In the present study, we have developed a batch reactor setup to monitor the formation of biogas using sago (cassava) wastewater for the first time. The experimental parameters like pH, COD, BOD, volatile solids, have been tested to optimize the production of biogas. The liberated biogas was analyzed and found that, about 65 – 70 % of methane and remaining 20–25 % of CO2. Sago effluent contains large amount of organic material which has a potential to cause water pollution. In order to reduce this problem, an experiment was conducted to remove organic material and biogas recovery from sago effluent using lab scale batch reactor. The biogas produced in the first reactor of 750 ml feed was 3393 ml per liter of liquid waste and similarly the biogas produced in the second reactor of 1250 ml feed was 3068 ml per liter of liquid waste.
Edison, Diagnostic study SME the Sago & Starch Industry cluster Salem (Tamil Nadu), 1999.
2.
AnantharamanM.RamanathanS.EdisonS., and SethuramanP.S.Transfer of tropical tuber crops technologies; Means, Modes and methods. CTCRI technical bulletin series No.35, CTCRI, Thiruvananthapuram, 2001.
3.
NandyTapasKaulSanthohn and ShastrySunita. Waste management in tapioca based sago industry. In: Sago serve, Salem (GuptaAshok Kumar Ed.) Vol: 1 – 15. 1996.
4.
RaoP.V.BaralS.S.DeyR.MutnuriS.Biogas generation potential by anaerobic digestion for sustainable energy development in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010, 14, 2086–2094.
5.
ParawiraW.MurtoM.ReadJ.S.MattiassonB.Profile of hydrolases and biogas production during two-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion of solid potato, waste. Process Biochemistry. 2005, 40 (9), 2945–2952.
6.
BonczM.A.BezerraL.P.IdeC.N.PauloP.L.Optimisation of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of agro-industrial waste streams in Brazil. Water Sci Technol. 2008, 58(8):1659–64.
7.
YangM.I.EdwardsE.A.AllenD.G.Anaerobic treatability and biogas production potential of selected in-mill streams. Water Sci Technol. 2010, 62(10):2427–34.
8.
NeiraK.JeisonD.Anaerobic co-digestion of surplus yeast and wastewater to increase energy recovery in breweries. Water Sci Technol. 2010, 61(5):1129–35.
9.
SreekanthD.SivaramakrishnaD.HimabinduV.AnjaneyuluY.Thermophilic treatment of bulk drug pharmaceutical industrial wastewaters by using hybrid up flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2009, 100(9):2534–2539.
10.
MolettaR.Winery and distillery wastewater treatment by anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol. 2005, 51(1):137–44.
11.
DemirerG.N.DuranM.ErgüderT.H.GüvenE.UgurluO.TezelU.Anaerobic treatability and biogas production potential studies of different agro-industrial wastewaters in Turkey. Biodegradation. 2000, 11(6):401–5.
12.
ErgüderT.H.TezelU.GüvenE.DemirerG.N.Anaerobic biotransformation and methane generation potential of cheese whey in batch and UASB reactors. Waste Manag. 2001, 21(7):643–50.
13.
TartakovskyB.MehtaP.BourqueJ.S.GuiotS.R.Electrolysis-enhanced anaerobic digestion of wastewater. Bioresour Technol. doi:10.1016/j.biortech. 2011, 02.09.
14.
KaparajuP.SerranoM.ThomsenA.KongjanP.AngelidakiI., Bioethanol biohydrogen and biogas production from wheat strawin a biorefinery concept. Bioresour Technol. 2009, 100(1):2562–2568.
15.
RiañoB.MolinuevoB.García-GonzálezM.C.Potential for methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with winery wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2011, 102(5):4131–4136.
16.
Ilter Turkdogan-AydinolF.YetilmezsoyKaan. A fuzzy-logic-based model to predict biogas and methane production rates in a pilot-scale mesophilic UASB reactor treating molasses wastewaterJournal of Hazardous Materials. 2010, 182, 1–3, 460–471.
17.
RachelC.WagnerJohnM.ReganSang-Eun OhZuoYiBruceE.Logan. Hydrogen and methane production from swine wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells, Water Research. 2009, 43, (5), 1480–1488.
18.
Maya-AltamiraL.BaunA.AngelidakiI.SchmidtJ.E.. Influence of wastewater characteristics on methane potential in food-processing industry wastewaters, Water Research. 2008, 42, (8–9), 2195–2203.
19.
GelegenisJohnGeorgakakisDimitrisAngelidakiIriniChristopoulouNicholettaGoumenakiMaria, Optimization of biogas production from olive-oil mill wastewater, by codigesting with diluted poultry-manure, Applied Energy. 2007, 84646–663.
20.
MargaritaA.D.SpyrosN.D.KaterinaS.ConstantinaZ.MichaelK.Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of agroindustrial wastewaters under mesophilic conditions in a two-stage process. Desalinatation. 2009, 248, 891–906.
21.
SaravananR.MurthyD. V.KrishnaiahK.Anaerobic treatment and biogas recovery for sago wastewater management using a fluidized bed reactor. Water Science and Technology. 2001, 44(6):141–146.
22.
Rajesh BanuJ.KaliappanSudalyandiBeckDieter. Treatment of Sago Wastewater Using Hybrid Anaerobic Reactor, Water Qual. Res. J. Canada, 2006, 41,(1), 56–62.
23.
Rajesh BanuJ.KaliappanS.BeckD.High rate anaerobic treatment of Sago wastewater using HUASB with PUF as carrier, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech.2006, 3, (1), 69–77.
24.
ParthibanR.IyerP.V.R.SekaranG.Anaerobic Tapered Fluidised Bed Reactor for Treatment of Sago Industry Effluent, Indian Chemical Engineer. 2008, 50(4), 323–333.
25.
APHA, standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. American health association, Washington, 1989.
