Abstract
Background
Oxidative stress may play an aetiological role in the development and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, evidence on its biochemical markers has been controversial. This article aimed to assess the role of F2-isoprostanes, a marker for measuring in vivo lipid oxidation, as a biomarker for CVD, including coronary artery disease, stroke and peripheral artery disease.
Methods
A literature search was performed using PubMed and EMBASE (from 1966 to February 2012). Studies that investigated the association between F2-isoprostanes and CVD were eligible.
Results
Of the 22 eligible studies retrieved, 20 studies showed a significant association between F2-isoprostanes and CVD. However, to date, there have been only four population-based studies, with one study reporting null association. Although data from prospective studies are ideal to examine a role of such biomarkers in predicting future CVD events, only two studies were prospective. In addition, differences in population characteristics, sample handling/storage and assays, coupled with a lack of confounding adjustment, may all contribute to the enormous variation in previous studies.
Conclusions
High levels of F2-isoprostanes in urine or blood may be a non-specific indicator of CVD. However, further population-based studies are needed. In addition, multivariable analyses are required for future studies to control confounding and improve classification accuracy.
Introduction
First discovered in the early 1990s,1,2 F2-isoprostanes are a family of prostaglandin (PG)-like bioactive compounds that are formed in vivo independently of cyclooxygenases, principally via the free radical-mediated peroxidation of arachidonic acid. The radical attack occurs at carbon 7, 10 or 13 of arachidonic acid, resulting in four possible subfamilies of F2-isoprostanes (series 5, 8, 12 and 15). F2-isoprostanes are referred to as such because they contain F-type prostane rings, and are isomeric to PGF2α.
Since its discovery, levels of F2-isoprostanes have been recommended as a reliable biomarker for measuring in vivo lipid oxidation and oxidative stress.3–5 As F2-isoprostanes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of diseases, 6 their potential role in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has also been investigated.6–8 Although clinical trials with supplemental antioxidants have generally failed to show benefits on CVD,9–13 these studies do not necessarily exclude a role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Little was known about the influence of these antioxidants on oxidative stress in humans and few trials have provided in vivo measurement of oxidative stress. 14 Moreover, studies suggested F2-isoprostanes might exert cellular effects, such as blood vessel contraction and smooth muscle proliferation in the vessels. 15
Accumulating evidence has suggested an association between F2-isoprostanes levels and CVD. This article provides a systematic review of the current evidence on the association between F2-isoprostanes and CVD, including coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke and peripheral artery disease (PAD).
Methods
Study selection
A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and EMBASE (1966 to February 2012). Keywords for searching included F2-isoprostanes, F2-IsoPs, F2IPs, 8-IP, 8-isoprostane, 8-epiPGF2α, 15-F2t-isoprostane, atherosclerosis, CVD, coronary heart disease, CAD, myocardial infarction, stroke and peripheral vessel disease. The search was restricted to studies published in English-language journals and conducted in human. References from recent review articles were also checked for relevant articles. The author determined the eligibility of studies by reading the title, abstract or full-text. As we did not attempt to evaluate the role of F2-isoprostanes in risk classification or prognosis in this paper, only studies that investigated the association between F2-isoprostanes and CVD were eligible. Studies were excluded if they met one of the following criteria: (1) an intervention agent/programme was involved; (2) the reference group was comprised of any other form of CVD; and (3) CVD occurred as a secondary disease. Figure 1 depicts the process for paper selection.
Flowchart of study selection process
Data extraction
Data on first author, publication year, study design, control populations, number of cases and controls, specimen, laboratory methods, biomarker and its measuring unit, main results, and confounding control were extracted and tabulated in a standard format. F2-isoprostanes were presented as mean ± standard error in some studies. We converted the data to mean ± standard deviation using the following formula: standard deviation = standard error × √n. We summarized the evidence in relationships with the combined outcome of CVD, and with CAD, stroke and PAD, respectively.
Results
A total of 22 eligible studies were retrieved, including three on the combined outcome of CVD,16–18 twelve on CAD,19–30 four on stroke31–34 and three on PAD.35–37 The majority of papers were published between 2004 and 2008. All but two studies 18,30 were retrospective in design. Four studies were based in a population, 16,18,22,30 and the others were hospital-based. Only two studies did not find a significant association between F2-isoprostanes and CVD.24,30 The publication years and the significance level for the statistical tests of the association between F2-isoprostanes and CVD (P values <0.01, <0.05 or >0.05) are shown in Figure 2.
