Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper investigates the economic costs of pollution due to sulphur dioxide emissions in China and their impacts on human health and ecosystems in Northeast Asia, specifically China and Japan. We compare actual emission charging as practiced in China with the estimated domestic and regional “optimal” charges. The analysis demonstrates that, while the actual SO₂ emission charge in China has been increased, it may be still less than the estimated domestic “optimal” charge incorporating damage costs only on human health by dry deposition in a gaseous form, excluding damage costs caused by acid rain in China. Nevertheless, it would be still beneficial for Japan to financially assist China with its SO₂ reduction because the percent contribution by northeast China to deposition in Japan is increasing.

Keywords

Pollution Control Northeast Asia China Sulphur Dioxide

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Calori

, Interannual Variability in Sulphur Deposition in Asia, Journal of Global Environmental Engineering, 2001, 7, 1–16.

Colls

, Air Pollution, An Introduction, E & FN SPON, 1997.

CSERGE, EU Report, CSERGE Technical Paper, Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, 1995.

European Commission, EXTERN E, Externalities of Energy, European Commission, 1995.

Hayami

and Ichikawa

, Development of hybrid LRT model to estimate sulphur deposition in Japan, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1995, 85, 2015–2020.

Ikeda

, Estimates of atmospheric pollution for East Asia – Estimates of sulphur dioxide emissions in China, Journal of Japan Society for Atmospheric Environment, 1995, 30, 374–390.

Kochi

, Cost Benefit Analysis of the Sulphur Dioxide Emissions Control Policy in Japan, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2001, 4, 219–233.

, The System for Environmental Protection in China, Toyo Keizai (in Japanese), 1999.

Nakada

and Pearce

, Acid Rain in East Asia, an Analysis of Side-Payments, Energy and Environment, 1999, 10, 705–720.

10.

Morgenstern

R. D.

, Emissions Trading to Improve Air Quality in an Industrial City in the People's Republic of China, RFF Discussion Paper 04–16, Resources for the Future, 2004.

11.

Ostro

and Chestnut

, Assessing the Health Benefits of Reducing Particulate Matter Air Pollution in the United States, Environmental Research, 1998, 76, 94–106.

12.

Park

C. C.

, Acid Rain, Rhetoric and Reality, Routledge, 1990.

13.

Schreifels

, Emissions Trading China, - A Journey of a Thousand Miles -, Environmental Finance, 2005, April, 19.

14.

Takahashi

, Problems of Environmental Cooperation in Northeast Asia: The Case of Acid Rain, in Harris

eds., International Environmental Cooperation: Politics and Diplomacy in Pacific Asia, University Press of Colorado, 221–247, 2002.

15.

WB, ADB and IIASA, Rains-Asia CD-ROM ver.7.52, Institute for International Applied Systems Analysis, 2001.

16.

Wang

, eds., SO₂ Emissions Trading Program: US Experience and China's Perspective, China Environmental Science Press, 2000.

17.

World Bank, Clear Water, Blue Skies; China's Environment in the New Century, World Bank, 1997.

18.

Xu , Economic Damage of Environmental Pollution in China, China Environmental Science Press (in Chinese), 1998.