A detailed review of the current state-of-art for wind turbine blade design is presented, including theoretical maximum efficiency, propulsion, practical efficiency, HAWT blade design, and blade loads. The review provides a complete picture of wind turbine blade design and shows the dominance of modern turbines almost exclusive use of horizontal axis rotors. The aerodynamic design principles for a modern wind turbine blade are detailed, including blade plan shape/quantity, aerofoil selection and optimal attack angles. A detailed review of design loads on wind turbine blades is offered, describing aerodynamic, gravitational, centrifugal, gyroscopic and operational conditions.
DominyR., Self-starting capability of a Darrieus turbine. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2007. 221(1): P. 111–120.
3.
HoldsworthB.Green light for unique NOVA offshore wind turbine. 2009; Available from: www.reinforcedplastics.com. (accessed on 08/05/2012).
4.
GaschR.TweleJ., Wind Power Plants2002, Berlin: Solarpraxis.
5.
Gorban'A.N.GorlovA.M.SilantyevV.M., Limits of the turbine efficiency for free fluid flow. Journal of Energy Resources Technology-Transactions of the Asme, 2001. 123(4): P. 311–317.
6.
BurtonT., Wind Energy Handbook. 2006 ed 2001, Chichester: John wiley & Sons Ltd. 2011.
7.
HullD.G., Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics2007, berlin: springer.
YurdusevM.A.AtaR.CetinN.S., Assessment of optimum tip speed ratio in wind turbines using artificial neural networks. Energy, 2006. 31(12): P. 2153–2161.
10.
DuquetteM.M.VisserK.D., Numerical implications of solidity and blade number on rotor performance of horizontal-axis wind turbines. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 2003. 125(4): P. 425–432.
11.
OerlemansS.SijtsmaP.LopezB.M., Location and quantification of noise sources on a wind turbine. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006. 299(4–5): P. 869–883.
12.
ChattotJ.J., Optimization of wind turbines using helicoidal vortex model. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 2003. 125(4): P. 418–424.
13.
FuglsangP.MadsenH.A., Optimization method for wind turbine rotors. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999. 80(1–2): P. 191–206.
14.
JureczkoM.PawlakM.MezykA., Optimisation of wind turbine blades. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005. 167(2–3): P. 463–471.
15.
HabaliS.M.SalehI.A., Local design, testing and manufacturing of small mixed airfoil wind turbine blades of glass fiber reinforced plastics Part I: Design of the blade and root. Energy Conversion and Management, 2000. 41(3): P. 249–280.
16.
ThresherR.W.DodgeD.M., Trends in the evolution of wind turbine generator configurations and systems. Wind Energy, 1998. 1(S1): P. 70–86.
17.
GipeP., The Wind Industrys Experience with Aesthetic Criticism. Leonardo, 1993. 26(3): P. 243–248.
18.
ChamberlainD.E., The effect of avoidance rates on bird mortality predictions made by wind turbine collision risk models. Ibis, 2006. 148: P. 198–202.
19.
MaalawiK.Y.BadrM.A., A practical approach for selecting optimum wind rotors. Renewable Energy, 2003. 28(5): P. 803–822.
20.
GriffithsR.T., The effect of aerofoil charachteristics on windmill performance. Aeronautical Journal, 1977. 81(July 1977): P. 322–326.
21.
DrelaM., XFoil, 2000, MIT, USA. p. Airfoil aerodynamic predictions.
22.
DrelaM., Xfoil User Primer, 2001.
23.
TimmerW.A.van RooijR.P.J.O.M., Summary of the Delft University wind turbine dedicated airfoils. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 2003. 125(4): P. 488–496.
24.
AbbottI.H.DoenhoffA.v, Theory of wind sections1949, London: McGraw-Hill.
25.
RooijR.P.J.O.M.TimmerW., Roughness sensitivity considerations for thick rotor blade airfoils. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 2003. 125(4): P. 468–478.
26.
FuglsangP.BakC., Development of the Riso wind turbine airfoils. Wind Energy, 2004. 7(2): P. 145–162.
27.
PolinderH., Comparison of direct-drive and geared generator concepts for wind turbines. Ieee Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2006. 21(3): P. 725–733.
28.
GuptaS.LeishmanJ.G., Dynamic stall modelling of the S809 aerofoil and comparison with experiments. Wind Energy, 2006. 9(6): P. 521–547.
29.
StolK.A.ZhaoW.X.WrightA.D., Individual blade pitch control for the controls advanced research turbine (CART). Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 2006. 128(4): P. 498–505.
30.
BossanyiE.A., Individual blade pitch control for load reduction. Wind Energy, 2003. 6(2): P. 119–128.
31.
BarlasT.K.van KuikG.A.M., Review of state of the art in smart rotor control research for wind turbines. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2010. 46: P. 1–27.
32.
BarlasT.LacknerM.The Application of Smart Structures for Large Wind Turbine Rotor Blades; Proceedings of The Iea Topical Expert Meeting; Delft University of Technology: Delft, The Netherlands, 2006.
33.
ThorS.The application of smart structures for large wind turbine rotor blades; Proceedings of the IEA topical expert meeting; Sandia National Labs: Alberquerque, NM, USA, 2008.
34.
KongC.BangJ.SugiyamaY., Structural investigation of composite wind turbine blade considering various load cases and fatigue life. Energy, 2005. 30(11–12): P. 2101–2114.
35.
QuartonD.C., The evolution of wind turbine design analysis - a twenty year progress review, 1998. p. 5–24.
36.
AhlstromA., Emergency stop simulation using a finite element model developed for large blade deflections. Wind Energy, 2006. 9(3): P. 193–210.
37.
KishinamiK., Theoretical and experimental study on the aerodynamic characteristics of a horizontal axis wind turbine. Energy, 2005. 30(11–12): P. 2089–2100.
38.
BrondstedP.LilholtH.LystrupA., Composite materials for wind power turbine blades. Annual Review of Materials Research, 2005. 35: P. 505–538.
39.
JensenF.M., Structural testing and numerical simulation of a 34 m composite wind turbine blade. Composite Structures, 2006. 76(1–2): P. 52–61.
40.
VeritasD.N., Design and Manufacture of Wind Turbine Blades, Offshore and Onshore Turbines; Standard DNV-DS-J102, Det Norske Veritas, Denmark, 2010.
41.
CaseJ.ChilverA.H., Strength Of Materials1959, London: Edward Arnold Ltd.
42.
GriffinD.A.ZuteckM.D., Scaling of composite wind turbine blades for rotors of 80 to 120 meter diameter. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 2001. 123(4): P. 310–318.
43.
ShokriehM.M.RafieeR., Simulation of fatigue failure in a full composite wind turbine blade. Composite Structures, 2006. 74(3): P. 332–342.
44.
BS IEC 61400–1:2005 Part 1: Design RequirementsBSi British Standards; London, 2012.
45.
KenscheC.W., Fatigue of composites for wind turbines. International Journal of Fatigue, 2006. 28(10): P. 1363–1374.
