The paper explores the possibilities offered by evolutionary multi-objective algorithms in structural design. The developed procedure includes the parameterization of a 3D structure, the automatic generation of a finite element (FE) model, and the optimum design. The search of the optimum solution is dealt with using two commercial software packages: Straus7, for FE analysis, and modeFrontier, for optimal search, interlinked by a program purposely developed (SCU, system control unit). The optimum design of a structure needs a different approach with respect to the traditional design. The paper presents a possible approach and describes more in detail the data pre and post processing including the choice of the solutions on the Pareto's front. A case study, a steel-glass vault roof built in Badenweiler (Germany), is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. A significant economical saving can be achieved when the optimum design solution is used. The proposed algorithm can then be employed as a useful tool to help the designer in the complex design process.
MosesF.Optimum structural design using linear programming. Journal of Struct. Div., ASCE90(6), 1964, 89–104.
2.
QianL.X.ZhangW.X.SiuY.K.ZhangJ.T.. Efficient optimum design of structures - program DDDU. Computer Methods in Appl. Mech. and Engineering, 30, 1982, 209–224.
3.
Al-HussainyMM.ErbaturF.. Optimum design of frames. Computers and structures, 45(5/6), 1992, 887–891.
4.
TuckerA.W.KuhnH.W.. Nonlinear programming. University of California Press, ed. Proc, 2nd Berkeley Symp. on Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, Calif., 1951, 481–492.
5.
RaoS.S.Engineering optimization: Theory and practice. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1996.
6.
GoldbergD.E.Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., New York, 1989.
7.
GenM.ChengR.. Genetic Al gorithms and Engineering Design. Wiley-Interscience Publ. John Wiley and Sons Inc., 121, 1996. ?
8.
HajelaP.LinC.Y.. Genetic algorithms in optimization problems with discrete and integer design variables. Engineering Optimization, 19, 1992, 309–327.
9.
RajanS.D.Sizing, shape, and topology design optimization of trusses using genetic algorithm. Journal of Structural Engineering, 121(10), 1995, 1480–1487.
10.
AkhtarS.PrasadJ.TaiK.WangS.. Structural topology optimization using a genetic algorithm and a morphological representation of geometry. HPCES Technical Parallel Session, Singapore, 2003.
11.
CaoG.CampC.V.PezeshkS.. Optimized design of two-dimensional structures using a genetic algorithm. Journal of structural engineering, 124(5), 1998, 551–559.
12.
DorigoM.Ant foraging behaviour, combinatorial optimization, and routing in communications networks. Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems, 25, 1999.
13.
KameshkiE.S.SakaM.P.. Optimum design of nonlinear elastic framed domes. Advances in Engineering Software, 29(7–9), 1998, 519–528.
14.
KikuchiN.Bends∅eM.P.. Generating optimal topology in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 71, 1988.
15.
KrishnamoorthyC.S.RajeevS.. Discrete optimization of structures using genetic algorithms. Journal of structural engineering, 118(5), 1992, 1233–1250.
16.
IlkerT.KiliáH.ErbaturF.HasanáebiO.. Optimal design of planar and space structures with genetic algorithms. Computers and structures, 75, 2000, 209–224.
17.
SakaM.P.Optimum design of steel frames with stability constraints. Computer and Structures, 41(6), 1991, 1365–1377.
18.
ZongW.G.KangS.L.. A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Computers and Structures, 82, 2004.
19.
GandhiJ.B.PatodiS.C.. Optimal design of cable structures with genetic algoritms. International Journal of Space Structures, 16, 4, 2001, 271–278.
20.
PapadrakakisM.LagarosN.D.TsompanakisY. Optimization of large-scale 3D trusses using evolution strategies and neural network. International Journal of Space Structures, 14, 3, 1999, 211–223.
21.
SalajeghehE.SalajeghehJ.. Continuous-discrete variable optimization of space structures with sizing variables using approximation methods. International Journal of Space Structures, 16, 4, 2001, 237–251.
22.
EN 1990. Eurocode - Basis of structural design. European Committee for Standardization, April 2002.
23.
prEN 1993-1-1. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, December 2003. Final draft.
24.
prEN 13474–1. Glass in building - Design of glass panes, part 1: General basis of design. CEN TC/129 WG/8, January 1999. Draft.
25.
prEN 13474–2. Glass in building - Design of glass panes, part 2: Design for uniformly distributed loads. CEN TC/129 WG/8, February 2000. Draft.
26.
Strand7 Pty Ltd.API Manual, Documentation for the Straus7 Application Programming Interface, 3 edition, April 2003. API Release 2.2.2.
27.
MajowieckiM.Tensostrutture: Progetto e verifica. Ed. CREA, 1994 (in Italian).
28.
MastropasquaA.GoriR.MajowieckiM.. Le strutture di stabilizzazione di grandi superfici di tanponamento: Studi per il padiglione 19–20 della fiera di Bologna. Costruzioni Metalliche, 3, 2004 (in Italian).
29.
HollandJ.H.Adaptation in natural and artificial system. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1975.
30.
ES.TEC.O S.r.l. modeFRONTIER(c) user manual, 3 edition, 2004.
MetropolisN.RosenbluthA.RosenbluthM.TellerA.TellerE.. Journal of Chemical Physics1953, 21, 1087.
33.
RigoniE.PolesS.. NBI and MOGA-II, two complementary algorithms for Multi-Objective optimizations. Practical Approaches to Multi-Objective Optimization, 2005.
34.
PolesS.RigoniE.RobicT.. MOGA-II Performance on Noisy Optimization Problems. Bioinspired Optimization Methods and Their Applications, Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinspired Optimization Methods and their Applications. October 2004, 51–62.
