Inelastic Dynamic Response of RC Bridges Subjected to Spatial Non-Synchronous Earthquake Motion

Abstract

The assumption that earthquake response of extended structures, of which bridges is one example, may be studied ignoring the possibility of out-of-synch motion of various supports is examined in this paper. The purpose is to assess whether the reduction of dynamic response is sufficient to offset the increase in relative displacements, due to independent motion of different supports.

The paper starts with a review of possible damage patterns due to asynchronous motion. Thereafter, a brief literature review is undertaken, followed by an assessment of the status of seismic design codes concerning this issue. Advanced inelastic analysis, using sophisticated material models and analysis techniques, is then employed to explore characteristics of input motion and structural configuration, which may lead to unconservative results from conventional (synchronous) analysis. Natural and artificial earthquake records are applied, representing travelling wave as well as geometric incoherence effects. Two model structures of medium span RC bridges are studied, subjected to different boundary conditions that influence the mode contributions. This is undertaken under transverse, longitudinal and vertical earthquake motion. The large volume of results, represented as displacement and force time-histories as well as Fourier amplitude spectra of the acceleration response, are distilled and used to assess the balance between dynamic de-tuning and static relative displacements. It is concluded that the conventional synchronous case provides conservative results for vertical vibrations. However, unconservative results, of up to 30%, are obtained for transverse and longitudinal response of short periods of structural vibrations, as well as cases where the higher modes of response are likely to be excited.

Keywords

seismic behaviour bridges asynchronous motion reinforced concrete

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AASHTO (1996), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Standard Specification for Highway Bridges, sixteenth edition.

Abdel-Ghaffar

A.M.

and Nazmy

A.S.

(1988), “Nonlinear seismic response of cable-stayed bridges subjected to nonsynchronous support motion”, Proc. 9th WCEE Kyoto, Japan, VI: 483–488.

Abdel-Ghaffar

A.M.

and Rubin

L.I.

(1982), “Suspension bridge response to multiple-support excitations”, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE, 108: 419–435.

Benuska

(1990), “Loma Prieta earthquake reconnaissance report”, Earthquake Spectra, Supplement to Vol. 6, EERI.

Berrah

and Kausel

(1992), “Response spectrum analysis of structures subjected to spatially varying motions”, Earth. Eng. & Struct. Dyn., 21: 461–470.

Bogdanoff

J.L.

Goldberg

J.E.

and Schiff

A.J.

(1965), “The effect of ground transmission time on the response of long structures”, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 55: 627–640.

Broderick

B.M.

Elnashai

A.S.

Ambraseys

N.N.

Barr

J.M.

Goodfellow

R.G.

and Higazy

E.M.

(1994), “The Northridge (California) earthquake of 17 January 1994: Observations, strong motion and correlative response analyses”, ESEE Research Report, No. 94–4, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.

Calvi

G.M.

and Pinto

P.E.

(1996), “Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic response of bridges and recommendations for code provisions”, Prenormative Research in Support of Eurocode 8, European Consortium of Earthquake Shaking Tables, ECOEST/PREC8, Report No. 4, November.

Comartin

C.D.

Greene

and Tebbesing

S.K.

(1995), “The Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake, January 17, 1995 Preliminary Reconnaissance report”, EERI Report.

10.

Der Kiureghian

and Neuenhofer

(1992), “Reponse spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations”, Earth. Eng. & Struct. Dyn., 21: 713–740.

11.

Dumanoglu

A.A.

and Severn

R.T.

(1987), “Seismic response of modern suspension bridges to asynchronous vertical ground motion”, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Part 2, 83: 701–730.

12.

Elnashai

A.S.

Bommer

J.J.

Baron

C.I.

Lee

and Salama

A.I.

(1995), “Selected engineering seismology and structural engineering studies of the Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Great Hanshin) earthquake of 17 January 1995”, ESEE Research Report, No. 95–2, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.

13.

Elnashai

A.S.

Bommer

J.J.

and Elghazouli

A.Y.