The publication years of the included 22 studies and the P values of statistical tests for the association between F2-isoprostanes and cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular disease
All three included studies reported a statistically significant association between F2-isoprostanes and the combined outcome of CVD or mortality.16–18 A cross-sectional study with 2828 participants showed that the creatinine-indexed levels of urinary 8-epi-PGF2α were significantly higher among those with a history of CVD (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, intermittent claudication or congestive heart failure) compared with those without. 16 The results did not change meaningfully after adjustment with multiple covariates (linear regression β = 0.10, P = 0.002). Another recent study compared serum 8-iso-PGF2α (a major F2-isoprostanes isomer) levels between 54 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 54 age- and sex-matched controls without CVD. 17 The crude analysis without adjusting other covariates showed that the mean levels of 8-iso-PGF2α were significantly higher in patients as compared with controls (35.4 ±10.2 versus 29.9 ± 9.9 pg/mL, P<0.001).
A nested case-cohort study showed a predictive role of urine 8-iso-PGF2α in CVD (CHD or stroke) mortality in postmenopausal women. 18 The concentration of 8-iso-PGF2α was determined by liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in overnight urine samples. After adjustment for systolic blood pressure, history of CVD, diabetes, smoking and body mass index (BMI), the highest quartile of urinary 8-iso-PGF2α levels was associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-3.1, P = 0.05) compared with the lowest quartile.
Coronary artery disease
Of the 12 studies on CAD, only two studies did not find a statistically significant association between F2-isoprostanes and CAD. The characteristics of design and main results for the 12 studies are shown in Table 1.
Characteristics of the included studies investigating association between F2-isoprostanes and coronary artery disease
CHD, coronary heart disease; CAD, coronary artery disease; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; BMI, body mass index; CAC, coronary artery calcification; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation; NA, not applicable; GC, gas chromatography; MS, mass spectrometry; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, LC, liquid chromatography
The data are presented as mean (SD) or OR and 95% confidence interval
One early study of small sample size found that urinary levels of 8-epiPGF2α were significantly higher in patients following acute myocardial infarction compared with healthy volunteers. 21 Four studies found that plasma levels of 8-epi-PGF2α were significantly higher in CAD patients compared with healthy volunteers. 20,27,29 Note that none of these studies applied multivariable analysis to control confounding (Table 1).
Two studies applied multivariable analysis but showed inconsistent results.25,30 One case-control study showed a significant association between urinary 8-iso-PGF2α and coronary heart disease (OR = 19.3 for ≥131 mol/mmol versus ≤79 mol/mmol; OR = 9.2 for 60-130 versus ≤79 mol/mmol) after adjusting for multiple covariates. 25 In contrast, a larger case-control study nested in a cohort of a general population did not find a significant association between plasma F2-isoprostanes and incident coronary heart disease (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.93-1.15 for one interquartile increase in F2-isoprostanes). 30
With the use of coronary angiography in clinical practice, the diagnosis of CAD is made based on the presence of angiographic stenosis at coronary artery. Four studies compared F2-isoprostanes levels between consecutive patients with an angiographic diagnosis of CAD and those without evidence of significant stenosis during angiography, and showed significantly higher levels of F2-isoprostanes in CAD patients compared with non-CAD patients.19,23,26,28 In contrast, one study reported that there was no significant difference in plasma 8-isoprostane between CAD and non-CAD patients in a population of 154 consecutive patients undergoing angiography (data not shown in the original report). 24
Subclinical CVD that often precedes the manifestation of clinical CVD is typically associated with traditional coronary risk factors and strongly predicts future clinical CVD events. One study showed that plasma F2-isoprostanes was associated with a higher risk of coronary artery calcification (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.38, per 92.2 pmol/L increment). 22
Stroke
The characteristics of four included case-control studies are shown in Table 2. F2-isoprostanes were all measured in a short time interval from the cerebrovascular events. Three studies reported higher levels of plasma F2-isoprostanes in ischaemic stroke patients as compared with healthy participants.31,33,34 In contrast, one study reported that patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage had higher levels of free form of F2-isoprostanes after surgery in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid as compared with controls. 32 Note that only one of the four included studies performed multivariable analysis to control confounding. 34
Characteristics of the included case-control studies investigating association between F2-isoprostanes and stroke
GC, gas chromatography; MS, mass spectrometry; NICI, negative ion chemical ionisation
The data are presented as mean (SD), OR and 95% confidence interval, or area under receiver operating curve (AUC)
Peripheral artery disease
Peripheral arterial disease is an important manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis and thus shares some pathophysiological mechanisms including oxidative stress with CAD. However, epidemiological evidence linking F2-isoprostanes to PAD has been limited (Table 3). All of the three included studies showed higher levels of urinary 8-iso-PGF2α in patients with chronic lower limb ischaemia compared with healthy controls.35–37 Only one study performed multi-variable adjustment. After adjustment with age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, BMI, creatinine, LDL, triglyceride, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and homocysteine, an increment of every 10 pg/mL in serum 8-iso-PGF2α was associated with an increment of 11% in the risk of lower limb ischaemia (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.20). 36
Characteristics of the included studies investigating association between F2-isoprostanes and peripheral artery disease
PAD, peripheral artery disease; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio
The data are presented as mean (SD) or OR and 95% confidence interval
Discussion
Accumulated evidence to date has indicated a positive association between F2-isoprostanes and CVD, with the exception of only two out of the total 22 studies retrieved. Elevated F2-isoprostanes may be indicative of CVD. However, these studies are heterogeneous in design, sample handling, assay, statistical analysis and data presentation. In particular, some of the following methodological problems need to be carefully addressed in future research.
