The Cyclic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Chimney Sections with and without Openings

Abstract

The most vulnerable feature of most existing tall reinforced concrete chimneys when subject to severe earthquake excitation is the relative weakness of the sections around the openings near the chimney base. This paper documents an experimental study undertaken to investigate the cyclic behaviour of typical chimney sections with openings orientated to be bending critical and shear critical and the results are compared with previous tests with no openings. Significantly, no such cyclic tests have been previously been completed. The experimental results presented include; failure mode, over-strength factor, ultimate curvature, available ductility, hysteretic behaviour and strain distribution and the results are compared with some predictive analytical section models and design guidelines. The research indicated that chimney sections with openings were not brittle, but were significantly less ductile than sections without openings. The paper is relevant for both assessing existing chimney stacks and for the design of new chimneys in the vicinity of openings.

Keywords

chimney stack seismic cyclic behaviour experimental tests reinforced concrete thin walled sections

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACI Committee 307. (1998). Standard Practices for the Design and Construction of Cast-in-Place Reinforced Concrete Chimneys, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA.

CICIND. (2001). Model Code for Concrete Chimneys – Part A: The Shell (commentary), International Committee on Industrial Chimneys, Switzerland.

Huang

Gould

P.L.

Martinez

and Johnson

G.S.

(2004). “Non-linear analysis of a collapsed reinforced concrete chimney”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 33, pp. 485–498.

Kilic

S.A.

and Sozen

M.A.

(2003). “Evaluation of effects of August 17, 1999, Marmara earthquake on two tall reinforced concrete chimneys”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 100, pp. 357–364.

Mokrin

Z.A.R.

and Rumman

W.S.

(1985). “Ultimate capacity of reinforced concrete members of hollow circular sections subjected on monotonic and cyclic bending”, ACI Journal, Vol. 82, No. 5, pp. 653–656.

Omote

and Takeda

(1975). Experimental and Analytical Study on Reinforced Concrete Chimneys, Japan Earthquake Engineering Promotion Society, Tokyo.

Priestley

M.J.N.

and Park

(1987). “Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 61–76.

Regan

P.E.

and Hamadi

Y.D.

(1981). “Behaviour of concrete caisson and tower members”, in Concrete in the Oceans, Technical Report No. 4, CIRIA/UEG, Cement and Concrete Association, Department of Energy, United Kingdom.

Schober

and Schlaich

(1984). “Ultimate strength of reinforced concrete chimneys”, Proceedings of the CICIND 5th International Conference, Essex UK, pp 37–42.

10.

Whittaker

(1988). Seismic Performance of Offshore Concrete Platforms, Report No. 88-1, University of Canterbury, Department of Civil Engineering.

11.

Wilson

J.L.

(2000). “Code recommendations for the aseismic design of tall reinforced concrete chimneys”, CICIND Report, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 8–12.

12.

Wilson

J.L.

(2002). “Aseismic design of tall reinforced concrete chimneys”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 99 No. 5, pp. 622–630.

13.

Wilson

J.L.

(2003). “Earthquake response of tall reinforced concrete chimneys”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 11–24.

14.

Wilson

J.L.

(2003). “Investigation of the cyclic behaviour of reinforced concrete chimney sections with openings: Part 1 – Experimental study”, CICIND Report, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 9–15.

15.

Wilson

J.L.

(2006). “Investigation of the cyclic behaviour of reinforced concrete chimney sections with openings orientated to be shear critical”, CICIND Report, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 43–49

16.

Yeh

Y.K.

Y.L.

and Yang

C.Y.

(2001). “Seismic performance of hollow circular bridge piers”, ACI Journal, Vol. 98, No. 6, pp. 862–871

17.

Zhan

F.A.

Park

and Priestley

M.J.N.

(1990). “Flexural strength and ductility of circular hollow reinforced columns without confinement on inside face”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 156–166.