Seismic Response of a Non-Concentric Rolling Isolator System

Abstract

Suspending a structure in the form of a pendulum would provide excellent protection from seismic ground motion, but is impractical for structures of any significance. The effect can be replicated in other ways, such as by placing the supports on shallow spherical dishes (the so-called friction pendulum), or by means of shaped, non-circular rollers placed between a building and its foundations. This paper investigates the dynamic response of structures resting on seismic isolators consisting of rollers with non-concentric, spherical upper and lower surfaces. The governing equations are developed, revealing a softening system with a period that is independent of mass. Expressions for period and stiffness as nonlinear functions of displacement are developed along with linear approximations. The roller element is then incorporated into a nonlinear time-history integration algorithm which is used to compare the response of an example structure on rolling isolators with a structure on conventional constant stiffness isolators. Peak acceleration response is significantly reduced, especially for high intensity earthquakes, with smaller reductions in peak displacement.

Keywords

structural dynamics seismic isolation near-fault earthquakes damping rolling isolators spectra numerical integration time-history return period

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almazán

J.L.

De La Llera

J.C.

Inaudi

J.A.

(1998). “Modelling aspects of structures isolated with the frictional pendulum system”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 27, pp. 845–867.

Aslam

Scalise

D. T.

, and Godden

W. G.

(1980). “Earthquake rocking response of rigid bodies”, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 106, No. 2, pp. 377–392.

Buckle

I. G.

and Mayes

R. L.

(1990). “Seismic isolation: History, application and performance – a world view”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 161–201.

Chang

S.Y.

(2002). “Explicit pseudodynamic algorithm with unconditional stability”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 128, No. 9, pp. 935–947.

Cherepinskiy

(2004). Triple-C Construction, Brookmount Ave., Coquitlam BC, Canada.

Chopra

A.K.

(1995). Dynamics of Structures, Prentice Hall.

Housner

G. W.

(1963). “The behaviour of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes”, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 404–417.

Jangid

R.S.

and Londhe

Y.B.

(1996). “Effectiveness of elliptical rolling rods for base isolation”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 124, No. 4, pp. 469–472.

Kelly

J.M.

(1999). “The role of damping in seismic isolation”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, pp. 3–20.

10.

Lin

T-W.

and Hone

C.C.

(1993). “Base isolation by free rolling rods under basement”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 22, pp. 261–273.

11.

MATLAB Version 6, Release 13. (2002). The Language of Technical Computing, The Mathworks Inc.

12.

Murnal

and Sinha

(2004). “Earthquake resistant design of structures using the variable frequency pendulum isolator”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 128, No. 7, pp. 870–880.

13.

Narita

Kojima

Kuramochi

Toriya

Kitayama

Kuramochi

and Ohtsuka

(2000). “Evaluation of performance of multi-suspended pendulum isolation (MSI) system with spatial truss structure”, Proceedings of the 12^th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January.

14.

NZS 1170.5 (2004). Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake Actions, New Zealand Standard.

15.

Priestley

M. J. N.

Evison

R. J.

and Carr

A. J.

(1978). “Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundation”, Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 141–150.