First, more rigorous study design is need. Only two studies were prospective in design, and none adjusted for full Framingham Risk Score covariates.18,30 In the absence of prospective studies, the temporality has not been established for F2-isoprostanes and CVD, and the possibility of reverse causation is highly likely. Thus, prospective cohort studies are required in the field to provide effect estimates with better adjustment for confounding as well as establishing the temporal sequence between F2-isoprostane elevation and CVD.
Second, the measurement of F2-isoprostanes varied enormously from study to study. Besides different forms of F2-isoprostanes (e.g. unmetabolized or metabolized form, Table 1) being measured across studies, the variation could also be due to specimen handling/storage. Not enough details were provided about the handling of biological samples, e.g. time length between collection and centrifugation, temperature of storage and freeze-thaw. Moreover, some studies investigated plasma F2-isoprostanes, while others were based on urinary F2-isoprostanes. Although plasma and urine are both non-invasive measures of F2-isoprostanes, data are lacking regarding the correlation between the levels in plasma and that in urine. F2-isoprostanes are cleared from the circulation in a rapid manner, approximately 16 min for 8-epi-PGF2α.1 Thus, the plasma F2-isoprostanes would only represent the quantity for discrete short intervals in time. In addition, improper handling and/or prolonged storage of blood samples would lead to the generation of additional F2-isoprostanes after the sample has been collected. 38 Furthermore, most of the previous studies did not provide details about which forms of F2-isoprostanes, free, esterified or total, in plasma were measured. Note that in urine, only free F2-isoprostanes are present.
Third, there are several approaches to final determination of F2-isoprostanes in body fluids (mainly blood and urine), including gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), tandem mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS), LC/MS/MS, radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay.39–43 Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods measure one single isomer, i.e. 15-F2t-isoprostane. GC-MS methods quantify some or all possible F2-isoprostanes stereoisomers, while LC-MS methods separate and identify selected regio isomers and diastereomers. Indeed, the measurement from ELISA correlates very poorly with those from mass spectrometry.44–47 Mass spectrametric methods are superior to radioimmunoassay and ELISA due to their sensitivity and specificity. Among the included studies, measurement of F2-isoprostanes was conducted with different kits, and assays were constructed differently without validity data; thus, these measurements are not in complete agreement.
Finally, most studies did not apply multivariable analysis. The association observed could thus be due to, at least partly, other factors affecting both F2-isoprostanes level and CVD risk. Multivariable analyses were carried out in several studies, but important covariates were not included in final models in some studies. The Framingham Risk Score needs to be adjusted. A list of additional factors to be considered for adjustment might include, but are not limited to, history of cancer, pulmonary disease, liver disease, kidney disease, tuberculosis, neurodegenerative diseases, thyroid disease, inflammatory diseases, diet, extensive exercise, pregnancy, obesity and hyperhomocysteinaemia. A biomarker should have added value beyond the predictive value of currently available markers. In addition, the presentation of data varies across studies. F2-isoprostanes were presented as quartiles, tertiles, mean ± standard deviation or mean ± standard error. The units included ng (pg, pmol)/mmol with or without indexing to creatinine, and lg (ng/mmol). The reported effect estimates included difference in mean or median, OR and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Further studies are needed to evaluate the net gain of predictive power after F2-isoprostanes are incorporated.
In conclusion, evidence is gathering that high levels of F2-isoprostanes in urine or blood may be a non-specific indicator for CVD. However, further population-based studies are needed. In addition, multivariable analyses are required for future studies to control confounding and improve classification accuracy.
