1981, 60, 52–55.
5.
PinkneyJ. W., Student-Athletes and Time Management for Studying, inEtzelE.F.FerranteA.P.PinkneyJ.W. eds., Counseling College Student Athletes: Issues and Interventions, Fitness Information Technology, Morganton WV, 1991, 121–134.
6.
ScalesJ.African-American Student Athletes: An Example of Minority Exploitation in Collegiate Athletics, in: EtzeE.F.FerranteA.P.PinkneyJ.W. eds., Counseling College Student Athletes: Issues and Interventions, Fitness Information Technology, Morganton WV, 1991, 71–99.
7.
ÁlvarezM. S.BalaguerI.CastilloI.DudaJ. L., Coach Autonomy Support and Quality of Sport Engagement in Young Soccer Players, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2009, 12, 138–148.
8.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L., Active Human Nature: Self-Determination Theory and the Promotion and Maintenance of Sport, Exercise, and Health, inHaggerM.S.ChatzisarantisN.L.D. eds., Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Exercise and Sport, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 2007, 1–19.
9.
MageauG. A.VallerandR. J., The Coach-Athlete Relationship: A Motivational Model, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2003, 21, 881–954.
10.
RaglinJ. S.TurnerP. E., Anxiety and Performance in Track and Field Athletes: A Comparison of the Inverted-U Hypothesis with Zone of Optimal Function Theory, Personality and Individual Differences, 1993, 14, 163–171.
11.
LordT. R.GarrisonJ., Comparing Spatial Abilities of Collegiate Athletes in Different Sports, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1998, 86, 1016–1018.
12.
PedersonD. M.ManningC. L., A Cross-Sport Athletic Performance Rating Scale, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2003, 97, 1128–1132.
13.
Holm-DenomaJ. M.ScaringiV.GordonK. H.Van OrdenK. A.JoinerT. E., Eating Disorder Symptoms Among Undergraduate Varsity Athletes, Club Athletes, Independent Exercisers, and Non-Exercisers, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2009, 42, 47–53.
14.
MartindaleE.DevlinS.VyseS. A., Participation in College Sports: Motivational Differences, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1990, 71, 1139–1150.
15.
CohenS., Psychosocial Models of the Role of Social Support in the Etiology of Physical Disease, Health Psychology, 1988, 7, 269–297.
16.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M., Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, Plenum, New York, 1985.
17.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M., The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 2000, 11, 227–268.
18.
SheldonK. M.WilliamsG.JoinerT., Self-Determination Theory in the Clinic: Motivating Physical and Mental Health, Yale University Press, New Haven CT, 2003.
19.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L., Self-Determination Theory and the Role of Basic Psychological Needs in Personality and the Organization of Behavior, inJohnO.RobinsR.W.PervinL.A. eds., Handbook of Personality Psychology: Theory and Research, Guilford Press, New York, 2008, 654–678.
20.
DeciE. L.KoestnerR.RyanR. M., A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125, 627–668.
21.
CianiK. D.MiddletonM. J.SummersJ. J.SheldonK. M., Buffering Against Performance Classroom Goal Structures: The Importance of Autonomy Support and Classroom Community, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2010, 35, 88–99.
22.
AmoroseA. J.Anderson-ButcherD., Autonomy Supportive Coaching and Self-Determined Motivation in High School and College Athletes: A Test of Self-Determination Theory, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2007, 8, 654–670.
23.
ReesT.HardyL., Matching Social Support With Stressors: Effects on Factors Underlying Performance in Tennis, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2004, 5, 319–337.
24.
BlackA. E.DeciE. L., The Effects of Instructors' Autonomy Support and Students' Autonomous Motivation on Learning Organic Chemistry: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective, Science Education, 2000, 84, 740–756.
25.
TaylorI. M.NtoumanisN.SmithB., The Social Context as a Determinant of Teacher Motivational Strategies in Physical Education, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2009, 10, 235–243.
26.
NgF.Kenney-BensonG.PomerantzE. A., Children's Achievement Moderates the Effects of Mother's Use of Control and Autonomy Support, Child Development, 2004, 75, 764–780.
27.
PomerantzE. A.WangQ.NgF., The Role of Children's Competence Experiences in the Socialization Process: A Dynamic Process Framework for the Academic Arena, Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 2005, 33, 193–227.
28.
HamreB. K.PiantaR. C., Can Instructional and Emotional Support in the First-Grade Classroom Make a Difference for Children at Risk of School Failure?, Child Development, 2005, 76, 949–967.
29.
GrolnickW. S.RyanR. M., Autonomy in Children's Learning: An Experimental and Individual Difference Investigation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52, 143–154.
30.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN.CulverhouseT.BiddleS. J. H., The Processes By Which Perceived Autonomy Support in Physical Education Promotes Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intentions and Behaviour: A Trans-Contextual Model, Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, 95, 784–795.
31.
PelletierL. G.FortierM. S.VallerandR. J.TusonK. M., Toward a New Measure of Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Amotivation in Sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS), Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1995, 17, 35–53.
32.
MartensM. P.WebberS. N., Psychometric Properties of the Sport Motivation Scale: An Evaluation With College Varsity Athletes From the U.S., Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2002, 24, 254–270.
33.
MallettC.KawabataM.NewcombeP.Otero-ForeroA.JacksonS., Sport Motivation Scale-6 (SMS-6): A Revised Six-Factor Sport Motivation Scale, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2007, 8, 600–614.
34.
BaronR.KennyD., The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction In Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 1173–1182.
35.
SobelM. E., Asymptotic Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equations Models, inLeinhartS. ed., Sociological Methodology 1982, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA, 1982, 290–312.