(1989a), “The Loma Prieta, Santa Cruz, California Earthquake, 17th October 1989”, ESEE Research Report, No. 89–11, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.

14.

Elnashai

A.S.

Izzudin

B.A.

and Dowling

P.J.

(1989b), “Efficient large displacement elastoplastic dynamic analysis of structures”, J. of European Earth. Eng., 3: 32–41.

15.

EQE (1995), “The January 17, 1995 Kobe Earthquake”, Summary Report, April.

16.

Eurocode 8 (1998), Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures, Part 2. Bridges, ENV 1998–2: 1996, CEN.

17.

Fenves

G.L.

(1994), “Nonlinear dynamic analysis for earthquake response of bridges”, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Seismic Design of Bridges, New Zealand, 1: 2–22.

18.

Hall

J.F.

(1995), “Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994 Reconnaissance Report”, Vol. 11, Suppl. C, Earthquake Spectra, EERI Report.

19.

Harichandran

R.S.

and Vanmarcke

(1986), “Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time”, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE, 112: 154–174.

20.

Izzudin

B.A.

and Elnashai

A.S.

(1991), “ADAPTIC program for static and dynamic large displacement nonlinear analysis of space frames by adaptive mesh refinement”, User Manual, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.

21.

Japan Road Association (1996), Part V: Seismic Design, Design Specifications of Highway Bridges.

22.

Jennings

P.C.

(1971), “Engineering features of the San Fernardo earthquake February 9, 1971”, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, EERL Report No. 71–02, pp. 366–433, June.

23.

Kawashima

(1995), “Impact of Hanshin/Awaji earthquake on seismic design and seismic strengthening of highway bridges”, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Report No. TIT/EERG 95–2.

24.

Kawashima

Unjoh

and Azuta

(1988), “Seismic Design Procedure of Cable Stayed Bridges, Part 3: Effect of Multiple-Support Excitations on Seismic Response of Cable Stayed Bridges”, Technical Memorandum, No. 2630, Public Works Research Institute.

25.

Madas

P.J.

and Elnashai

A.S.

(1992), “A new passive confinement model for the analysis of concrete structures subjected to cyclic and transient dynamic loading”, Earth. Eng. & Struct. Dyn., 21: 409–431.

26.

Milne

(1892), “The great Japan earthquake of 1891”, Imperial University of Japan Report.

27.

Monti

(1997), Personal communications.

28.

Monti

Nuti

and Pinto

(1996), “Nonlinear response of bridges under multisupport excitation”, J. Struct. Eng. ASCE, 122(10): 1146–1159.

29.

Okubo

Arakawa

and Kawashima

(1982), “Spatial Variation of Earthquake Ground Motions on Seismic Response of Structures”, Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(10): 523–528.

30.

Perotti

(1990), “Structural response to non-stationary multiple support random excitation”, Earth. Eng. & Struct. Dyn., 19: 513–527.

31.

Priestley

M.J.N.

Seible

and Calvi

G.M.

(1996), “Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges”, Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

32.

Seible

Priestley

M.J.N.

and Macrae

(1995), “The Kobe earthquake of January 17, 1995, initial impressions from a quick reconnaissance”, University of California at San Diego, Report No. SSRP-95/03, February.

33.

Steinbrugge

K.V.

and Moran

D.F.

(1954), “An engineering study of the South California earthquake of July 21, 1952 and its aftershocks”, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 4(2B), 2nd Part.

34.

Tzanetos

Elnashai

A.S.

Hamdan

F.H.

and Antoniou

(1998), “Inelastic Dynamic Response of RC Bridges to Non-Synchronous Earthquake Input Motion”, Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (ESEE) Research Report No. 98–6, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.

35.

Yashinsky

(1998), “The Loma Prieta California Earthquake of October 17, 1989 — Highway Systems”, US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1552-B.

36.

Zerva

(1990), “Response of multi-span beams to spatially incoherent seismic ground motions”, Earth. Eng. & Struct. Dyn., 19: 819–832.