Horsetail Creek Bridge: Design Method Calibration and Experimental Results of Structural Strengthening with CFRP and GFRP Laminates

Abstract

The Horsetail Creek Bridge, constructed in 1912, is located along the Historic Columbia River Highway in Oregon. In a recent rating of bridges, the cross beams of the structure were found to be 50 percent deficient in flexure and 94 percent deficient in shear, mainly due to the traffic loads increase. In order to identify suitable Fiber Reinforced Polymer strengthening system, few commercially available systems were reviewed and alternative designs were carried on. Concurrently, four full size beams were constructed to simulate the retrofit of the bridge. One served as a control, while the other three were reinforced with various configurations of FRP composites. Third point bending tests were conducted. Load, deflection and strain data were collected. Results revealed that addition of either GFRP or CFRP composites provided static capacity increase of 45 percent compared to the control beam. The beam strengthened with CFRP for flexure and GFRP for shear, which simulated the HCB cross beams after the retrofit, exhibited near 100 percent of moment capacity increase. The addition of GFRP for shear alone was sufficient to offset the lack of steel stirrups in the actual bridge, allowing for a conventionally reinforced concrete beam with significant shear deficiency to fail by yielding of the flexural failure. The resulting ultimate deflections of the shear GFRP reinforced beam were nearly twice those of the control shear deficient beam. A design method for flexure and shear was proposed before the onset of this experimental study and used on the HCB. The design procedure for flexure was refined to include provisions for non-crushing failure modes. It allowed for predicting the response of the beam at any applied moment.

Keywords

strengthening of bridges testing of full-size RC beams composites CFRP GFRP design with FRP

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AASHTO Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures (1994). “Manual for condition evaluation of bridge”, American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.

AASHTO Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures (1996). “Standard specifications for highway bridges”, Including up to 1999 Interim Revisions, American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.

Arduini

D'Ambrisi

Di Tommaso

(1999). “Shear failure of concrete beams reinforced with FRP plates” Infrastructure Repair Methods, pp. 123–130.

Cooper

J. M.

, (2000). “Advanced composite materials for the 21st Century bridges: The Federal Highway Administration's prospective”, “Innovative Systems for Seismic Repair And Rehabilitation of Structures”, Technomic Publishing Co, Inc. Lancaster, Pennsylvania, pp. 131–142, March 2000.

Cheng

R.J.J.

Hutchinson

Rizkalla

(1997). “Rehabilitation of concrete bridges for shear deficiency using CFRP sheets” 42nd International SAMPE Symposium, pp. 325–335.

Crasto

, and Kim

(1997). “Rehabilitation of concrete bridge beams with fiber-reinforced composites”, 42nd International SAMPE Symposium, pp. 77–83.

GangaRao

H.V.S.

Vijay

(1998). “Bending behavior of concrete beams wrapped with carbon fabric”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 3–10.

Kachlakev

D. I.

, (1998). “Strengthening bridges using composite materials”, United Stated Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and the Oregon Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

Kachlakev

, and Barnes

(1999). “Flexural and shear performance of concrete beams strengthened with fiber reinforced polymer laminates”, Fourth International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures, the American Concrete Institute, SP-188, pp. 959–972.

10.

Kachlakev

Green

and Barnes

(1999). “Behavior of concrete specimens reinforced with composite materials-laboratory study”, United Stated Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and the Oregon Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

11.

Kachlakev

and McCurry

, (2000). “Testing of full-size reinforced concrete beams strengthened with FRP composites: Experimental results and design methods verification,” United Stated Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and the Oregon Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

12.

Laylor

H. Martin

and Kachlakev

D. I.

, (2000). “Fiber-reinforced polymer composites for strengthening bridges in Oregon”, TR News, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Number 208, May-June, 2000.

13.

McCurry

D.D.

, (2000). “Strengthening reinforced concrete beams using FRP composite fabrics: Full-scale experimental studies and design concept verification, Master of Science Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

14.

McCurry

D.D.

and Kachlakev

D. I.

, (2000). “Strengthening of full-scale reinforced concrete beams using FRP laminates and monitoring with fiber optic strain gages”, Innovative Systems for Seismic Repair And Rehabilitation of Structures, Technomic Publishing Co, Inc. Lancaster, Pennsylvania, pp. 131–142, March 2000.

15.

Rizkalla

Labossiere

(1999). “Planning for a new generation of infrastructure: Structural engineering with FRP-in Canada” Concrete International, pp. 25–28.

16.

Rostasy

F.S.

Hankers

Ranisch

E. H.

, (1992). “Strengthening of R/C- and P/C-structures with bonded FRP plates” Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, pp. 255–263.

17.

Ritchie

P.A.

(1991). “External reinforcement of concrete beams using fiber reinforced plastics” Structural Journal, ACI, Vol. 88, No. 4, pp. 490–496.

18.

Saadatmanesh

Ehsani

(1991). “RC beams strengthened with GFRP plates I: Experimental study” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 117, No. 11, Nov., pp. 3417–3433.