A numerical analysis of the flow near the nacelles of two wind turbines is performed through 3D RANS simulations with the k-ω sst turbulence model. The rotor is modeled using three approaches: two techniques based on the actuator disk and one based on the actuator line. The effects of the rotor representation on the predicted flow at the location of the nacelle anemometer are quantified. In general, agreement with measurements is better for the actuator line than the actuator disk which tends to underestimate the wind speed in the very near wake. At low wind speeds, the three rotor modelling techniques predict nearly identical nacelle transfer functions; differences appear at higher wind speed where the the actuator line is slightly better compared to the other techniques.
SmithB.LinkH.RandallG.McCoyT., 2002. “Applicability of Nacelle Anemometer Measurements for Use in Turbine Power Performance Tests”. InAWEA Windpower Conference2002, no. May.
4.
CutlerN. J.OuthredH. R.IainF., 2012. “Using nacelle-based wind speed observations to improve power curve modeling for wind power forecasting”. Wind Energy, 15, pp. 245–258.
5.
DuqueE. P. N.BurklundM. D.JohnsonW., 2003. “Navier-Stokes and Comprehensive Analysis Performance Predictions of the NREL Phase VI Experiment”. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 125(4), p. 457.
6.
ZahleF.SørensenN. N.JohansenJ., 2009. “Wind Turbine Rotor-Tower Interaction Using an Incompressible Overset Grid Method”. Wind Energy, 12, pp. 594–619.
7.
ZahleF.SørensenN. N., 2011. “Characterization of the unsteady flow in the nacelle region of a modern wind turbine”. Wind Energy, 14, pp. 271–283.
8.
MikkelsenR.SørensenJ. N.ShenW. Z., 2001. “Modelling and analysis of the flow field around a coned rotor”. Wind Energy, 4(3), July, pp. 121–135.
9.
AmmaraI.LeclercC.MassonC., 2002. “A Viscous Three-Dimensional Differential/Actuator-Disk Method for the Aerodynamic Analysis of Wind Farms”. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 124(4), pp. 345–356.
10.
Porté-AgelF.WuY.LuH.ConzemiusR. J., 2011. “Large-eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flow through wind turbines and wind farms”. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99(4), Apr., pp. 154–168.
11.
SmailiA.MassonC., 2004. “On the rotor effects upon nacelle anemometry for wind turbines”. Wind Engineering, 28(6), pp. 695–714.
12.
MassonC.SmaïliA., 2006. “Numerical study of turbulent flow around a wind turbine nacelle”. Wind Energy, 9(3), May, pp. 281–298.
13.
AmeurK.MassonC.EecenP. J., 2011. “2D and 3D numerical simulation of the wind-rotor/nacelle interaction in an atmospheric boundary layer”. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99(8), Aug., pp. 833–844.
14.
TroldborgN.ZahleF.RéthoréP.-E.SørensenN. N., 2012. “Comparison of the wake of different types of wind turbine CFD models”. In 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, no. January, pp. 1–11.
15.
SørensenJ. N.ShenW. Z., 2002. “Numerical Modeling of Wind Turbine Wakes”. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124(2), pp. 393–399.
16.
MenterF. R., 1994. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications”. AIAA Journal, 32(8), pp. 1598–1605.
17.
ProspathopoulosJ. M.PolitisE. S.ChaviaropoulosP. K., 2008. “Modelling wind turbine wakes in complex terrain”. In European Wind Energy Conference & Exhibition, Vol. 14, pp. 42–46.
18.
PolitisE. S.ProspathopoulosJ.CabezonD.HansenK. S.ChaviaropoulosP. K.BarthelmieR. J., 2011. “Modeling wake effects in large wind farms in complex terrain: The problem, the methods and the issues”. Wind Energy, online.
19.
BoudreaultL.-E.DufresneL.MassonC., 2011. “Numerical modeling of flow separation in neutral atmospheric boundary layer using the k-w SST turbulence model”. In19th Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada.
20.
Fluent, 2009. Ansys fluent 12.0 Theory Guide. No. April.
LaunderB. E.SpaldingD. B., 1974. “The numerical computation of turbulent flows”. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 3(2), pp. 269–289.
23.
JiménezA.CrespoA.MigoyaE., 2010. “Application of a LES technique to characterize the wake deflection of a wind turbine in yaw”. Wind Energy, 13, pp. 559–572.
24.
WuY.-T.Porté-Agel?F., 2011. “Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind-Turbine Wakes: Evaluation of Turbine Parametrisations”. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 138(3), Dec., pp. 345–366.
25.
MikkelsenR., 2003. “Actuator Disc Methods Applied to Wind Turbines”. PhD thesis, Technical University of Den-mark.
26.
Sheldahl REK. P., 1981. Aerodynamic characteristics of seven airfoil sections through 180 degrees angle of attack for use in aerodynamic analysis of vertical axis wind turbines. Tech. rep., Sandia National Laboratories, Technical Report SAND80–2114.
27.
DiznabiB., 2009. “Investigation of the flow relation to nacelle anemometry. Master's Thesis, Danish Technical University.”PhD thesis, Danish Technical University.
28.
BakC.FuglsangP.SørensenN. N.MadsenH. A.ShenW. Z.SørensenJ. N., 1999. Airfoil Characteristics for Wind Turbines. Risø-R-1065. Tech. Rep. March, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark.
29.
MadsenH. A., 1998. Forskning i Aeroelasticitet Rapport for EFP-97. Risø-R-1066(DA). Tech. Rep. August, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark.
30.
HaansW.SantT.van KuikG.van BusselG., 2005. “Measurement of Tip Vortex Paths in the Wake of a HAWT Under Yawed Flow Conditions”. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 127(4), p. 456.
31.
Sibuet WattersC.BretonS. P.MassonC., 2010. “Application of the actuator surface concept to wind turbine rotor aerodynamics”. Wind Energy, 13, pp. 433–447.
