This paper suggests a climate policy that integrates adaptation funds into a harmonized carbon tax approach. In the proposed approach, the world will set a carbon tax assuming that vulnerable sectors will adapt to future changes at its full capacity. At the same time, the world will support climate adaptation programs at a regional level. A mitigation policy will be set at the global level while adaptation measures will be taken at a local or regional level. The carbon revenue generated from a mitigation program will be used to support adaptation aid programs in developing countries. This augmented carbon tax approach has the capacity to deal with climate inequities while it creates additional incentives for developing countries to participate in a global mitigation effort.
GoulderL. and BovenbergA. L.. 1996. Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General Equilibrium Analyses. American Economic Review86:985–1000.
5.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).2007a. The Physical Science Basis, Fourth Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).2007b. Impacts, Adaptations, and Vulnerability, Fourth Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7.
ManneA. S.MendelsohnR. and RichelsR. G.. 1995. MERGE: A Model for Evaluating Regional and Global Effects of GHG Reduction Policies. Energy Policy23:17–34.
8.
MendelsohnR., and WilliamsL.. 2006. Dynamic Forecasts of the Sectoral Impacts of Climate Change. In Schlesinger (Eds.). Human-Induced Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
MendelsohnR.DinarA., and WilliamsL.. 2006. The Distributional Impact of Climate Change on Rich and Poor Countries. Environment and Development Economics11(02): 159–178.
10.
NordhausW.1977. Economic Growth and Climate: The Case of Carbon Dioxide. American Economic Review67:341–346.
11.
NordhausW.1992. An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases. Science, 258(5086):1315:1319.
12.
NordhausW.2007. To Tax or Not to Tax: Alternative Approaches to Slow Global Warming. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy1 (1):22–44.
13.
NordhausW., 2008. A Question of Balance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
14.
PearceD.W.ClineW.R.AchantaA.FankhauserS.PachauriR.TolR. and VellingaP. (1996) “The Social Costs of Climate Change: Greenhouse Damage and the Benefits of Control”, in BruceJ.LeeH. and HaitesE. (eds.) Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 183–224.
15.
SamuelsonP.1954. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics36: 387–389.
16.
SeoS. N., 2007. Is Stern Review on Climate Change Alarmist?. Energy and Environment18(5): 521–532.
17.
SeoS. N. and MendelsohnR.2008. Measuring Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change: A Structural Ricardian Model of African Livestock Management. Agricultural Economics38 (2):151–165.
18.
SmitBarry and PilifosovaOlga. 2001. Adaptation to Climate Change in the Context of Sustainable Development and Equity. In McCarthyJ.J.CanzianniO.F.LearyN.A.DokkenD.J., and WhiteK.S., eds., Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and vulnerability – Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
19.
SternN., 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
TolR., 2002. Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change, Part 1: Benchmark Estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics, 21, 47–73
21.
YoheG.TolR., and MurphyD.2007. On Setting Near-term Climate Policy While the Dust Begins to Settle: The Legacy of the Stern Review. Energy & Environment18: 621–633.
