Varicose veins are a common, progressive condition in the UK, with significant negative effects on patients’ quality of life. Despite their prevalence, access to secondary care for the assessment and treatment of varicose veins can be variable throughout the country.
The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidelines developed in 2013 provide evidence-based guidance on the referral, assessment, and management of the patient with venous disease.
In this article, we review the development of the guidelines for the management of varicose veins over the last 15 years, highlighting the latest changes in referral criteria.
Beebe-DimmerJLPfeiferJREngleJS. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol2005; 15: 175–184.
2.
DarvallKABateGRAdamDJ. Generic health-related quality of life is significantly worse in varicose vein patients with lower limb symptoms independent of CEAP clinical grade. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2012; 44: 341–344.
3.
SritharanKLaneTRDaviesAH. The burden of depression in patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2012; 43: 480–484.
4.
RuckleyCV. Socioeconomic impact of chronic venous insufficiency and leg ulcers. Angiology1997; 48: 67–69.
5.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Referral Advice. A guide to appropriate referral from general to specialist services. See www.nice.org.uk/media/94D/BE/Referraladvice.pdf. (accessed June 2015).
6.
Venous Forum of the Royal Society of Medicine., et al., Recommendations for the referral and treatment of patients with lower limb chronic venous insufficiency (including varicose veins). Phlebology 2011; 26: 91–93.
RabeEPannierFKoA. Incidence of varicose veins, chronic venous insufficiency, and progression of the disease in the Bonn vein study ii. J Vasc Surg2010; 51: 791–791.
9.
HarrisMRDaviesRJBrownS. Surgical treatment of varicose veins: effect of rationing. Ann R Coll Surg Engl2006; 88: 37–39.
10.
LimCSGohenMSShepherdAC. Secondary care treatment of patients with varicose veins in National Health Service England: at least how it appeared on a National Health Service website. Phlebology2010; 25: 184–189.
11.
Coleridge-SmithPLabropoulosNPartschH. Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs—UIP consensus document. Part I. Basic principles. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2006; 31: 83–92.
12.
MarshPPriceBAHoldstockJ. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after venous thermoablation techniques: rates of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) and classical DVT after radiofrequency and endovenous laser ablation in a single centre. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2010; 40: 521–527.
13.
FranklinIJBerridgeDBradburyA. Commissioning guide: Varicose Veins2013, pp. 1–14.
GloviczkiPComerotaAJDalsingMC. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg2011; 53: 2S–48S.
16.
WittensCHde RoosKPvan den Broek. Guideline ‘Diagnosis and treatment of varicose veins’. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd2009; 153: B71–B71.
17.
EdwardsAGBaynhamSLeesT. Management of varicose veins: a survey of current practice by members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl2009; 91: 77–80.
18.
SchulMWKingTKabnickLS. Inequalities of health insurance guidelines for the treatment of symptomatic varicose veins. Phlebology2014; 29: 236–246.
