The objective of this paper is to explore patterns of incompetence and disease distribution in patients with chronic venous disorders and to correlate this with CEAP (Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic and Pathologic) classification and presenting symptoms to determine which features of chronic venous disorder (CVD) could be used to guide a patient pathway for referral and treatment. Consecutive patients attending a one-stop venous clinic at a university teaching hospital were recruited over a 12-month period. Patients were clinically assessed, assigned CEAP scores, duplex-scanned and categorized. Data were analyzed to identify associations between symptomatology and disease. Four hundred twenty-four limbs were divided into groups A (C2–3) (339) and B (C4–6) (85). The number of men, mean patient age, varicose vein diameter and quality-of-life score (Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire – AVVS) were significantly higher in group B (P < 0.01). Ache occurred more commonly in group A and in women (P < 0.01). Ache and pain were seen more frequently with saphenofemoral junction reflux (P < 0.05). Group A women were more likely to be offered surgical intervention while men were managed conservatively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, CVD symptoms are independent of disease severity assessed by CEAP score. Advanced disease is associated with larger venous diameters, older age and corresponds to a poorer quality of life. Objective markers such as CEAP, Venous Clinical Severity Score and AVVS should be used in determining a patient pathway for referral and treatment of CVD.
TrendelemburgF. Uber die Tunderbindung der Vena Saphena Magna bie unterschenkel varicen. Beitr Z Clin Chir1890;7:195
5.
WongJKF, DuncanJL, NicholsDM. Whole-leg duplex mapping for varicose veins: observations on patterns of reflux in recurrent and primary legs, with clinical correlations. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2003;25:267–75
6.
SeidelA, MirandaF, JulianoY, NovoN, dos SantosJ, de SouzaD. Prevalence of varicose veins and venous anatomy in patients without truncal saphenous reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2004;28:387–90
7.
Abu-OwnA, ScurrJH, Coleridge SmithP. Saphenous vein reflux without incompetence at the saphenofemoral junction. Br J Surg1994;81:1452–4
8.
JiangP, van RijAM, ChristieRA, HillGB, ThomsonIA. Nonsaphenofemoral venous reflux in the groin in patients with varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2001;21:550–7
9.
BarrosMVL, LabropoulosN, RibeiroALP, OkawaRY, MachadoFS. Clinical significance of ostial great saphenous vein reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2006;31:320–4
10.
LabropoulosN, LeonL, EngelhornC, AmaralS, RodriguezH, KangS, Sapheno-femoral junction reflux in patients with a normal saphenous trunk. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2004;28:595–9
11.
PorterJM, MonetaGL. Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. International Consensus Committee on Chronic Venous Disease. J Vasc Surg1995;21:635–45
12.
EklöfB, RutherfordRB, BerganJJ, Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement. American Venous Forum International Ad Hoc Committee for Revision of the CEAP Classification. J Vasc Surg2004;40:1248–52
13.
BradburyA, EvansCJ, AllanP, LeeAJ, RuckleyCV, FowkesFG. The relationship between lower limb symptoms and superficial and deep venous reflux on duplex ultrasonography: the Edinburgh Vein Study. J Vasc Surg2000;32:921–31
14.
LabropoulosN, DelisK, NicolaidesAN, LeonM, RamaswamiG. The role of the distribution and anatomic extent of reflux in the development of signs and symptoms in chronic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg1996;23:504–10
15.
MichaelsJA, CampbellWB, BrazierJE, Randomised clinical trial, observational study and assessment of cost-effectiveness of the treatment of varicose veins (REACTIV trial). Health Technol Assess2006;10:1–196
16.
Hospital Episode Statistics online. See http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&categoryID=205 (last checked 22 January 2011)
17.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence2001. Referral Advice. A guide to appropriate referral from general to specialist services. pp 26–27. See http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/Referraladvice.pdf (last checked 22 January 2011)
18.
LabropoulosN, KokkosisAA, SpentzourisG, GasparisAP, TassiopoulosAK. The distribution and significance of varicosities in the saphenous trunks. J Vasc Surg2010;51:96–103
19.
EvansCJ, FowkesFGR, RuckleyCV, Edinburgh vein study: methods and response in a survey of venous disease in the general population. Phlebology1997;12:127–35
20.
VasquezMA, MunschauerCE. Venous Clinical Severity Score and quality-of-life assessment tools: application to vein practice. Phlebology2008;23:259–75
21.
BradburyA, EvansCJ, AllanP, LeeAJ, RuckleyCV, FowkesFG. What are the symptoms of varicose veins? Edinburgh vein study cross sectional population survey. Br Med J1999;318:353–6
22.
ChiesaR, MaroneEM, LimoniC, VolontèM, PetriniO. Chronic venous disorders: correlation between visible signs, symptoms, and presence of functional disease. J Vasc Surg2007;46:322–30
23.
NavarroTP, DelisKT, RibeiroAP. Clinical and hemodynamic significance of the greater saphenous vein diameter in chronic venous insufficiency. Arch Surg2002;137:1233–7
24.
KurtA, UnlüUL, IpekA, Short saphenous vein incompetence and chronic lower extremity venous disease. J Ultrasound Med2007;26:163–7
25.
LabropoulosN, PatelPJ, TiongsonJE, PryorL, LeonLRJr, TassiopoulosAK. Patterns of venous reflux and obstruction in patients with skin damage due to chronic venous disease. Vasc Endovasc Surg2007;41:33–40
CallamMJ. Epidemiology of varicose veins. Br J Surg1994;81:167–73
28.
CooperDG, Hillman-CooperCS, BarkerSG, HollingsworthSJ. Primary varicose veins: the sapheno-femoral junction, distribution of varicosities and patterns of incompetence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2003;25:53–9
29.
SakuraiT, GuptaPC, MatsushitaM, NishikimiN, NimuraY. Correlation of the anatomical distribution of venous reflux with clinical symptoms and venous haemodynamics in primary varicose veins. Br J Surg1998;85:213–6
RutherfordRB, PadbergFTJr, ComerotaAJ, KistnerRL, MeissnerMH, MonetaGL, American Venous Forum's Ad Hoc Committee on Venous Outcomes Assessment. Venous severity scoring: an adjunct to venous outcome assessment. J Vasc Surg2000;31:1307–12
32.
KakkosSK, RiveraMA, MatsagasMI, Validation of the new venous severity scoring system in varicose vein surgery. J Vasc Surg2003;38:224–8
33.
GillettJL, PerrinMR, AllaertFA. Clinical presentation and venous severity scoring of patients with extended deep axial vein reflux. J Vasc Surg2006;44:588–94
34.
RicciMA, EmmerichJ, CallasPW, Evaluating chronic venous disease with a new venous severity scoring system. J Vasc Surg2003;38:909–15
35.
VasquezMA, WangJ, MahathanarukM, BuczkowskiG, SpreheE, DosluogluHH. The utility of the Venous Clinical Severity Score in 682 limbs treated by radiofrequency saphenous vein ablation. J Vasc Surg2007;45:1008–15
36.
VasquezMA, RabeE, McLaffertyRB, American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group. Revision of the venous clinical severity score: venous outcomes consensus statement: special communication of the American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group. J Vasc Surg2010;52:1387–96
