Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The extent to which a wind energy site is affected by a coastal cliff is presented by studying numerically a neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) flow using an RNG k-ε model and different geometries. Initially, the classical flow over a forward-facing step is modelled, followed by the modelling of a neutral ABL over a rough plane in two and three dimensions with various types of ground conditions. Finally, the two and three-dimensional flows over a forward-facing step, representing a coastal cliff, in a neutral ABL were modelled and applied to the Atlantic Wind Test Site (AWTS), site composed of a wind turbine testing facility and a 13 MW wind farm, in the province of Prince Edward Island, Canada. After assessing that the model can predict classical flows and ABL with relatively good accuracy and robustness, the results show that the extent of the effect of a coastal cliff on the flow above the AWTS is limited to a distance of 5h downstream of the (height h = 10 m) cliff. Based on the sitting of the existing wind power infrastructure, it appears that the coastal cliff does not influence the power capacity of the site.

Keywords

Computational wind engineering atmospheric boundary layer forward-facing step coastal cliff roughness height full size comparisons

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Stathopoulos

The numerical wind tunnel for industrial aerodynamics: Real or virtual in the new millennium

Wind and Structures 2002;5:193–208.

Moss

Baker

Recirculating flows associated with two dimensional steps. Aeronautical Quarterly 1980;31:151–172.

Easom

. Improved turbulence models for computational wind engineering. PhD thesis, School of Civil Eng., The University of Nottingham 2000.

Castro

Graham

JMR

. Numerical wind engineering: The way ahead Proc. of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings 1999;134:275–277.

Murakami

Comparisons of various turbulence models applied to a bluff body. J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aerod. 1993;46 & 47:21–36.

Richards

Parker

Quinn

. A 6 m cube in an atmospheric boundary layer flow Part 2. Computational solutions. Wind and Structures 2002;5:177–192.

Yakhot

Orszag

Renormalization group analysis of turbulence, J. of Scientific Computing 1986;1(1):3–51.

Launder

Spalding

. The numerical computation of turbulent flow. Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 269–289, 1974.

Zhang

. Numerical prediction of turbulent recirculating flows with k-ε model. J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aero. 1993;51:177–201.

10.

Richards

Hoxey

. Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ε turbulence model. J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aero. 1993;46 & 47:145–153.

11.

Fluent Ltd., Fluent 6.0 Documentation 2001.

12.

Hoxey

Richards

Short

. A 6 m cube in an atmospheric boundary layer flow Part 1. Full-scale and wind-tunnel results. Wind and Structures 2002;5:165–176.

13.

Spera

. Wind turbine technology. New York: ASME PRESS, 1998.

14.

Wind Data and Analysis Atlantic Provinces 1953–2003. Atlantic Climate Centre, Environment Canada Atlantic Region, February 2004.

15.

De Brederode

Bradshaw

Influence of the side walls on the turbulent centre – plane boundary layer in a square duct. ASME J. of Fluids Eng. 1978;100:91–96.

Study of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows over a Coastal Cliff

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References